Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Washington vs. Nebraska 1992

17891012

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    salemcoog said:

    salemcoog said:

    Gladstone said:

    dnc said:

    This fucking game has to be the most reminisced about game in the history of CFB fanbases.

    Maybe Oregon beating UW in '94

    Really? I don't think it's even #1 for UW fans. I would say 91 Nebraska is more reminisced about.

    Quite honestly I'd say this one is in the second tier along with All @GrandpaSankey Saw Was Purple, the 92 RB and the Whammy in CreepyCuog. Maybe a tad above Boomer Sooner.
    Fuck do we ever need a signature game in the Petermen era.
    You can minimize it all you want but 44-6 over Stanford, after years and years of being bullied by them, was in every definition a signature win. It leveled the program up, validated Petersen at UW, and funneled us to the P12 championship and a return to relevance. Fuck, we beat them so bad their still-warm corpse got assraped by WSU the following week. Stanford still won 10+ games. They were a good team.

    edit: maybe you meant to say another signature win?
    Nope. Coug further exposed them by winning by 4 TDs down on the farm a weak later. Try again.
    "Fuck, we beat them so bad their still-warm corpse got assraped by WSU the following week. Stanford still won 10+ games. They were a good team."

    I find it amusing a coog of all people posted that. Is there anything more coog than slandering their own team if it makes UW look worse? When cliches go on hyperdrive mode..
    Then by all means, be here to beat your chest over a conference win over Stanford at home.

    Sad.
    Listen GOOG! He has coroborating evidence that proves he's right and you're wrong.

    Fuck if there isn't a bigger whining sandy vag on this bored than Gladstrong when someone shoves one of his stupid af points back up his ass.

    Stanford. Jimminy Christmas.
  • SyphilisButter
    SyphilisButter Member Posts: 221
    edited July 2018
    let's start a gofundme for a prostitute and get creepycougar laid. dude has more sexual frustration angst than a nun on acid
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282

    let's start a gofundme for a prostitute and get creepycougar laid. dude has more sexual frustration angst than a nun on acid

    weak af sauce. now I get the problem; you're like 20 and most of these games were played when your Dads were still using Clearasil.
    when you don't have anything, this is the shit to which you resort. Sad. Sad af.

    fuck ass pretender. yeah, the Miami game was fun and all, but it's not in my honorable mention. Jesus, what a dumb fuck.

    it's always fun to watch someone post something fs and then hang on for dear life defending it. like the other moron pulling your pubes trying to make a 2016 Stanford game a "program signature win".
  • Squirt
    Squirt Member Posts: 485

    That's because you're stupid and impress easily. Even accounting for how much Washington likes to slurp on SC in general, that was a 3-loss team that couldn't beat mediocre-as-fuck Michigan State in the Sun Bowl. In the rear view mirror, while it was a fun game to attend, it didn't have near the historical significance for the program that the Miami win did.

    - 58-game winning streak. Still the mark.

    - The team didn't lose again until the Orange Bowl, where lost by a touchdown to the eventual national champs.

    - 3 years following a disputed national championship with Washington.

    Sorry. To not have that game even in your honorable mention means you have an agenda.

    Kewg

    Well, at least we agree the Huskies football program doesn't define itself by beating the Cougs.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    Disappointed in you losers. Not really. I like to see the lowered husky standards becoming the norm. Nick Saban pulled his starting QB in the championship game. That was a big time, top 5 coach move. And everyone here is on Brownsocks train with Pete, acting like the second part of what I said, benching Brownsocks, would be a bad thing. Hilarious.

    Your* an idiot.




    But it's cool. Your our? idiot!
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    Squirt said:

    That's because you're stupid and impress easily. Even accounting for how much Washington likes to slurp on SC in general, that was a 3-loss team that couldn't beat mediocre-as-fuck Michigan State in the Sun Bowl. In the rear view mirror, while it was a fun game to attend, it didn't have near the historical significance for the program that the Miami win did.

    - 58-game winning streak. Still the mark.

    - The team didn't lose again until the Orange Bowl, where lost by a touchdown to the eventual national champs.

    - 3 years following a disputed national championship with Washington.

