Washington vs. Nebraska 1992
Comments
-
wtf?oregonblitzkrieg said:Disappointed in you losers. Not really. I like to see the lowered husky standards becoming the norm. Nick Saban pulled his starting QB in the championship game. That was a big time, top 5 coach move. And everyone here is on Brownsocks train with Pete, acting like the second part of what I said, benching Brownsocks, would be a bad thing. Hilarious.
-
You don't know it, but you don't get it, and there are people reading your posts laughing at you.Squirt said:
Don't be mad that not a single Apple Cup counts as a signature win for the UW, but it's WSU's biggest game every year.creepycoug said:
Ok! Stanford 2016 was your signature win! Congratulations. You've been working really hard.Squirt said:
There is evidence that contradicts your argument. Consider:Doogles said:Say what you want about the Tree and how meaningful it was to us and the PAC but everyone else nationally gave fuck all about it.
1. Long-dormant Washington throttled Stanford and put college football on notice (Washington Post)
2. The game was the national Friday game on ESPN.
3. Highlights were on repeat on SportsCenter that night, with Scott Van Pelt introducing his interview with Coach Pete by saying, "The Washington Huskies changed the conversation with what they just did."
4.
5.
But the Kewg digs do really hurt.
Dumb dumb. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Disappointed in you losers. Not really. I like to see the lowered husky standards becoming the norm. Nick Saban pulled his starting QB in the championship game. That was a big time, top 5 coach move. And everyone here is on Brownsocks train with Pete, acting like the second part of what I said, benching Brownsocks, would be a bad thing. Hilarious.
-
Corroborating? What are you Columbo? I didn't think you were on that level of dumbfuck.Gladstone said:
Yup. There are myriad non west coast sources corroborating this. Also, you know, the fact that the team did actually go on to win the P12. Not worth getting into with the short bus crowd. Someone shield me from the autism explosion from creep. I can feel it coming. Help.Squirt said:
There is evidence that contradicts your argument. Consider:Doogles said:Say what you want about the Tree and how meaningful it was to us and the PAC but everyone else nationally gave fuck all about it.
1. Long-dormant Washington throttled Stanford and put college football on notice (Washington Post)
2. The game was the national Friday game on ESPN.
3. Highlights were on repeat on SportsCenter that night, with Scott Van Pelt introducing his interview with Coach Pete by saying, "The Washington Huskies changed the conversation with what they just did."
4.
5.
We're talking about something that is 85% emotion, 15% perception. You're not "coroborating" anything.
Autism references aren't going to help you.
Congratulations. You just make your program historically insignificant, or at least boring. -
Unironic comment about other people laughing at posts from the least self-aware sperglord on the forum.creepycoug said:
You don't know it, but you don't get it, and there are people reading your posts laughing at you.Squirt said:
Don't be mad that not a single Apple Cup counts as a signature win for the UW, but it's WSU's biggest game every year.creepycoug said:
Ok! Stanford 2016 was your signature win! Congratulations. You've been working really hard.Squirt said:
There is evidence that contradicts your argument. Consider:Doogles said:Say what you want about the Tree and how meaningful it was to us and the PAC but everyone else nationally gave fuck all about it.
1. Long-dormant Washington throttled Stanford and put college football on notice (Washington Post)
2. The game was the national Friday game on ESPN.
3. Highlights were on repeat on SportsCenter that night, with Scott Van Pelt introducing his interview with Coach Pete by saying, "The Washington Huskies changed the conversation with what they just did."
4.
5.
But the Kewg digs do really hurt.
Dumb dumb.
Gold. -
You're reaching. The situations aren't comparable. That was game 14 for Saban's highly talented backup. This is the opener for UW and the first time the two freshmen will suit up. Then we have non mobile, 6' Jake Haener.oregonblitzkrieg said:Disappointed in you losers. Not really. I like to see the lowered husky standards becoming the norm. Nick Saban pulled his starting QB in the championship game. That was a big time, top 5 coach move. And everyone here is on Brownsocks train with Pete, acting like the second part of what I said, benching Brownsocks, would be a bad thing. Hilarious.
-
creepycoug said:
You don't know it, but you don't get it, and there are people reading your posts laughing at you.
But the Kewg digs do really hurt.
Dumb dumb.
-
The game was on Friday night on ESPN. Of course ESPN is going to talk about it.Squirt said:
There is evidence that contradicts your argument. Consider:Doogles said:Say what you want about the Tree and how meaningful it was to us and the PAC but everyone else nationally gave fuck all about it.
1. Long-dormant Washington throttled Stanford and put college football on notice (Washington Post)
2. The game was the national Friday game on ESPN.
3. Highlights were on repeat on SportsCenter that night, with Scott Van Pelt introducing his interview with Coach Pete by saying, "The Washington Huskies changed the conversation with what they just did."
