Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Zuckerberg personally decides Alex Jones/Info wars fate
pawz
Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
NY Times is your source?
-
The left vs right political divide is there to trick us in to giving away our rights. We cant give them away any quicker, just to score a win for our team. Bunch of suckers.
-
I didn’t read the article but Zucjerberg can do whatever the fuck he wants w Facebook. It has nothing to do with giving away rights.
If Jones had a rights infringement case he’d have filed it already. -
Supposedly there's some issue where if they want to be a platform or something they aren't supposed to censor stuff but if they want to censor they can't advertise themselves as an unbiased platform.BennyBeaver said:I didn’t read the article but Zucjerberg can do whatever the fuck he wants w Facebook. It has nothing to do with giving away rights.
If Jones had a rights infringement case he’d have filed it already.
Idk I dont really care -
Given the rights stance on net neutrality and corporate pac money I find objecting to this to be laughable.
-
Troomps are victims.allpurpleallgold said:Given the rights stance on net neutrality and corporate pac money I find objecting to this to be laughable.
They are spied upon. Abused by the deep state. Denied free speech. Taken advantage of by third world labor. Earned every penny of their Medicaid, Medicare and social security so don’t you dare touch the welfare they EARNED!1! Mexicans steal their jobs. A $25B useless wall is a solid investment to prevent unskilled, uneducated labor from denying them employment. China manipulates its currency. The EU is a national security threat so the US imposes tariffs. Farmers get $12B in welfare to fight the ensuing and hopeless trade war. While receiving massive subsidies, and paying little to no tax they insist they support the welfare state.
Troomps. -
Fair poontallpurpleallgold said:Given the rights stance on net neutrality and corporate pac money I find objecting to this to be laughable.
-
I, for one, am going to continue to bitch about all three.allpurpleallgold said:Given the rights stance on net neutrality and corporate pac money I find objecting to this to be laughable.
-
I have mixed feelings about it. On one hand, those companies should be able to do what they want. But on the other hand, Facebook is being duplicitous when they say it's due to eliminating hate speech. That's bullshit. It's 100% political. Hardcore Husky allows for all opinions, with very few limitations on free speech. ("N-word", child porn, pro-Nazi, etc.)allpurpleallgold said:Given the rights stance on net neutrality and corporate pac money I find objecting to this to be laughable.
-
Agreed. It's mostly that they are portraying themselves in a different light than the reality.DerekJohnson said:
I have mixed feelings about it. On one hand, those companies should be able to do what they want. But on the other hand, Facebook is being duplicitous when they say it's due to eliminating hate speech. That's bullshit. It's 100% political. Hardcore Husky allows for all opinions, with very few limitations on free speech. ("N-word", child porn, pro-Nazi, etc.)allpurpleallgold said:Given the rights stance on net neutrality and corporate pac money I find objecting to this to be laughable.
