Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Auburn-Washington predictions

1…7891113

Comments

  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,650 Founders Club
    kirkland88 said:

    dnc said:

    kirkland88 said:

    DoogCourics said:

    AuburnFan said:

    And 26 against Bama (who's D is about 3x better than UW) and 40 against UGA in the reg season (who's 2x better than UW) ...

    So, 66 against the two teams that played for the NC

    Wow .... changing my prediction with said stats .....

    Auburn 37
    UW 17


    Look.... I'm not saying your offense won't score any points. I'm not saying that your offense didn't do well last year. I'm not even saying your offense won't do well this year.



    What I am saying, is that unless you're speaking in hyperbole (I'll help since you're from Alabama - exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally), then you're a fucking retard.























































    Alabama's D was not 3x better than UW, and Georgia's D was not 2x better than UW.





    And no, Alabama math doesn't count.







    Lol, these numbers dont mean shit. Georgia and Bama played an SEC schedule. Love the Pac 12, but its a much easier that the schedule they played.
    SEC > Pac12

    SEC defenses > Pac12 defenses.






    But

    Pac 12 offenses > SEC offenses

    hth

    If SEC defenses are better than Pac 12 defenses, you could argue Pac 12 offenses are only more productive because they play weaker defenses on a regular basis. By this logic, a Pac 12 offense could and probably will look pedestrian to that of the SEC.
    Fuck, even MoosterFS has disowned you to make sure he's not associated with your FS takes. Nothing more needs said.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    kirkland88 said:

    dnc said:

    kirkland88 said:

    DoogCourics said:

    AuburnFan said:

    And 26 against Bama (who's D is about 3x better than UW) and 40 against UGA in the reg season (who's 2x better than UW) ...

    So, 66 against the two teams that played for the NC

    Wow .... changing my prediction with said stats .....

    Auburn 37
    UW 17


    Look.... I'm not saying your offense won't score any points. I'm not saying that your offense didn't do well last year. I'm not even saying your offense won't do well this year.



    What I am saying, is that unless you're speaking in hyperbole (I'll help since you're from Alabama - exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally), then you're a fucking retard.























































    Alabama's D was not 3x better than UW, and Georgia's D was not 2x better than UW.





    And no, Alabama math doesn't count.







    Lol, these numbers dont mean shit. Georgia and Bama played an SEC schedule. Love the Pac 12, but its a much easier that the schedule they played.
    SEC > Pac12

    SEC defenses > Pac12 defenses.






    But

    Pac 12 offenses > SEC offenses

    hth

    If SEC defenses are better than Pac 12 defenses, you could argue Pac 12 offenses are only more productive because they play weaker defenses on a regular basis. By this logic, a Pac 12 offense could and probably will look pedestrian to that of the SEC.
    I’m not saying pac 12 offenses are more productive. I’m saying they are better. The PAC might only be better than the SEC at one position but that position is QB and it’s much better and it’s the reason SEC offenses are not as elite as their defenses.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AU2xguy
    AU2xguy Member Posts: 44
    dnc said:

    kirkland88 said:

    dnc said:

    kirkland88 said:

    DoogCourics said:

    AuburnFan said:

    And 26 against Bama (who's D is about 3x better than UW) and 40 against UGA in the reg season (who's 2x better than UW) ...

    So, 66 against the two teams that played for the NC

    Wow .... changing my prediction with said stats .....

    Auburn 37
    UW 17


    Look.... I'm not saying your offense won't score any points. I'm not saying that your offense didn't do well last year. I'm not even saying your offense won't do well this year.



    What I am saying, is that unless you're speaking in hyperbole (I'll help since you're from Alabama - exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally), then you're a fucking retard.























































    Alabama's D was not 3x better than UW, and Georgia's D was not 2x better than UW.





    And no, Alabama math doesn't count.







    Lol, these numbers dont mean shit. Georgia and Bama played an SEC schedule. Love the Pac 12, but its a much easier that the schedule they played.
    SEC > Pac12

    SEC defenses > Pac12 defenses.