4.
5.
It was not a program defining win. Creep is right. -
Listen, I'm not going to take shit digs at my school and fan base lying down. If you don't like it that's tough shit. That's the point.Gladstone said:
Unironic comment about other people laughing at posts from the least self-aware sperglord on the forum.creepycoug said:
You don't know it, but you don't get it, and there are people reading your posts laughing at you.Squirt said:
Don't be mad that not a single Apple Cup counts as a signature win for the UW, but it's WSU's biggest game every year.creepycoug said:
Ok! Stanford 2016 was your signature win! Congratulations. You've been working really hard.Squirt said:
There is evidence that contradicts your argument. Consider:Doogles said:Say what you want about the Tree and how meaningful it was to us and the PAC but everyone else nationally gave fuck all about it.
1. Long-dormant Washington throttled Stanford and put college football on notice (Washington Post)
2. The game was the national Friday game on ESPN.
3. Highlights were on repeat on SportsCenter that night, with Scott Van Pelt introducing his interview with Coach Pete by saying, "The Washington Huskies changed the conversation with what they just did."
4.
5.
But the Kewg digs do really hurt.
Dumb dumb.
Gold.
If self-awareness were a necessary quality around here, the forum wouldn't exist. But thanks for swooping in with your grounded perspective.
Moron.
-
That's because you're stupid and impress easily. Even accounting for how much Washington likes to slurp on SC in general, that was a 3-loss team that couldn't beat mediocre-as-fuck Michigan State in the Sun Bowl. In the rear view mirror, while it was a fun game to attend, it didn't have near the historical significance for the program that the Miami win did.Squirt said:
Your point was that the 1994 Miami game was a bigger win than 1990 USC and that it is ridiculous to believe otherwise. That's the point I disagree with strongly; I'm not arguing that 1994 Miami wasn't a big win. It just doesn't belong my personal Top 5 signature wins of UW history, nor in the honorable mentions.creepycoug said:
Cute.Squirt said:I see what you're saying. But for me:
1992 Rose Bowl: National Championship
1985 Orange Bowl: National Championship (fuck off, BYU)
1990 USC: Huskies were underdogs against the number-5 team in the country, and then destroyed them. It was a break-out game heralding a three-year run of competing for best in the country.
1991 Nebraska: Key to the championship season.
I can't put any games from the 2000 season above those. Maybe above the 2016 signature games---Stanford and Oregon. But I put 2016 Oregon on top of the 2000 games. While those were incredible wins and make my top seven, the 2000 season was an aberration during a period of crushing mediocrity. The 2016 signature games bore more in common with those from 1990-91: big wins, and they marked an era, not just a single season, of greatness.
Still, I respect your reasoning and wouldn't criticize anyone making a different subjective conclusion about the 2000 games relative to 2016. I can also understand someone viewing 2016 Stanford as a bigger win than 2016 Oregon.
As for creep, GTFO, especially with that 1994 Miami shit. That was a fun game, but the Huskies were 7-4 that year and just starting the mediocre Lambright era. The game had no bigger meaning than the game itself. Maybe it was fun to spoil Miami's winning streak, but big whoop. Dawgs aspire to be champions, not spoilers. Maybe as a coog you don't understand that.
Reed Stronger: the sub-thread is "signature wins" brotus. If you don't think beating Miami in the Orange Bowl and breaking the longest home winning streak is a signature win, then, sure, ok. I will tell you that among the legion of Husky fans in my life, and there are many, you are in a class of one. I don't know a single hairy husky who doesn't put the Whammy up in at least in the top 5, and many put it at #1 or #2. Same with the Orange Bowl; the fact that it didn't translate to a national championship is highly irrelevant.
Jesus, half this bored is claiming the "All I saw ... " gayme against a 4-loss SC team led by a pot-head weirdo that couldn't win the fucking Sun Bowl against Michigan State. So spare me the "champions only" shit talk Mr. 1/2 title.
But your poast had some really neat tuff talk. I'll give you that.
As for your gratuitous insult of my Kewg roots, I say to you, on behalf of my main broh @salemcoog and all of Cuog Nation, you are cordially invited to meat me and Salem at the 7-11 parking lot - the one on Aurora near the U district - to discuss this matter further.
You want to disagree, that's fine, but you're being a dumb-ass coog about it. Most Cuogs I know have great senses of humor and are fun to talk to. And then there's you in this thread.
- 58-game winning streak. Still the mark.
- The team didn't lose again until the Orange Bowl, where lost by a touchdown to the eventual national champs.
- 3 years following a disputed national championship with Washington.
Sorry. To not have that game even in your honorable mention means you have an agenda.
Kewg
