One party just voted against election security
Comments
-
See?
-
Fuck. Read it as erection security.
Tldr -
Some people need to secure their erection. Others are good to let it go.PurpleThrobber said:Fuck. Read it as erection security.
Tldr -
Here @HoustonHusky . This is for you. I know it's Fox business and not mainline Fox. Oddly.... Mainline Fox didn't have this article when I searched for it. Wonder why? Is this a liberal conspiracy? Did a vote really not happen?
https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/the-latest-senate-rejects-new-money-for-election-security -
The last time the Throbber left his erection unsecure, it turned into an @Swaye -like hazy weekend.2001400ex said:
Some people need to secure their erection. Others are good to let it go.PurpleThrobber said:Fuck. Read it as erection security.
Tldr
Living with only one kidney hasn't been that bad.
-
Does it still burn when you pee or did it get it fixed quickly after the weekend?PurpleThrobber said:
The last time the Throbber left his erection unsecure, it turned into an @Swaye -like hazy weekend.2001400ex said:
Some people need to secure their erection. Others are good to let it go.PurpleThrobber said:Fuck. Read it as erection security.
Tldr
Living with only one kidney hasn't been that bad. -
You mean it SHOULDN'T burn when you pee?!?!2001400ex said:
Does it still burn when you pee or did it get it fixed quickly after the weekend?PurpleThrobber said:
The last time the Throbber left his erection unsecure, it turned into an @Swaye -like hazy weekend.2001400ex said:
Some people need to secure their erection. Others are good to let it go.PurpleThrobber said:Fuck. Read it as erection security.
Tldr
Living with only one kidney hasn't been that bad.
@swaye, is that true?
-
That's odd. I learned on here that the Democrats were the ones colluding and that the Russian trolls were actually helping the left. Why wouldn't the GOP want to prevent the election meddling? /s
-
$250 million is too much money when we are spending an additional $80 billion on the military for true protection of our country.insinceredawg said:That's odd. I learned on here that the Democrats were the ones colluding and that the Russian trolls were actually helping the left. Why wouldn't the GOP want to prevent the election meddling? /s
-
We just spent an additional $380MM back in March on it. Lemming.2001400ex said:
$250 million is too much money when we are spending an additional $80 billion on the military for true protection of our country.insinceredawg said:That's odd. I learned on here that the Democrats were the ones colluding and that the Russian trolls were actually helping the left. Why wouldn't the GOP want to prevent the election meddling? /s
HondoFS. -
I'm the lemming but you repeat the exact talking point. Ok!!HoustonHusky said:
We just spent an additional $380MM back in March on it. Lemming.2001400ex said:
$250 million is too much money when we are spending an additional $80 billion on the military for true protection of our country.insinceredawg said:That's odd. I learned on here that the Democrats were the ones colluding and that the Russian trolls were actually helping the left. Why wouldn't the GOP want to prevent the election meddling? /s
HondoFS. -
Democrats and any type of computer/electronic security is a no win deal. They can't even manage the DNC system so who'd vote for anything they proposed. Though they sure do know how to delete shit under subpoena.
-
Computer security is not a partisan issue. And the Dems aren’t in charge right now.Sledog said:Democrats and any type of computer/electronic security is a no win deal. They can't even manage the DNC system so who'd vote for anything they proposed. Though they sure do know how to delete shit under subpoena.
-
To be fair. If Republicans proposed it, Democrats would probably filibuster it.ThomasFremont said:
Computer security is not a partisan issue. And the Dems aren’t in charge right now.Sledog said:Democrats and any type of computer/electronic security is a no win deal. They can't even manage the DNC system so who'd vote for anything they proposed. Though they sure do know how to delete shit under subpoena.
-
Says the guy who's been clamoring about this in at least 3 threads now?2001400ex said:
I'm the lemming but you repeat the exact talking point. Ok!!HoustonHusky said:
We just spent an additional $380MM back in March on it. Lemming.2001400ex said:
$250 million is too much money when we are spending an additional $80 billion on the military for true protection of our country.insinceredawg said:That's odd. I learned on here that the Democrats were the ones colluding and that the Russian trolls were actually helping the left. Why wouldn't the GOP want to prevent the election meddling? /s
HondoFS.
HondoFS... -
They voted against ID to vote?
-
ThomasFremont said:
Computer security is not a partisan issue. And the Dems aren’t in charge right now.Sledog said:Democrats and any type of computer/electronic security is a no win deal. They can't even manage the DNC system so who'd vote for anything they proposed. Though they sure do know how to delete shit under subpoena.
