This is why Dennis won't let us have nice things
Comments
-
Other than USC do they match Pac10/12 results? I would like to see this broken down.RaceBannon said:
So is it just dumb luck that the recruiting rankings match results rankings? That doesn't make senseKobeStan said:Again go do the research look at the number of staff they have covering the entire West Coast vs just Florida or just Georgia. How on earth could the rankings not be biased? These sites don't get paid to get the rankings right They get paid to produce content for their subscribers who are mostly concentrated in the opposite corner of the country.
You are the definition of a doog focus on the thing that actually matters(wins and losses) form your own opinions about recruiting(which again matters a fucking ton) not chasing some impossible ranking that is positively correlated on winning
We are focused on winning not losing like punks to Bama, PSU or USC
Right now the only thing impossible is winning those games, not getting top ranked recruits
Why is it impossible? Hell USC and Bama are going off our lists now. We got to close. That's what we are after
I know the classes that Stanford won the conference with were ranked 9th 4th 3rd 6th 1st 11th and 2nd in the conference.
UCLA is since 2001 2nd behind USC in rankings and have they have been a bottom half of the conference program
The Gilby and Ty classes were ranked top 6 every year except 05 -
I don't follow recruitingKobeStan said:
Other than USC do they match Pac10/12 results? I would like to see this broken down.RaceBannon said:
So is it just dumb luck that the recruiting rankings match results rankings? That doesn't make senseKobeStan said:Again go do the research look at the number of staff they have covering the entire West Coast vs just Florida or just Georgia. How on earth could the rankings not be biased? These sites don't get paid to get the rankings right They get paid to produce content for their subscribers who are mostly concentrated in the opposite corner of the country.
You are the definition of a doog focus on the thing that actually matters(wins and losses) form your own opinions about recruiting(which again matters a fucking ton) not chasing some impossible ranking that is positively correlated on winning
We are focused on winning not losing like punks to Bama, PSU or USC
Right now the only thing impossible is winning those games, not getting top ranked recruits
Why is it impossible? Hell USC and Bama are going off our lists now. We got to close. That's what we are after
I know the classes that Stanford won the conference with were ranked 9th 4th 3rd 6th 1st 11th and 2nd in the conference.
UCLA is since 2001 2nd behind USC in rankings and have they have been a bottom half of the conference program
The Gilby and Ty classes were ranked top 6 every year except 05
-
Meet me in TemeculaRaceBannon said:
I don't follow recruitingKobeStan said:
Other than USC do they match Pac10/12 results? I would like to see this broken down.RaceBannon said:
So is it just dumb luck that the recruiting rankings match results rankings? That doesn't make senseKobeStan said:Again go do the research look at the number of staff they have covering the entire West Coast vs just Florida or just Georgia. How on earth could the rankings not be biased? These sites don't get paid to get the rankings right They get paid to produce content for their subscribers who are mostly concentrated in the opposite corner of the country.
You are the definition of a doog focus on the thing that actually matters(wins and losses) form your own opinions about recruiting(which again matters a fucking ton) not chasing some impossible ranking that is positively correlated on winning
We are focused on winning not losing like punks to Bama, PSU or USC
Right now the only thing impossible is winning those games, not getting top ranked recruits
Why is it impossible? Hell USC and Bama are going off our lists now. We got to close. That's what we are after
I know the classes that Stanford won the conference with were ranked 9th 4th 3rd 6th 1st 11th and 2nd in the conference.
UCLA is since 2001 2nd behind USC in rankings and have they have been a bottom half of the conference program
The Gilby and Ty classes were ranked top 6 every year except 05 -
He moved.WilburHooksHands said:
Meet me in TemeculaRaceBannon said:
I don't follow recruitingKobeStan said:
Other than USC do they match Pac10/12 results? I would like to see this broken down.RaceBannon said:
So is it just dumb luck that the recruiting rankings match results rankings? That doesn't make senseKobeStan said:Again go do the research look at the number of staff they have covering the entire West Coast vs just Florida or just Georgia. How on earth could the rankings not be biased? These sites don't get paid to get the rankings right They get paid to produce content for their subscribers who are mostly concentrated in the opposite corner of the country.
