Global Warming...
Comments
-
I like to get caught up in semantics and ignore the actual problem, that's what I like to do.
-
Semantics? You mean like your post in another thread where you isolated Katrina, Sandy, and the Philipines typhoon yet ignored the data that this summer was the lowest on record for hurricanes?
-
One sentence, two "I's". Keeping up your batting average.CollegeDoog said:I like to get caught up in semantics and ignore the actual problem, that's what I like to do.
NOGAF. -
You've been on this website a good two months and you still haven't picked up that oft used phrase.death2ducks said:
One sentence, two "I's". Keeping up your batting average.CollegeDoog said:I like to get caught up in semantics and ignore the actual problem, that's what I like to do.
NOGAF.
Death2Ducks/PreDoubtFS -
loadsock said:
Semantics? You mean like your post in another thread where you isolated Katrina, Sandy, and the Philipines typhoon yet ignored the data that this summer was the lowest on record for hurricanes?
-
I support global warming. Washington steals California's climate!
-
Global warming has little to do with mankind you stupid motherfuckers. Ice has come and gone for countless centuries. I LOVE pulling up next to a prius, or ANY treehugging liberal driven automobile, and stoving up my icemelting lifted deisel, and blowing a massive plume of black smoke right in their fucking front seat. Give me a nice big smokey kiss . I hope I melt some snow, then we can drill for oil underneath
-
Climate change won't necassarily cause more storms. Learn. Science. Dummy.loadsock said:Semantics? You mean like your post in another thread where you isolated Katrina, Sandy, and the Philipines typhoon yet ignored the data that this summer was the lowest on record for hurricanes?
-
I like to conflate climate and weather, I do that. (Hi dtdfs!)
-
No, but a few years ago, global warming would....then it became an inconvenient term that people like Al Gore couldn't make a bunch of money off.allpurpleallgold said:
Climate change won't necassarily cause more storms. Learn. Science. Dummy.loadsock said:Semantics? You mean like your post in another thread where you isolated Katrina, Sandy, and the Philipines typhoon yet ignored the data that this summer was the lowest on record for hurricanes?
Ever see Al Gore's home in Nashville? When you do, tell me how much he really believes in the "science" he claims is ruining the earth.
We don't need to debate te science that human presence is creating more greenhouse gases.
I get that science dummy.
What liberals cant fathom is that they think the US political efforts to crack down in our own country is going to have any legitimate effect on most of the rest of the world that will never adhere to the same guidelines that our hypocritical politicians want to slam down our throats while their main mode of transportation requires the use of jet fuel in between their campaign money raising stops.
-
The top polluter in the world is the United States government. Clean up that shit before you start taxing productive people.
Fuck you, fuck me, fuck everyone. -
The Chinese govt disagreesMikeDamone said:The top polluter in the world is the United States government. Clean up that shit before you start taxing productive people.
Fuck you, fuck me, fuck everyone. -
Check the factsPostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Chinese govt disagreesMikeDamone said:The top polluter in the world is the United States government. Clean up that shit before you start taxing productive people.
Fuck you, fuck me, fuck everyone. -
Lots of storms = global warming is a bitch!allpurpleallgold said:
Climate change won't necassarily cause more storms. Learn. Science. Dummy.loadsock said:Semantics? You mean like your post in another thread where you isolated Katrina, Sandy, and the Philipines typhoon yet ignored the data that this summer was the lowest on record for hurricanes?
No storms = climate change won't necessarily cause more storms.
You're right of course, but loadsock isn't the one who brought the number of storms into the discussion.
-
I thought we agreed that no one wants to actually do anything anyway so let's just fuck it and go get high
-
Collegedoog pointed out that weather was becoming more extreme (something that can be caused by climate change) not referencing the number of storms. Some of you need to learn the difference.dnc said:
Lots of storms = global warming is a bitch!allpurpleallgold said:
Climate change won't necassarily cause more storms. Learn. Science. Dummy.loadsock said:Semantics? You mean like your post in another thread where you isolated Katrina, Sandy, and the Philipines typhoon yet ignored the data that this summer was the lowest on record for hurricanes?
No storms = climate change won't necessarily cause more storms.
You're right of course, but loadsock isn't the one who brought the number of storms into the discussion. -
It's too late for that.RaceBannon said:I thought we agreed that no one wants to actually do anything anyway so let's just fuck it and go get high
huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/27/cannabis-carbon-footprint-environment_n_1832035.html
-
The answer was in the article - legalize and grow outside
Do it for the planet -
You're a few years behind the times. China passed us several years ago. Does Ho Li Fuk poast here? You should complain to him.MikeDamone said:The top polluter in the world is the United States government. Clean up that shit before you start taxing productive people.
Fuck you, fuck me, fuck everyone.
hth.
Beijing...
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