    Sorry. To not have that game even in your honorable mention means you have an agenda.

    Kewg

    Well, at least we agree the Huskies football program doesn't define itself by beating the Cougs.
    No. I suspect we? agree about very little, other than perhaps that you're an idiot.


    Kewg
  • Squirt
    Squirt Member Posts: 485
    edited July 2018

    No. I suspect we? agree about very little, other than perhaps that you're an idiot.

    Kewg

    You're a purported WSU fan in an online Huskies community arguing with somebody whose handle is "Squirt" about his personal list of "Top 5 Signature Games" in Huskies football history.

    You're calling this "Squirt" fellow "stupid" and accusing him of having "an agenda" because this "Squirt" guy didn't include the Huskies' win in 1994 over the Miami Hurricanes in his top seven.

    Damon Huard, is that you?
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    chuck said:

    Disappointed in you losers. Not really. I like to see the lowered husky standards becoming the norm. Nick Saban pulled his starting QB in the championship game. That was a big time, top 5 coach move. And everyone here is on Brownsocks train with Pete, acting like the second part of what I said, benching Brownsocks, would be a bad thing. Hilarious.

    Pete is playing it safe. He wants the Washington jerb for life, and understands its better to stick it out with a proven but failed commodity rather than take the hard risk and start another QB. In other words, we're going to lose to Auburn and we're ok with that, as long as we lose well. Brownsocks will keep it as close as possible so that the loss looks good for us.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,282
    Squirt said:

    No. I suspect we? agree about very little, other than perhaps that you're an idiot.

    Kewg

    You're a purported WSU fan in an online Huskies community arguing with somebody whose handle is "Squirt" about his personal list of "Top 5 Signature Games" in Huskies football history.

    You're calling this "Squirt" fellow "stupid" and accusing him of having "an agenda" because this "Squirt" guy didn't include the Huskies' win in 1994 over the Miami Hurricanes in his top seven.

    Damon Huard, is that you?
    Hmm. You make some compelling points. Let me see if I can drive that boat too:

    I'm a purported WSU fan in an online Huskies community using the name "creepy"coug, I've told you I was at the 1990 SC game, I've spelled out "Kewg" like that, and I've otherwise hinted with sarcasm, more than a few times, that your kewg digs are really getting to me, arguing with somebody whose handle is "Squirt" about random shit like being the only fucking Husky I know who doesn't score the 1994 win over Miami as an all-time signature win in Husky history, in a forum and in a thread dedicated to arguing about random shit just. like. that.

    You're calling this "creepycoug" fellow a "dumb-ass" and accusing him of lacking a "sense of humor" because this "creepycoug" guy had the audacity to point out that your list is fucking stupid.

    Sandy Vag, is that you? Did you mistake this forum for a place of rational, grown-up discussion? You know, there is a sub-forum on here called the Tug Tavern. Check it out! Posters tell other posters to go die in fucking fires, make light of AIDs, cancer, starvation, racism, rape, murder, genocide and homosexuality, question the validity of other cultures and religions, and post gifs of tits, ass, people pissing, puking and taking a shit, and all manner of other morally questionable things. Actually, that happens in all the forums. So if you think this is a board for swooping in and acting like the resident adult with perspective, you can just go fuck off and hang yourself, because you are one stupid mother fucker anyway.

    PS: if you had any such perspective, you'd have dropped this 5 posts ago, but you didn't. so, again, fuck off.
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,808 Swaye's Wigwam

    chuck said:

    Disappointed in you losers. Not really. I like to see the lowered husky standards becoming the norm. Nick Saban pulled his starting QB in the championship game. That was a big time, top 5 coach move. And everyone here is on Brownsocks train with Pete, acting like the second part of what I said, benching Brownsocks, would be a bad thing. Hilarious.

    Pete is playing it safe. He wants the Washington jerb for life, and understands its better to stick it out with a proven but failed commodity rather than take the hard risk and start another QB. In other words, we're going to lose to Auburn and we're ok with that, as long as we lose well. Brownsocks will keep it as close as possible so that the loss looks good for us.
    Pressing badly. You know the QB situation as well as anyone here and are just being stupid so you can troll. There isn't a viable option to take a chance on.