Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Um, you were responding to my post about John Paul Stevens' views about the American flag as an interesting example of how many Americans see the flag. Then you offered your own opinion about the meaning of the U.S. Constitution---you even quoted it---and then insulted "'liberal' leaning judges" for your views of the Constitution.
Prohibiting flag burning is a violation of free speech. Again, not surprising that 'liberal' leaning judges would err on the side of authoritarianism in their interpretation of the Constitution.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The point of my little civics quiz for you was to demonstrate who you really are.
You hold yourself out as a defender of American greatness. You offer strong opinions about American politics, law, and culture. You insult those who disagree with you.
But you don't even know or understand the basics about the U.S. Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment, the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, and the Reconstruction-era amendments.
You know little about American history, even proudly proclaiming that it "bores" you.
You couldn't pass the test required for immigrants to be naturalized as citizens.
And yet he manages to be pissed off 24/7. I’d feel bad for him if he wasn’t such a waste of skin.
Are you saying that he'd be more useful as a lampshade?
You would know about those kind of lampshades, you're descended from a Nazi after all.
You relentlessly yammering dumbfuck, you can't even get one simple thing straight. My great uncle was the SS officer; my grandfather got himself discharged from the Wehrmacht because of bleeding ulcers. I'm descended from a fucking Viennese tailor who didn't want to be in Hitler's army.
I know about lampshades because, unlike you, I read and understand history.
Your uncle was a mass murderer who baked people in ovens and killed peoples' fathers, sons and brothers. Did he kill women and children too? And your grandfather was a pussy.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Um, you were responding to my post about John Paul Stevens' views about the American flag as an interesting example of how many Americans see the flag. Then you offered your own opinion about the meaning of the U.S. Constitution---you even quoted it---and then insulted "'liberal' leaning judges" for your views of the Constitution.
Prohibiting flag burning is a violation of free speech. Again, not surprising that 'liberal' leaning judges would err on the side of authoritarianism in their interpretation of the Constitution.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The point of my little civics quiz for you was to demonstrate who you really are.
You hold yourself out as a defender of American greatness. You offer strong opinions about American politics, law, and culture. You insult those who disagree with you.
But you don't even know or understand the basics about the U.S. Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment, the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, and the Reconstruction-era amendments.
You know little about American history, even proudly proclaiming that it "bores" you.
You couldn't pass the test required for immigrants to be naturalized as citizens.
And yet he manages to be pissed off 24/7. I’d feel bad for him if he wasn’t such a waste of skin.
Are you saying that he'd be more useful as a lampshade?
You would know about those kind of lampshades, you're descended from a Nazi after all.
You relentlessly yammering dumbfuck, you can't even get one simple thing straight. My great uncle was the SS officer; my grandfather got himself discharged from the Wehrmacht because of bleeding ulcers. I'm descended from a fucking Viennese tailor who didn't want to be in Hitler's army.
I know about lampshades because, unlike you, I read and understand history.
Your uncle was a mass murderer who baked people in ovens and killed peoples' fathers, sons and brothers. Did he kill women and children too? And your grandfather was a pussy.
Thanks for clarifiying.
@OBK struggling today like an Oregon goal line stance.
You posted how the judge you admire (and whose cock you'd like to suck dry) argued that the 1st amendment didn't allow the state the power to criminalize flag burning, then in the next post you 'disagreed' with his 'conclusion that the first amendment allows a state to criminalize flag burning. That's a retard level mistake.
I never took your quiz, I attacked the DSA and its views about free speech and gun rights. You can't defend those views because you yourself are a fraud and a huckster of a failed and dangerous ideology from the 20th century that's been rebranded to seem in innocuous when it really isn't. Smart people are not socialists. Successful people are not socialists. It's an ideology of envy and failure, responsible for more than 100 million deaths across multiple nations last century. What does that say about you?
Yes you did, and you failed.
I agree that communism did not have a very good run there. But that history has nothing to do with your lack of basic knowledge about American government.
It says that you're a loser. It says that you're a faggot. It says that you're an un-American POS without a basic understanding of what your own ideology represents. Or maybe you do, that's even worse.
You told us that American history bores you.
What kind of American doesn't like American history?
Losers lose. Losers deflect when they're losing. You deflected away to legalese regarding the constitution. Perhaps you're a lawyer, you like to quibble about the meaning of common words. I don't know and I don't care. Constitutional law is not is not my area of expertise, I already told you that, so fuck off. That doesn't mean I don't know what the amendments are and what is in the Bill of Rights.
You're a glorified socialist stooge and you stepped into the ring with the wrong person. I'm going to pick apart your ideology piece by piece like a vulture picks apart a slab of rotted carrion, then hang it around your neck and make you own it.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Um, you were responding to my post about John Paul Stevens' views about the American flag as an interesting example of how many Americans see the flag. Then you offered your own opinion about the meaning of the U.S. Constitution---you even quoted it---and then insulted "'liberal' leaning judges" for your views of the Constitution.
Prohibiting flag burning is a violation of free speech. Again, not surprising that 'liberal' leaning judges would err on the side of authoritarianism in their interpretation of the Constitution.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The point of my little civics quiz for you was to demonstrate who you really are.
You hold yourself out as a defender of American greatness. You offer strong opinions about American politics, law, and culture. You insult those who disagree with you.
But you don't even know or understand the basics about the U.S. Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment, the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, and the Reconstruction-era amendments.
You know little about American history, even proudly proclaiming that it "bores" you.
You couldn't pass the test required for immigrants to be naturalized as citizens.
And yet he manages to be pissed off 24/7. I’d feel bad for him if he wasn’t such a waste of skin.
Are you saying that he'd be more useful as a lampshade?
You would know about those kind of lampshades, you're descended from a Nazi after all.
You relentlessly yammering dumbfuck, you can't even get one simple thing straight. My great uncle was the SS officer; my grandfather got himself discharged from the Wehrmacht because of bleeding ulcers. I'm descended from a fucking Viennese tailor who didn't want to be in Hitler's army.
I know about lampshades because, unlike you, I read and understand history.
Your uncle was a mass murderer who baked people in ovens and killed peoples' fathers, sons and brothers. Did he kill women and children too? And your grandfather was a pussy.
Thanks for clarifiying.
You still can't get it right, even when you fucking quote me
It's past time for you to step away from you're keybored and re-evaluate you're life
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Um, you were responding to my post about John Paul Stevens' views about the American flag as an interesting example of how many Americans see the flag. Then you offered your own opinion about the meaning of the U.S. Constitution---you even quoted it---and then insulted "'liberal' leaning judges" for your views of the Constitution.
Prohibiting flag burning is a violation of free speech. Again, not surprising that 'liberal' leaning judges would err on the side of authoritarianism in their interpretation of the Constitution.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The point of my little civics quiz for you was to demonstrate who you really are.
You hold yourself out as a defender of American greatness. You offer strong opinions about American politics, law, and culture. You insult those who disagree with you.
But you don't even know or understand the basics about the U.S. Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment, the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, and the Reconstruction-era amendments.
You know little about American history, even proudly proclaiming that it "bores" you.
You couldn't pass the test required for immigrants to be naturalized as citizens.
And yet he manages to be pissed off 24/7. I’d feel bad for him if he wasn’t such a waste of skin.
Are you saying that he'd be more useful as a lampshade?
You would know about those kind of lampshades, you're descended from a Nazi after all.
You relentlessly yammering dumbfuck, you can't even get one simple thing straight. My great uncle was the SS officer; my grandfather got himself discharged from the Wehrmacht because of bleeding ulcers. I'm descended from a fucking Viennese tailor who didn't want to be in Hitler's army.
I know about lampshades because, unlike you, I read and understand history.
Your uncle was a mass murderer who baked people in ovens and killed peoples' fathers, sons and brothers. Did he kill women and children too? And your grandfather was a pussy.
Thanks for clarifiying.
