Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is why Dennis won't let us have nice things

RaceBannon
RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,380 Founders Club
@KobeStan despite all overwhelming evidence to the contrary is here saying that rankings don't matter

It doesn't matter that top ten recruiting rankings correlate to top ten finishes. NO not at all

Then you pull out the ESPNSEC is biased and they only win natties because of East Coast bias blah fucking blah

Yet we saw our DAWGS up close against top ten classes and it fucking mattered. No bias just a fucking fact. We came up short where it mattered

Come on guys, get your shit together and clean it up out here

Do you want to answer Dennis' emails for a day?
«13

Comments

  • SarkFanSixtyNine
    SarkFanSixtyNine Member Posts: 373
    There's a huge amount of context people ignore when they belittle recruiting rankings. It's acceptable to have weaker recruiting rankings because you lock down NW studs early like Memelard who will get ranked lower than deserved because he won't play the recruiting game. It's unacceptable to have lower recruiting rankings because Pete missed on the real targets and then resorted to Dick Newton.


    Wisconsin fat boys lack FREE PUB, not talent. Stupid coaches with shitty undisciplined programs failing to capitalize on 5 star talent are not a sound indictment of the talent analysis. Talent alone dictates the ceiling of any program. Pete's recent class is his only one that comes close to nationally competitive and even then it's borderline. Yet this is considered by Doogs as more of a miracle than the expectation it needs to be. USC will only stay mediocre for so long. Must I remind you of what happened the last time that incompetent regime played UW? That game was won solely by recruiting. Once that program starts working like it should UW is hopelessly dead on the current trajectory.


    Does Pete even want to compete for national titles from a level playing field? Doesn't look like it to me. I think he'd rather surround himself with instantly compatible OKG's and hope to get lucky. Unless fans raise expectations Pete will stay comfortable and happily accept having a second tier team of nice polite gentlemen built for life. Maybe that's what you losers want as well.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,380 Founders Club

    There's a huge amount of context people ignore when they belittle recruiting rankings. It's acceptable to have weaker recruiting rankings because you lock down NW studs early like Memelard who will get ranked lower than deserved because he won't play the recruiting game. It's unacceptable to have lower recruiting rankings because Pete missed on the real targets and then resorted to Dick Newton.


    Wisconsin fat boys lack FREE PUB, not talent. Stupid coaches with shitty undisciplined programs failing to capitalize on 5 star talent are not a sound indictment of the talent analysis. Talent alone dictates the ceiling of any program. Pete's recent class is his only one that comes close to nationally competitive and even then it's borderline. Yet this is considered by Doogs as more of a miracle than the expectation it needs to be. USC will only stay mediocre for so long. Must I remind you of what happened the last time that incompetent regime played UW? That game was won solely by recruiting. Once that program starts working like it should UW is hopelessly dead on the current trajectory.


    Does Pete even want to compete for national titles from a level playing field? Doesn't look like it to me. I think he'd rather surround himself with instantly compatible OKG's and hope to get lucky. Unless fans raise expectations Pete will stay comfortable and happily accept having a second tier team of nice polite gentlemen built for life. Maybe that's what you losers want as well.

    Plus 1
  • KobeStan
    KobeStan Member Posts: 91
    Again go do the research look at the number of staff they have covering the entire West Coast vs just Florida or just Georgia. How on earth could the rankings not be biased? These sites don't get paid to get the rankings right They get paid to produce content for their subscribers who are mostly concentrated in the opposite corner of the country.

    You are the definition of a doog focus on the thing that actually matters(wins and losses) form your own opinions about recruiting(which again matters a fucking ton) not chasing some impossible ranking that is positively correlated on winning
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,380 Founders Club
    KobeStan said:

    Again go do the research look at the number of staff they have covering the entire West Coast vs just Florida or just Georgia. How on earth could the rankings not be biased? These sites don't get paid to get the rankings right They get paid to produce content for their subscribers who are mostly concentrated in the opposite corner of the country.

    You are the definition of a doog focus on the thing that actually matters(wins and losses) form your own opinions about recruiting(which again matters a fucking ton) not chasing some impossible ranking that is positively correlated on winning

    So is it just dumb luck that the recruiting rankings match results rankings? That doesn't make sense

    We are focused on winning not losing like punks to Bama, PSU or USC

    Right now the only thing impossible is winning those games, not getting top ranked recruits

    Why is it impossible? Hell USC and Bama are going off our lists now. We got to close. That's what we are after
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Recruiting is just
    pat_hm said:

    IT FUCKING MATTERS. DON'T EVER LET ANYONE TELL YOU DIFFERENT. ONLY LOSERS THINK IT DOESN'T MATTER.

    This.