Collusion isn't a crime
Comments
-
And?
-
-
Collusion isn't a crime. Are you illiterate?RaceBannon said:And?
-
So it's not a crime
What the fuck is your point -
I'm just giving you information. Like Jake Browning is hell bent on proving naysayers wrong.RaceBannon said:So it's not a crime
What the fuck is your point -
Post up the U.S. code for collusion.2001400ex said:
I'm just giving you information. Like Jake Browning is hell bent on proving naysayers wrong.RaceBannon said:So it's not a crime
What the fuck is your point -
The American people say "fuck off"!
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html -
Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.Sledog said:The American people say "fuck off"!
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html -
Bluntness -
Hondo still playing checkers
-
What no link to the US code concerning collusion?ThomasFremont said:
Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.Sledog said:The American people say "fuck off"!
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html
This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime. -
Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...Sledog said:
What no link to the US code concerning collusion?ThomasFremont said:
Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.Sledog said:The American people say "fuck off"!
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html
This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime. -
I got my Kings on. Bitch.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Hondo still playing checkers
-
Really? Which one was for collusion?ThomasFremont said:
Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...Sledog said:
What no link to the US code concerning collusion?ThomasFremont said:
Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.Sledog said:The American people say "fuck off"!
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html
This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime. -
LIPOSledog said:
Really? Which one was for collusion?ThomasFremont said:
Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...Sledog said:
What no link to the US code concerning collusion?ThomasFremont said:
Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.Sledog said:The American people say "fuck off"!
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html
This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime. -
But nothing that takes down a presidency though, right?ThomasFremont said:
Without a crime? We already have multiple guilty pleas in the books. Tick...tick...tick...Sledog said:
What no link to the US code concerning collusion?ThomasFremont said:
Let’s take cues from people watching cable news. That’s the smart thing to do.Sledog said:The American people say "fuck off"!
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/31/fox-news-takes-biggest-bite-out-basic-cable-in-july-including-shark-week.html
This is the problem when one starts an investigation without a crime. No crime was identified nor committed yet voila an investigation of unlimited scope to find a crime. That's backwards boys and girls. A is committed and then we look for a suspect based on evidence. We don't find a suspect and then look for a crime. -
We have a dog and pony show to give Tommy a talking point