    But

    Pac 12 offenses > SEC offenses

    hth

    If SEC defenses are better than Pac 12 defenses, you could argue Pac 12 offenses are only more productive because they play weaker defenses on a regular basis. By this logic, a Pac 12 offense could and probably will look pedestrian to that of the SEC.
    I’m not saying pac 12 offenses are more productive. I’m saying they are better. The PAC might only be better than the SEC at one position but that position is QB and it’s much better and it’s the reason SEC offenses are not as elite as their defenses.
    Are the Pac 12 QBs better though? Here's the starting QBs from last year in the NFL at the end of the year. The SEC had 5 former players represented compared to the PAC 12s 4. And before you say "well Goff was hurt", an Oregon State grad replaced him, so still a PAC representative in that space. If you throw in Andrew Luck and Carson Palmer (both injured), then the Pac 12 takes a slight 6-5 edge in starters. Nothing to really write home about though.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_starting_quarterbacks_in_the_National_Football_League
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baphomet
    Baphomet Member Posts: 1,511

    Washington 28 - Auburn 13

    UW scores 1 TD for each of our 4 SI pre season all americans.

    https://www.si.com/college-football/photo/2018/08/15/preseason-all-america-team-bryce-love-nick-bosa#16

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,614 Swaye's Wigwam
    23-13 War Eagle

    Slow start and overall output from offense looks just like it did versus SC/Bama 2016, and Penn State last year. Tre/Caleb/Watty (if healthy and plays) are good enough on OL, but at C/RG we aren't there yet.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bread
    Bread Member Posts: 4,109
    Auburn 0 - UW 25.

    I have done a full inspection of Auburn this offseason. I do not see their offense scoring on us. Fuller has a strong start to his Hiesman campaign. Byron/Myles pick 6 just when Auburn starts putting a drive together play of the game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    dnc said:

    kirkland88 said:

    DoogCourics said:

    AuburnFan said:

    And 26 against Bama (who's D is about 3x better than UW) and 40 against UGA in the reg season (who's 2x better than UW) ...

    So, 66 against the two teams that played for the NC

    Wow .... changing my prediction with said stats .....

    Auburn 37
    UW 17


    Look.... I'm not saying your offense won't score any points. I'm not saying that your offense didn't do well last year. I'm not even saying your offense won't do well this year.



    What I am saying, is that unless you're speaking in hyperbole (I'll help since you're from Alabama - exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally), then you're a fucking retard.










































    image
    dnc said:

    kirkland88 said:

    DoogCourics said:

    AuburnFan said:

    And 26 against Bama (who's D is about 3x better than UW) and 40 against UGA in the reg season (who's 2x better than UW) ...

    So, 66 against the two teams that played for the NC

    Wow .... changing my prediction with said stats .....

    Auburn 37
    UW 17


    Look.... I'm not saying your offense won't score any points. I'm not saying that your offense didn't do well last year. I'm not even saying your offense won't do well this year.



    What I am saying, is that unless you're speaking in hyperbole (I'll help since you're from Alabama - exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally), then you're a fucking retard.























































    Alabama's D was not 3x better than UW, and Georgia's D was not 2x better than UW.





    And no, Alabama math doesn't count.







    Lol, these numbers dont mean shit. Georgia and Bama played an SEC schedule. Love the Pac 12, but its a much easier that the schedule they played.
    SEC > Pac12

    SEC defenses > Pac12 defenses.






    But

    Pac 12 offenses > SEC offenses

    hth
    Disagree

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtd
    dtd Member Posts: 5,782 Standard Supporter
    24-23 UW

    fuck
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    dtd said:

    24-23 UW

    fuck

    Good prediction. Bout that one way er the other.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • minion_doog
    minion_doog Member Posts: 2,024
    17-16 UW. Bush will run the ball the D will be stingy and this team will be clutch
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter