Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The Standard For UW Football

1…1011131516…19

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    dnc said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    dnc said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    dnc said:

    I actually agree chances are CP finishes his UW career more accomplished than DJ, but he's got a ways to go to get there.

    We must keep fighting!!!

    That’s the thing, he can absolutely get there. But he’s gotta fucking get after it exactly like he did last year in recruiting (but better) for the next 3-4 years, and whatever in game shit is necessary.

    There is so much going right, so so much, we are so damn close. We’ll get there and it’ll be amazing when we do.
    I don't think he has to do better than last year. If we get 3-4 2018 recruiting classes, we natty, simple as that.
    I think you're basically right. I think last year with two additional guys is a Natty class: Togiai and Martin.

    The only worry is that we are systematically under-recruiting at particular positions and that creates a weird roster. I guess I would say - last year's class is good enough if we get Martin.

    But also - the catch here is that, for instance, next year - if we do what we SHOULD do, then we will be naturally higher because of Smalls, Hatchett, Ringo and the rest of our in-state class. But that would be 3 5-star guys.
    I'm not sure that we SHOULD get Smalls. Our history of getting 5 star in state talent sucks balls for as long as we have of tracking what actual 5 star in state talent is. On a national basis 5 stars aren't any more likely to stay in state than they are to leave home.

    I agree we should get Hatchett and Ringo. Going three or three would be fucking insane.
    God - this is what I don't understand... WHY SHOULDN'T WE?!?!?

    HE IS A FUCKING IN STATE KID WHO HAS US IN HIS TOP 3.

    JESUS FUCKING CHRIST.

    Why lower the fucking Standards?!?! We got Mike Lustyk. We can get anyone man. What does it hurt to set the expectations high? I really don't see it.

    Of course we should get 5-star in state guys. Those are the only 5 star guys we ever get. If we improve our hit rate from 0% to 60% that would make us formidable.
    I think 60% is very realistic. I'd say even 75%. But Smalls is a top 5 player in the nation with to my knowledge no real UW ties. He's a 50-50 type kid at best.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    haie said:

    If UW can make the playoffs in year 3 with a dreck quarterback they are more than capable of winning a *national championship* without needing to get lucky with a Heisman level one.

    This is one of the most retarded poasts I've ever read. You require a Heisman level QB to compete with a team like Bama. And even then you fall short, because your defense isn't SEC quality. And your lineman are nowhere near as gnarly as theirs. Everyone in every position on that team is the best of the best. Luck really would be the only shot you'd have of beating them. Or Auburn. Or most other SEC teams on any given Saturday.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • theknowledge
    theknowledge Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,936 Founders Club
    UW_Doog_Bot said:



    Seems like the majority of poasters expect the Pac12 championship or better. I'm not sure who is expecting less.

    Man my avatar is really fucking gay. Fits like a glove though. BTW reading Coker, Dennis and DNC say that we are so close to winning big and that so many things are going right in our program has officially ruptured my penis. That is all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    NorwegianHusky said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    haie said:

    If UW can make the playoffs in year 3 with a dreck quarterback they are more than capable of winning a *national championship* without needing to get lucky with a Heisman level one.

    This is one of the most retarded poasts I've ever read. You require a Heisman level QB to compete with a team like Bama. And even then you fall short, because your defense isn't SEC quality. And your lineman are nowhere near as gnarly as theirs. Everyone in every position on that team is the best of the best. Luck really would be the only shot you'd have of beating them. Or Auburn. Or most other SEC teams on any given Saturday.
    Only one SEC defense had a higher S&P+ rating than Washington's last year. Washington has had one of the best defenses in the country for three years running. HTH.
    Cool story bruh. We'll see how good your defense is in Atlanta. Or not. Either way it will be chinteresting.

    The serious programs in the Pac-12 would appreciate if you step your game up in the future. We are tired of carrying the banner for the conference every year. And if you can't be better, just start the PAC PAC PAC chant in your stadium when you see our winning scores on your trac phones. You are an embarrassment to football. Win something you fucking losers!

    Sincerely,

    A PROUD Pac-12 fan
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    WeakarmCobra said:

    Living in the past huh?

    At least it's in color.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    Does any of this matter with Browning at the helm?

    Feel like elite QB talent is a must, to create a scenario that has the Dawgs competing for a National Championship.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    What was the last Tier II program to win a national championship without an elite, generational QB?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter