Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
GOAT THREAD
Comments
-
Especially when it makes your opponents insanecreepycoug said:You gotta give some credit where it is due.
Advocating for our country's best interests is not a bad thing.
We don't need to be friends with everyone all the tim. They'll come back around because they have to. The US hasn't failed just yet.
What are they gonna do? Never speak to us again?
Even fucking stubborn dense China has to deal with us.
I don't like everything the guy has brought to the table, but I like his hard ass approach to previously entrenched issues. Why the fuck not? Being nice hasn't accomplished shit. When it does, then I'll advocate for nice. -
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream. -
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it. -
Current account deficit versus budget deficitDude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
External debt versus internal debt
Return on investment
Comparative advantage
It’s not even worth calling you out as a trumptastic imbecile anymore. I’ll just give you the topic areas that point out your trumpian ignorance. -
Where I live Can Am's are called fag wagons.2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it. -
2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it.
-
Agreed. But these Mavericks are bad ass.Swaye said:
Where I live Can Am's are called fag wagons.2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it.
-
I see where the imbalance is. Two wheels too tough.2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it. -
Come watch hondo embarrass himself in every thread
-
I have no idea wtf a can am is
I assume it's short for something but can't think of what that could be -
It's the Canadian American partnership agreement. Are you dumb?Pitchfork51 said:I have no idea wtf a can am is
-
Does the rig come with eyebrows that fall off on the trail?2001400ex said:
It's the Canadian American partnership agreement. Are you dumb?Pitchfork51 said:I have no idea wtf a can am is
-
3 wheeled fag mobile trike thing,Pitchfork51 said:I have no idea wtf a can am is
I assume it's short for something but can't think of what that could be -
Swaye said:
Does the rig come with eyebrows that fall off on the trail?2001400ex said:
It's the Canadian American partnership agreement. Are you dumb?Pitchfork51 said:I have no idea wtf a can am is
-
If I lived out in bumfuck nowheresville I would just buy a goddamned motorcycle. Pussies gonna pussy.
-
Because motorcycles are banned in TacTown.PurpleJ said:If I lived out in bumfuck nowheresville I would just buy a goddamned motorcycle. Pussies gonna pussy.
-
I'm not getting on a rainy hwy 16 with a bunch of soccer moms and asians. I don't have a death wish.
-
You sound scared. Hwy 16, except for the fucked up intersection at I5, is a nice ride.PurpleJ said:I'm not getting on a rainy hwy 16 with a bunch of soccer moms and asians. I don't have a death wish.
-
You should take a swan dive into the narrows.
-
PurpleJ said:
You should take a swan dive into the narrows.
-
Your knowledge of preferred transportation modalities in the homosexual community is elucidating.Sledog said: -
And he knows - that's where he picks up chicks.Swaye said:
Nope, it's accurate. Where I live everyone loves Trump. You have to drive into huge squalid crime riddled cities or California to find anyone who doesn't love Trump.insinceredawg said:
About 90% of this board has Trump's cock halfway up their ass. Fortunately this board is not an accurate representation of the real America, or is it?EwaDawg said:
Actually, his face belongs behind the mountain. You know, with shit falling out of the asses of actual presidents into his reality star mouth.PurpleJ said:
That is probably TOO GOOD for an actual POTUS (meaning shitting in trump's mouth). I know, I know, I know - something like 15% of Americans still support this fuck up.
Who would actually think there were that many idiots out there that are more ethically challenged than the donald? -
A trade imbalance stems from tariffs. Tariffs imposed on us, the USA. We can't sell our shit in (insert country here) because they tariff the fuck out of us, but we don't tariff them. So we (Trump) says hey - ease up on the tariffs, China says fuck off. So prior admins did just that. There is your trade imbalance and that's why it's bad. Trump is dealing with it unlike prior administrations.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
If there were true free trade, then a trade imbalance wouldn't be a big deal. Trade imbalance wouldn't even be a term in our vocabulary.
-
No there's a trade imbalance because American companies manufacturer shit in other countries because they don't give a shit about child labor, people work for the cost of a bowl of rice, and cause they can pollute all they want. Look at all the shit the Trump family manufacturers outside the country. It's a business decision and a cost thing.89ute said:
A trade imbalance stems from tariffs. Tariffs imposed on us, the USA. We can't sell our shit in (insert country here) because they tariff the fuck out of us, but we don't tariff them. So we (Trump) says hey - ease up on the tariffs, China says fuck off. So prior admins did just that. There is your trade imbalance and that's why it's bad. Trump is dealing with it unlike prior administrations.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
If there were true free trade, then a trade imbalance wouldn't be a big deal. Trade imbalance wouldn't even be a term in our vocabulary.
HTH -
You sound smart. Sledog and dude61 smart. What tariffs? What sectors? Wait until the wto hears your insights!89ute said:
A trade imbalance stems from tariffs. Tariffs imposed on us, the USA. We can't sell our shit in (insert country here) because they tariff the fuck out of us, but we don't tariff them. So we (Trump) says hey - ease up on the tariffs, China says fuck off. So prior admins did just that. There is your trade imbalance and that's why it's bad. Trump is dealing with it unlike prior administrations.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
If there were true free trade, then a trade imbalance wouldn't be a big deal. Trade imbalance wouldn't even be a term in our vocabulary.
Did you know Canada is a national security threat?
Did a Mexican or China man steal your job like Salem?
-
One thing I didn't predict about the Trump admin. That dick suckers like Race, sledog, OBK, etc. would align themselves with 2 communist countries and think ridding the world of a free market economy and adding tariffs to the goods we consume would be a good idea.CirrhosisDawg said:
You sound smart. Sledog and dude61 smart. What tariffs? What sectors? Wait until the wto hears your insights!89ute said:
A trade imbalance stems from tariffs. Tariffs imposed on us, the USA. We can't sell our shit in (insert country here) because they tariff the fuck out of us, but we don't tariff them. So we (Trump) says hey - ease up on the tariffs, China says fuck off. So prior admins did just that. There is your trade imbalance and that's why it's bad. Trump is dealing with it unlike prior administrations.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
If there were true free trade, then a trade imbalance wouldn't be a big deal. Trade imbalance wouldn't even be a term in our vocabulary.
Did you know Canada is a national security threat?
Did a Mexican or China man steal your job like Salem? -
This whole commie bullshit is hilarious
It's shows the international relations acumen of a retarded 3rd grader
Like hondo -
No. He leaves the meeting from Canada and shits on the PM for no reason and throws out the agreement. Then meets with Kim and has nothing but positive things to say and agrees to stop playing war in South Korea.RaceBannon said:This whole commie bullshit is hilarious
It's shows the international relations acumen of a retarded 3rd grader
Like hondo
If you can't see it, I can't help you. -
Sure. That's what a 3rd grader would say
A retarded one