You still can't get it right, even when you fucking quote me
It's past time for you to step away from you're keybored and end you're life
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Um, you were responding to my post about John Paul Stevens' views about the American flag as an interesting example of how many Americans see the flag. Then you offered your own opinion about the meaning of the U.S. Constitution---you even quoted it---and then insulted "'liberal' leaning judges" for your views of the Constitution.
Prohibiting flag burning is a violation of free speech. Again, not surprising that 'liberal' leaning judges would err on the side of authoritarianism in their interpretation of the Constitution.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The point of my little civics quiz for you was to demonstrate who you really are.
You hold yourself out as a defender of American greatness. You offer strong opinions about American politics, law, and culture. You insult those who disagree with you.
But you don't even know or understand the basics about the U.S. Constitution, particularly the Second Amendment, the other amendments in the Bill of Rights, and the Reconstruction-era amendments.
You know little about American history, even proudly proclaiming that it "bores" you.
You couldn't pass the test required for immigrants to be naturalized as citizens.
And yet he manages to be pissed off 24/7. I’d feel bad for him if he wasn’t such a waste of skin.
Are you saying that he'd be more useful as a lampshade?
You would know about those kind of lampshades, you're descended from a Nazi after all.
You relentlessly yammering dumbfuck, you can't even get one simple thing straight. My great uncle was the SS officer; my grandfather got himself discharged from the Wehrmacht because of bleeding ulcers. I'm descended from a fucking Viennese tailor who didn't want to be in Hitler's army.
I know about lampshades because, unlike you, I read and understand history.
Your uncle was a mass murderer who baked people in ovens and killed peoples' fathers, sons and brothers. Did he kill women and children too? And your grandfather was a pussy.
Thanks for clarifiying.
@OBK struggling today like an Oregon goal line stance.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA.
OBK struggling in this thread like Oregon in a title game.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA.
OBK struggling in this thread like Oregon in a title game.
obk is having himself a little spaz fit because he's getting punked like the prison bitch that gets passed around the cell block. I think it's because he likes being the punk. It's the only reasonable explanation for the outlandishly stupid bullshit spewing out of that cockgobbler on his face.
obk is having himself a little spaz fit because he's getting punked like the prison bitch that gets passed around the cell block. I think it's because he likes being the punk. It's the only reasonable explanation for the outlandishly stupid bullshit spewing out of that cockgobbler on his face.
This is an enlightening. It explains why you always sound like you have a dick in your ass whenever you poast. Are you one of those guys who walks around bowlegged and wears a diaper because you got reamed by Bubba one too many times in the slammer? How does it feel to shit when your butthole is the size of a tennis ball?
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law.
Your end game is to ban guns.
You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.
I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.
You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter.
1. Correct. 2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.
Heeey OBK, I was just cleaning some old Nazi flatware that my wife used to feed some fresh tuna to a sick cat (it's feeling better, thanks for asking), and I couldn't help but think just how much more useful you would be as a lampshade.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law.
Your end game is to ban guns.
You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.
I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.
You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter.
1. Correct. 2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law.
Your end game is to ban guns.
You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.
I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.
You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter.
1. Correct. 2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA.
OBK struggling in this thread like Oregon in a title game.
Things benchwarmers say $500 Alex
Yes; I am most definitely a spectator on this one. The others have it well in hand.
There's no shame in it man. We all have bad days. Today is most definitely one of yours. Probably time to consider the wisdom of the cewg motto: pack it in and start over tomorrow.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law.
Your end game is to ban guns.
You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.
I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.
You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter.
1. Correct. 2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.
Nice opening salvo, but like I said, I never claimed to be a lawyer, nor present myself as an expert on American history. I'm not interested in the law or interpreting the intricacies of it. That's creepy coug's domain. Maybe you are him. Either way, you're still a little fish with less than 500 poasts, the alt of someone who doesn't have the gonads to poast under his real sn.
American history bores me. I hate the civil war period for example. I'm more interested in Roman and WW2 history. My interest in WW2 Soviet/Nazi history and knowledge of the political movements of that era allow me to draw parallels between and the socialist/communist/fascist movements of the 20th century and the 'democratic socialist' movement that you're a goose-stepping member of. Clearly you're more intellergent than than that dufus HardlyClothed. You replied to a poast that was addressing the intentions of your movement regarding free speech and the right to bear arms, with the red herring of my 'constitutional knowledge' or lack thereof.
