Reporters Fire Back After Ocasio-Cortez Defends Barring Press From Town Hall So People ‘Feel Safe'
Comments
-
Good. These mandarins think they play be separate rules.
-
Just like Alex Jones. This is free pub for her. And you guys are playing into it.
-
Well, if true, that's not a good look. A free and open press is on of the many things that has made this country a more desirable place to live than the "vulnerable" immigrant community's birth nations.
-
I'm not a fan of her in any way. But aren't there a lot of meetings and such that both Democrats and Republican have where the press isn't invited?YellowSnow said:Well, if true, that's not a good look. A free and open press is on of the many things that has made this country a more desirable place to live than the "vulnerable" immigrant community's birth nations.
-
They dont call it the enemy of the people for nothing
-
Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
-
Hugely different than Alex Jones situation.2001400ex said:Just like Alex Jones. This is free pub for her. And you guys are playing into it.
Ah fuckit, I don't know if you're trolling or that stupid. -
Be a better trollHardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
-
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
-
Commies gonna commie!
-
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access. -
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access. -
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access. -
And she's getting free pub for it. Right or wrong. The outrage helps her.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access. -
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access. -
Of course barring the press from public events isn't popular at first, no progressive idea is popular at first. But as the public learns more about banning the press it will get more popularity and eventually the majority will want it. This is how the process works.
Ocasio is a trendsetter. -
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here. -
Is there a country I can immigrate to w/o permission and have same rights as one of their citizens? I'd love to move to Australia for a while.HardlyClothed said:
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here. -
I didn't say they shouldn't have access to her.HardlyClothed said:
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here.
You're the one who brought up how she should be able to meet with her constituents in this thread. Multiple times. I agree.
Then you brought up how the presence of the press can be a threat to illegal immigrants. Which may well be true.
But by definition illegal immigrants are not her constituents, unless you're arguing that they vote anyway, which would be a very off brand argument for you. -
I believe her constituents are everyone who lives in her district whether they vote or not, and everyone whether they’re legal immigrants or not. They are impacted by politics regardless and should be able to talk to the politicians that make policy decisions.dnc said:
I didn't say they shouldn't have access to her.HardlyClothed said:
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here.
You're the one who brought up how she should be able to meet with her constituents in this thread. Multiple times. I agree.
Then you brought up how the presence of the press can be a threat to illegal immigrants. Which may well be true.
But by definition illegal immigrants are not her constituents, unless you're arguing that they vote anyway, which would be a very off brand argument for you.
And if the politican wants to provide a setting that makes those people feel more comfortable voicing their concerns then that is also fine. -
They are to the Democratic Partydnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access. -
She didn't say anything about illegal immigrants.... Just immigrants.dnc said:
I didn't say they shouldn't have access to her.HardlyClothed said:
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here.
You're the one who brought up how she should be able to meet with her constituents in this thread. Multiple times. I agree.
Then you brought up how the presence of the press can be a threat to illegal immigrants. Which may well be true.
But by definition illegal immigrants are not her constituents, unless you're arguing that they vote anyway, which would be a very off brand argument for you. -
Believe it or not, and I'll type slowly since I know this might come as a shock, I'm not talking to her.2001400ex said:
She didn't say anything about illegal immigrants.... Just immigrants.dnc said:
I didn't say they shouldn't have access to her.HardlyClothed said:
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here.
You're the one who brought up how she should be able to meet with her constituents in this thread. Multiple times. I agree.
Then you brought up how the presence of the press can be a threat to illegal immigrants. Which may well be true.
But by definition illegal immigrants are not her constituents, unless you're arguing that they vote anyway, which would be a very off brand argument for you. -
I prefer access to her vaginadnc said:
I didn't say they shouldn't have access to her.HardlyClothed said:
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here.
You're the one who brought up how she should be able to meet with her constituents in this thread. Multiple times. I agree.
Then you brought up how the presence of the press can be a threat to illegal immigrants. Which may well be true.
But by definition illegal immigrants are not her constituents, unless you're arguing that they vote anyway, which would be a very off brand argument for you.
-
I didn't vote for Trump. I'm anti wall and anti separating families. I'm pretty fucking middle on immigration. Buttfuck man you don't get to just blatantly change the meaning of constituent.HardlyClothed said:
I believe her constituents are everyone who lives in her district whether they vote or not, and everyone whether they’re legal immigrants or not. They are impacted by politics regardless and should be able to talk to the politicians that make policy decisions.dnc said:
I didn't say they shouldn't have access to her.HardlyClothed said:
Ah so people who live and work in her district, many of them for decades, and who are directly impacted by her proposed policies are not her constituents and should not be allowed access to her.dnc said:
Illegal immigrants aren't constituentsHardlyClothed said:
There was an illegal immigrant from our state that was targeted by ICE and deported just because he spoke to the press if I recallGrundleStiltzkin said:
It was billed as a townhall event, not a private event. The reasons she gave for excluding the press were complete horseshit.HardlyClothed said:
Ok then fundraisers and conference calls with wealthy donors should be public or provide transcripts to reporters.GrundleStiltzkin said:
It was a public event.HardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
Or it’s fine if she wants to hold a private event with constituents who don’t even have to pony up for her access.
Maybe we should only allow uber wealthy immigrants to provide input into our politics. Rupert Murdoch perhaps. He’s been such a positive influence on our political system in his time here.
You're the one who brought up how she should be able to meet with her constituents in this thread. Multiple times. I agree.
Then you brought up how the presence of the press can be a threat to illegal immigrants. Which may well be true.
But by definition illegal immigrants are not her constituents, unless you're arguing that they vote anyway, which would be a very off brand argument for you.
And if the politican wants to provide a setting that makes those people feel more comfortable voicing their concerns then that is also fine. -
Look proggies, no need to defend her on this one. Chalk it up to her being an inexperienced kid and MoveOn.org
-
Baseman said:
Be a better trollHardlyClothed said:Ah, so establishment polticians doing closed conference calls and private fundraising dinners with their donors is fine but keeping press out of a town hall with constituents is suddenly a threat to the 1st amendment.
-
Yeah I’m not a fan of this even if there seems to be a reasonable argument. @dnc can criticize it but I don’t want to hear shit from Trump voters.
-
Then stfu then.allpurpleallgold said:Yeah I’m not a fan of this even if there seems to be a reasonable argument. @dnc can criticize it but I don’t want to hear shit from Trump voters.
-
@dnc adheres to the same sunny brand of compassionate reform conservatism as me. There are many conservative leaning non Trump voters amongst our ranks.allpurpleallgold said:Yeah I’m not a fan of this even if there seems to be a reasonable argument. @dnc can criticize it but I don’t want to hear shit from Trump voters.
