Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
DM to good guys with guns
Comments
-
Odd you think it's wrong to show ID to vote but it's perfectly OK to gut the second amendment to the constitution. Why should people have to pay fees and have their constitutional right restricted? How about you pay to have free speech? How a test before you may speak in public? Or to have coverage under the 4th amendment? Or maybe the 5th?2001400ex said:Both of you are exactly my point. You both have an irrational fear of shit like background checks. Da fuq? We have an issue. But you want to do absolutely nothing to solve it.
Idiots.
How about if we simply say members of certain races or classes are more prone to criminal activity and should be denied most constitutional rights?
You commies are funny.
Fingerprint locks? When You need a gun it positively has to work right now. No waiting for a lock to ID and and allow you to use the item. How about if your hand is bloody? When you need a gun really bad shit is happening and you may often already be in a fight or injured. How's that print reader work covered in blood or mud or dirt? How about the damn battery? When life and death is on the line count on a brain dead liberal to make rules only for the non-criminal.
Your crappy list illustrates that you want to outlaw all guns. Right now it's this certain type of gun. When that's gone it'll be another type of gun that's the problem and that would go on until nothing was left. Then it would be knives and pretty soon you tards would try and outlaw rocks. It's the person not the object. Place the blame where it belongs. None of your suggestions would have prevented any of the mass shootings you speak of, but here you are.
-
You are a special kind of stupid. And this line of thinking will get guns banned.Sledog said:
Odd you think it's wrong to show ID to vote but it's perfectly OK to gut the second amendment to the constitution. Why should people have to pay fees and have their constitutional right restricted? How about you pay to have free speech? How a test before you may speak in public? Or to have coverage under the 4th amendment? Or maybe the 5th?2001400ex said:Both of you are exactly my point. You both have an irrational fear of shit like background checks. Da fuq? We have an issue. But you want to do absolutely nothing to solve it.
Idiots.
How about if we simply say members of certain races or classes are more prone to criminal activity and should be denied most constitutional rights?
You commies are funny.
Fingerprint locks? When You need a gun it positively has to work right now. No waiting for a lock to ID and and allow you to use the item. How about if your hand is bloody? When you need a gun really bad shit is happening and you may often already be in a fight or injured. How's that print reader work covered in blood or mud or dirt? How about the damn battery? When life and death is on the line count on a brain dead liberal to make rules only for the non-criminal.
Your crappy list illustrates that you want to outlaw all guns. Right now it's this certain type of gun. When that's gone it'll be another type of gun that's the problem and that would go on until nothing was left. Then it would be knives and pretty soon you tards would try and outlaw rocks. It's the person not the object. Place the blame where it belongs. None of your suggestions would have prevented any of the mass shootings you speak of, but here you are.
Idiot. -
No idiots like you will get guns banned. I doubt you'll be the commie coming to take them away.2001400ex said:
You are a special kind of stupid. And this line of thinking will get guns banned.Sledog said:
Odd you think it's wrong to show ID to vote but it's perfectly OK to gut the second amendment to the constitution. Why should people have to pay fees and have their constitutional right restricted? How about you pay to have free speech? How a test before you may speak in public? Or to have coverage under the 4th amendment? Or maybe the 5th?2001400ex said:Both of you are exactly my point. You both have an irrational fear of shit like background checks. Da fuq? We have an issue. But you want to do absolutely nothing to solve it.
Idiots.
How about if we simply say members of certain races or classes are more prone to criminal activity and should be denied most constitutional rights?
You commies are funny.
Fingerprint locks? When You need a gun it positively has to work right now. No waiting for a lock to ID and and allow you to use the item. How about if your hand is bloody? When you need a gun really bad shit is happening and you may often already be in a fight or injured. How's that print reader work covered in blood or mud or dirt? How about the damn battery? When life and death is on the line count on a brain dead liberal to make rules only for the non-criminal.
Your crappy list illustrates that you want to outlaw all guns. Right now it's this certain type of gun. When that's gone it'll be another type of gun that's the problem and that would go on until nothing was left. Then it would be knives and pretty soon you tards would try and outlaw rocks. It's the person not the object. Place the blame where it belongs. None of your suggestions would have prevented any of the mass shootings you speak of, but here you are.
Idiot.
You wouldn't know shit from Shinola. -
Democrats.
Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution. -
The constitution was intended to be amended.Pitchfork51 said:Democrats.
Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution. -
WilburHooksHands said:
The constitution was intended to be amended.Pitchfork51 said:Democrats.
Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution.
Yeah.
Which is why the only legit way to change anything gun wise is to amend the constitution.
Yet they are always proposing some pussy ass halfway measure. -
The first ten amendments are not amendable. Those were specifically singaled out as rights that preexisted the constitution and were granted by the creator. HTHPitchfork51 said:WilburHooksHands said:
The constitution was intended to be amended.Pitchfork51 said:Democrats.
Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution.
Yeah.
Which is why the only legit way to change anything gun wise is to amend the constitution.
Yet they are always proposing some pussy ass halfway measure.
http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/12/27/repeal-of-the-second-amendment-would-not-abolish-any-right/
I'm so glad this was immediately turned into a gun control thread when I asked you pussbags what YOU would do to stop a mass shooting.
Hondo of course went full faggot. -
Read some supreme court decisions.Pitchfork51 said:Democrats.
Always too fucking afraid to just say they want to amend the Constitution. -
This argument never ends. I will say I hate the Country folk who post about how they teach gun responsibility to their inbred 11 year old and how guns are so great. The 11 year old can take apart and clean the guns too. It teaches the kids about safety, discipline, and responsibility!
They are so oblivious and stupid that most rational people could give a flying fuck about the guns on their property or that the inbred 11 year old from Arkansas knowing how to use them.
The problem is psychos getting their hands on guns. It could get fixed, but it won't. -
TYFYS. Morally I just can't bring myself to own a gun but I keep my body in peak physical condition. Herd animal mentality. Just have to be faster than the slowest person around you. In confined spaces strong enough to force the weaklings into being human shields.Sledog said:
You wouldn't find me hiding. I'd actively be doing all I could to stop it.2001400ex said:Sledog needs concealed carry cause he'll take out the active shooter. All he needs is a gun and bullets.
How about the rest of you?