You are the definition of a doog focus on the thing that actually matters(wins and losses) form your own opinions about recruiting(which again matters a fucking ton) not chasing some impossible ranking that is positively correlated on winning
We are focused on winning not losing like punks to Bama, PSU or USC
Right now the only thing impossible is winning those games, not getting top ranked recruits
Why is it impossible? Hell USC and Bama are going off our lists now. We got to close. That's what we are after
I know the classes that Stanford won the conference with were ranked 9th 4th 3rd 6th 1st 11th and 2nd in the conference.
UCLA is since 2001 2nd behind USC in rankings and have they have been a bottom half of the conference program
The Gilby and Ty classes were ranked top 6 every year except 05 -
These recent bowl games have to be considered crisis level events to anyone interested in titles. The PSU lines that very visibly shat on UW weren't even good in the Big White Trash Opiate Addicted Retards Conference or whatever its called now.
Turns out fat slow people don't rush the passer so good. There's a reason edge rushers are the highest paid position after QB. This team would be just OK with a real schedule. Stop confusing playing against dogshit every week with having a nationally relevant team. Time to start expecting Pete to take big swings at little boys. Fucking offer Gee already you piece of shit. -
That's exactly what Pete is doing you dumb fuck! He's only recruiting who he thinks is the best of the best. Gee ain't getting a fucking offer until Pete knows he's one of the truly elite WR's out West. Forget the OKG shit. Just as a football player Gee's Sophomore film does not show enough speed for him to deserve an offer yet which is fine because he was a fucking SOPHOMORE. Any type of deep route he runs he's usually covered and has to make a 50-50 catch. Right now he's like a less muscled up, less vertically explosive Kasen Williams. For all any of you retards know he'll be another Justus Legg his Junior season and fall down the rankings from a 4-star to a 3-star. Just let if fucking play out! If he's a baller against real competition and improves his speed he'll get the offer. But don't say Petersen isn't trying to get the best because he is.SarkFanSixtyNine said:These recent bowl games have to be considered crisis level events to anyone interested in titles. The PSU lines that very visibly shat on UW weren't even good in the Big White Trash Opiate Addicted Retards Conference or whatever its called now.
Turns out fat slow people don't rush the passer so good. There's a reason edge rushers are the highest paid position after QB. This team would be just OK with a real schedule. Stop confusing playing against dogshit every week with having a nationally relevant team. Time to start expecting Pete to take big swings at little boys. Fucking offer Gee already you piece of shit. -
And yes, recruiting top-10 talent is absolutely necessary to winning a national championship but @KobeStan is absolutely right when he says West coast recruiting rankings are dragged down by the East Coast bias of ESPN rankings. As long as UW is bringing in top-15 classes and we can go down the list of UW "3-star" commits and say "he's not a 3-star and he's not a 3-star" then we are bringing in top-10 talent regardless of the 247 composite class ranking saying our class is #13 in the nation or whatever. 2018 class was a top 10 class. 2019 class is only half way done with a lot of big-fish still on the board. The O-line and D-line recruiting in this 2019 class will probably be the best we've seen since the Don James era.
-
@backthepack And all you can do his click "WTF" bitch because you can't formulate an argument against anything I just said. Maybe if I was still in high school I would "WTF" every one of your posts as well you little twat.
-
Sounds like you care.StrongArmCobra said:@backthepack And all you can do his click "WTF" bitch because you can't formulate an argument against anything I just said. Maybe if I was still in high school I would "WTF" every one of your posts as well you little twat.
-
Wtf for giving a fuck what the fudgepacks thinksStrongArmCobra said:@backthepack And all you can do his click "WTF" bitch because you can't formulate an argument against anything I just said. Maybe if I was still in high school I would "WTF" every one of your posts as well you little twat.
