Bill Maher supports free speech

Amateur provocateur posts link to professional provocateur defending another professional provocateur, as if he thinks there's some page in the mythical liberal playbook that says libs need to be tolerant of slander and hate speech.

Really, if this is the hill that you choose to die on, I'm all for it







cue dyspeptic OBK rant with a side of Race

Hate speech isn't a thing

Pitchfork51 said:

Hate speech isn't a thing

Whatever happened to sticks and stones may break my bones but names can never hurt me.?

That was way more effective than this hate speech/free speech bullshit.

RaceBannon said:

BearsWiin said:

Amateur provocateur posts link to professional provocateur defending another professional provocateur, as if he thinks there's some page in the mythical liberal playbook that says libs need to be tolerant of slander and hate speech.

Really, if this is the hill that you choose to die on, I'm all for it







cue dyspeptic OBK rant with a side of Race

I'm legitimately surprised that you're a pussy on this

Thoughts and prayers for Berkeley

But I will defend to the death your right to be a pussy about this

Jones is not being silenced but Maher is right

I know it's been a long time since you were young, Race, but kids learn pretty quickly what if they shit in the sandbox, they get a time out.

You're also old enough to remember a time when a shitstain like Jones would have to submit his work to an editorial bored at a local newspaper, TV or radio outlet, or a magazine editorial bored, or a publishing editorial process if he wanted to get his shit message out. Any of those editorial bored filters could exercise their veto power and refuse to promote his work if they thought it was shit. The internets has derstroyed the threshold for publishing that used to keep most shit out of common circulation. I have no problemo with a private company refusing service to a shitbird like Jones, sorry. If he wants to get his message out and make money on other peoples' platforms, he needs to BE BETTER

Media false flag is imminent

Hippopeteamus said:

BearsWiin said:

RaceBannon said:

BearsWiin said:

Amateur provocateur posts link to professional provocateur defending another professional provocateur, as if he thinks there's some page in the mythical liberal playbook that says libs need to be tolerant of slander and hate speech.

Really, if this is the hill that you choose to die on, I'm all for it







cue dyspeptic OBK rant with a side of Race

I'm legitimately surprised that you're a pussy on this

Thoughts and prayers for Berkeley

But I will defend to the death your right to be a pussy about this

Jones is not being silenced but Maher is right

I know it's been a long time since you were young, Race, but kids learn pretty quickly what if they shit in the sandbox, they get a time out.

You're also old enough to remember a time when a shitstain like Jones would have to submit his work to an editorial bored at a local newspaper, TV or radio outlet, or a magazine editorial bored, or a publishing editorial process if he wanted to get his shit message out. Any of those editorial bored filters could exercise their veto power and refuse to promote his work if they thought it was shit. The internets has derstroyed the threshold for publishing that used to keep most shit out of common circulation. I have no problemo with a private company refusing service to a shitbird like Jones, sorry. If he wants to get his message out and make money on other peoples' platforms, he needs to BE BETTER

While certainly companies should be allowed to restrict whomever they want, I'm slightly worried that the push to ban certain speakers from these platforms is based on a more dangerous (at least for human rationality) belief that people like Jones shouldn't be allowed to speak at all and that government restriction should employed if necessary to restrict even non-slanderous speech that may reflect how Jones actually believes the world to be.

That is a valid concern, but that's not what is fappening here

oregonblitzkrieg said:

BearsWiin said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

BearsWiin said:

Amateur provocateur posts link to professional provocateur defending another professional provocateur, as if he thinks there's some page in the mythical liberal playbook that says libs need to be tolerant of slander and hate speech.

Really, if this is the hill that you choose to die on, I'm all for it

Several of the biggest tech companies acted in unison to shut down





cue dyspeptic OBK rant with a side of Race

Damn fucking right free speech is a hill I would die on. Not you though, the apple doesn't far very far from the tree does it? Your grandfather was a fascist. Now you're here supporting 'hate speech' censorship, the very sort of fascist filth that our American fathers, grandfathers and great grandfathers defeated when they stomped a hole in your grandfather's ass.

A private company has decided to put its business interests over airing Jones' slanderous bullshit. Why do you hate the free market? Are you a closet communist?

Several large tech companies who have a stranglehold on the flow of information on the internet and are now acting as internet censors of agendas they don't like, have decided to act in unison to throttle Jones. You're a dumbfuck if you think it was a business decision, not a political one.

Any business can reserve the right to decline service. While I’m for free speech I’m also for the independence of businesses. Alex jones needs to find another platform. Welcome to free enterprise.