Watched the Fiesta Bowl again...
Comments
-
Boys, buy you tickets now!Mosster47 said:Auburn's front seven is going to dominate your O-line and when Brownsocks is under pressure....well.
Auburn's O will be far from great but Stidham is really good.
Very very small chance you win, but if Gaskin can make something out of nothing all night on 1st down it should be chinteresting. -
This is Pete’s first turn going up against a good team the first game of the season at UW. At least with a good team going in anyway. His record at BSU getting ready for big games with a long layoff, be it Bowls or openers was impeccable. If you’re truly baaaaaaackk. You win this game. If you don’t, then you’re probably the same team you were the last 2 years. Good enough to wreck most PAC 12 teams but still not ready for Primetime at the end of the Season. If Browning can’t deliver against a team like Auburn the first game, He’s not going to do it in January either.
-
It's chinteresting because Pete's generally been terrible in openers at UW. We underperformed in the Hawaii game, lost the Boise game, and didn't look very good this year at Rutgers. Only the 2016 Rutgers game was what you would have wanted to see, and that was not so coincidentally the one year we had a legitimately very good team.salemcoog said:This is Pete’s first turn going up against a good team the first game of the season at UW. At least with a good team going in anyway. His record at BSU getting ready for big games with a long layoff, be it Bowls or openers was impeccable. If you’re truly baaaaaaackk. You win this game. If you don’t, then you’re probably the same team you were the last 2 years. Good enough to wreck most PAC 12 teams but still not ready for Primetime at the end of the Season.
I'm hoping most of the opener woes have been because of shit competition, and we'll come out strong for Auburn since as you noted Pete has it in him to start fast. He hasn't shown it much since coming to UW though. -
Your dwags have been night and day when at home or on the road during this run. AC excepted. Almost like a Hoops team. You were horrible for most of 3 quarters against a bottom 20 program in Rutgers last season. Auburn will be pretty much a road game as I understand it’s in the ATL or Dallas? So it’s a big step for your dwags. But still a step that would expect to be taken to be a top 5 or playoff team.dnc said:
It's chinteresting because Pete's generally been terrible in openers at UW. We underperformed in the Hawaii game, lost the Boise game, and didn't look very good this year at Rutgers. Only the 2016 Rutgers game was what you would have wanted to see, and that was not so coincidentally the one year we had a legitimately very good team.salemcoog said:This is Pete’s first turn going up against a good team the first game of the season at UW. At least with a good team going in anyway. His record at BSU getting ready for big games with a long layoff, be it Bowls or openers was impeccable. If you’re truly baaaaaaackk. You win this game. If you don’t, then you’re probably the same team you were the last 2 years. Good enough to wreck most PAC 12 teams but still not ready for Primetime at the end of the Season.
I'm hoping most of the opener woes have been because of shit competition, and we'll come out strong for Auburn since as you noted Pete has it in him to start fast. He hasn't shown it much since coming to UW though.
I’m trying to think of UWs signature road win in the Pete era. I remember Utah but I can’t remember if your win against SC was at home or a roadie? -
I stopped reading at 'Matt Lubick'
-
that game was epic for sark losing it on the side line and topped off by banner crying with a flag drapped over him.salemcoog said:
Your dwags have been night and day when at home or on the road during this run. AC excepted. Almost like a Hoops team. You were horrible for most of 3 quarters against a bottom 20 program in Rutgers last season. Auburn will be pretty much a road game as I understand it’s in the ATL or Dallas? So it’s a big step for your dwags. But still a step that would expect to be taken to be a top 5 or playoff team.dnc said:
It's chinteresting because Pete's generally been terrible in openers at UW. We underperformed in the Hawaii game, lost the Boise game, and didn't look very good this year at Rutgers. Only the 2016 Rutgers game was what you would have wanted to see, and that was not so coincidentally the one year we had a legitimately very good team.salemcoog said:This is Pete’s first turn going up against a good team the first game of the season at UW. At least with a good team going in anyway. His record at BSU getting ready for big games with a long layoff, be it Bowls or openers was impeccable. If you’re truly baaaaaaackk. You win this game. If you don’t, then you’re probably the same team you were the last 2 years. Good enough to wreck most PAC 12 teams but still not ready for Primetime at the end of the Season.
I'm hoping most of the opener woes have been because of shit competition, and we'll come out strong for Auburn since as you noted Pete has it in him to start fast. He hasn't shown it much since coming to UW though.
I’m trying to think of UWs signature road win in the Pete era. I remember Utah but I can’t remember if your win against SC was at home or a roadie? -
-
College football is better when sark is a part of it
Kevin sumlin is a boring shitty substitute. -
-
Dont fforget kicker. Vizciano was bad at field goals but atleast was good on kick offs. Do we even have a kicker on the roster?
