Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
GOAT THREAD
Comments
-
Especially when it makes your opponents insanecreepycoug said:You gotta give some credit where it is due.
Advocating for our country's best interests is not a bad thing.
We don't need to be friends with everyone all the tim. They'll come back around because they have to. The US hasn't failed just yet.
What are they gonna do? Never speak to us again?
Even fucking stubborn dense China has to deal with us.
I don't like everything the guy has brought to the table, but I like his hard ass approach to previously entrenched issues. Why the fuck not? Being nice hasn't accomplished shit. When it does, then I'll advocate for nice. -
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream. -
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it. -
Current account deficit versus budget deficitDude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
External debt versus internal debt
Return on investment
Comparative advantage
It’s not even worth calling you out as a trumptastic imbecile anymore. I’ll just give you the topic areas that point out your trumpian ignorance. -
Where I live Can Am's are called fag wagons.2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it. -
2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it.
-
Agreed. But these Mavericks are bad ass.Swaye said:
Where I live Can Am's are called fag wagons.2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it.
-
I see where the imbalance is. Two wheels too tough.2001400ex said:
Um. No. You don't have to finance trade imbalances with taxes or printing new money. Holy shit. You really said that?Dude61 said:
It's not suddenly an issue I care about. It' s been a problem since NAFTA was signed in 1994. Are continued and persistent trade imbalances a good thing? They have to be financed with taxes or printing new money. That only benefits the US govt and Wall Street, not Main St.2001400ex said:
Yes you've said that. You are saying trade imbalance is an issue. I'm asking you what the exact issue with the trade imbalance is. And then why this is suddenly an issue you care about.Dude61 said:
Trump is dealing with trade imbalance, something Obama the Avoider and Bush the Younger refused to do.2001400ex said:
You must have had your head buried in the sand too.Dude61 said:
Trump has always held the view of fair trade. Two years ago Obama the Avoider burried his head in the sand rather than deal with trade imbalance, like he did with most issues.2001400ex said:
That's what's awesome. You believe Trump's babble about being ripped off somehow. Because the free market Americans choose to buy foreign shit over our own shit.Dude61 said:Trump just stopped Canada and the EU ripping us off in trade and now he’s heading to Asia to end the Korean War.
How did you spend your weekend?
Where was this argument 2 years ago? Did something change in the last 2 years?
That being said. What exactly is the issue with trade imbalance?
You can't see clearly because you are covered with spooge from a 25 year globalist wet dream.
Main Street does benefit from trade imbalances. As there is increased competition and lower prices from increased trade. You'd think a supposed free market conservative would understand that.
Basically, we should let the free market decide where goods are produced. If China wants to pay their people a bowl of rice a day and pollute their shit, to sell us cheap garbage, and Americans want to buy that cheap garbage, who you are too tell them what to do? Or tax them for buying Chinese or Canadian shit?
BTW.... I'm on my way to buy a can am. So suck it. -
Come watch hondo embarrass himself in every thread
-
I have no idea wtf a can am is
I assume it's short for something but can't think of what that could be
