They're not coming for your guns

Pitchfork51 said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Pitchfork51 said:

Swaye said:

I love Liz Hurley.

She's so hot it makes me feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

Or at least was back in the 90s but you know what I mean.

Elizabeth Hurley is hot. The limey accent makes her even more attractive. As she nears her expiration date, Sienna Miller is tanned, rested and ready to fill in.

In layer cake she is punch in the nuts hot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lob_1H4lLL4

Pitchfork51 said:

The club scene you pathetic cunt!

UW_Doog_Bot said:

salemcoog said:

Sledog said:

salemcoog said:

Sledog said:

salemcoog said:

Sledog said:

salemcoog said:

YellowSnow said:

I am against taking away citizen's legally owned firearms w/o due process. BUT part of the Yella Platform is that if you have a minor who gets a hold of one of your gun's and shoots someone at school, you're just as fucking guilty and will get the death penalty. You want to own the guns great, but with that privilege comes great responsibility.

Yep. Chain of custody. You are your weapon. Whatever it does, you did, until there is a bill of sale or a police report for theft preceding the shit that went down.

And then the courts can figure it out after that.

Be it a minor or anyone in my book.

So those big rental truck companies CEO's are all in prison?

That’s stupid. Someone signed off on the rental agreement to take custody of the truck. No one rents guns. And if there is some sort of gun rental service, whoever rented the gun would absolve the owner of any wrong doing when signing the rental agreement and taking custody.

Just an analogy. But having a gun taken from you in a crime (theft, burglary, robbery etc.) somehow means you are still responsible for anything that happens with it. If it's your own kid and it was unsecured is one thing but a juvenile (or any thief etc.) thief is not.

If someone breaks into your house and steals your Gun, they would have stolen other things as well. You would know if it happened. Calling the police to report it stolen would absolve you of whatever happens with that weapon.

Too many people are hiding behind the 2nd amendment as if a gun owner doesn’t or shouldn’t have responsibilities as to what happens to your weapon. Just because you have a right to own it doesn’t mean you don’t have a responsibility to store it safely so that no one other than you can get to it.

And if something happened, the courts can figure out whether you were negligent or not. And this would spark innovation and growth in the gun safe industry.

People stealing your property should absolve you of any liability. It does with any other item and should for firearms. Otherwise you need Fort Knox like security to protect yourself from liability. The founders didn't have gun safes. I'm not hiding behind the 2nd amendment but am asking for equal protection under the law as required by the 14th amendment.

I covered the theft and liability in my poast.

The founders had one shot muskets.

If you can’t secure your weapons, you shouldn’t own them.

The founders had canons and warships and other fun weapons that we don't get to own today. In many instances their private arsenals were bigger and more well equipped than the local armory.

Your faith in the courts leads me to believe you haven't been in one too often.

People should still own gun safes as good practice and as a responsible owner.