Steering back to the topic at hand. Your side's goal, you being the so called 'democratic socialists, is to repeal the 2nd amendment. Repealing the 2nd amendment gives Congress the ability to pass laws banning guns. But there are state constitutions that have their own amendments protecting the right to bear arms. Those states that don't have such protections are now free to ban guns in the event that the 2nd amendment is repealed. For the states that have gun law protections in their constitutions, those protections are now effectively voided if Congress decides to pass laws banning guns, because federal law supersedes state law.
Your end game is to ban guns.
You're a follower of an ideology that is Marxist, fascist and racist at the same time.
I'm going to uncover and expose every facet of your movement that betrays its real intentions.
You're the challenger, I'm the prize fighter.
1. Correct. 2. I invented the alt handle back on the Rivals boards bantering with titans like @RaceBannon , CastlerockRon, HuskyHusky, JJHusky, @dflea. But the @creepycoug handle became so famous, so synonymous with greatness, that I've long since loathed the practice, at least for myself. So, @Squirt is entirely his own man. And he seems to have the topic well in hand.
Proceed.
"dflea"
"Titan"
lol
Hey there. Show the proper amount of respect. We were carrying on meaningless and never-ending debates about college football on an anonymous message board back when you were making it with cheerleaders. Actually, probably back when you were in diapers.
It's downright un-American to not show deference to your elders. Don't hate America.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA.
OBK struggling in this thread like Oregon in a title game.
Things benchwarmers say $500 Alex
Yes; I am most definitely a spectator on this one. The others have it well in hand.
There's no shame in it man. We all have bad days. Today is most definitely one of yours. Probably time to consider the wisdom of the cewg motto: pack it in and start over tomorrow.
Not really. Ripping a socialist a new asshole is all in a day's work.
I watched the video and to no surprise it was same ol accounts of the inequities of decades and centuries ago with a twist of a few black people being shot by police because they can’t listen 9/10.
He also inaccurately states that people can peaceably protest anywhere and when they want. You can’t. Most people would get fired for what they’re doing, which again for the majority is attention whoring.
While He speaks respectfully, if not eloquently, there is No “it” factor with this guy,
Whether He gets by Lyin Ted or not.
Protest on your dime with your own time if you truly wish to do something other than get likes on your Twatter or Instagram.
You're just too used to dealing with me. There are degrees of "it" factor. I'm on the extreme end. Don't judge others by my example. I'm too good.
Sounds like you're running out of steam Squirt. You're a weak socialist who will never see your Marxist dreams realized here. You aren't smart enough to understand that, it's why you're a member of the DSA.
Fear governs your life.
You cast yourself as a victim.
You blame your troubles on others.
Your refuse to take personal responsibility for your own life.
But don't worry, dude, I still want you and your ilk to have good healthcare, a secure retirement, clean air to breathe, access to clean water, and the opportunity to work or start a business. I want you to be at peace and free from suffering.
Comments
Thanks for clarifiying.
I agree that communism did not have a very good run there. But that history has nothing to do with your lack of basic knowledge about American government. You told us that American history bores you.
What kind of American doesn't like American history? I linked to Wikipedia. You're a fraud.
It's past time for you to step away from you're keybored and re-evaluate you're life
"Titan"
lol
You've got me..... under your skin....
.
There's no shame in it man. We all have bad days. Today is most definitely one of yours. Probably time to consider the wisdom of the cewg motto: pack it in and start over tomorrow.
It's downright un-American to not show deference to your elders. Don't hate America.
You cast yourself as a victim.
You blame your troubles on others.
Your refuse to take personal responsibility for your own life.
But don't worry, dude, I still want you and your ilk to have good healthcare, a secure retirement, clean air to breathe, access to clean water, and the opportunity to work or start a business. I want you to be at peace and free from suffering.