PM to BearsWon
Comments
-
Copy that. I was feeling ripped off but then you mentioned math. Now I just feel dumb.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Not if you know how to do sciencedflea said:
An econ degree is a BA degree, isn't it?UW_Doog_Bot said:
An article explaining some of thisYellowSnow said:
The end of WWII ended the Depression. Not the New Deal. We can all agree upon this.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For the record, lots of economists agree and that the New Deal was horrible policy. Video is a bit dry, but decent, and she's hot. So maybe even @Swaye will watch it on mute.YellowSnow said:
The conservatives at the time thought the POTUS in 1944 was the left wing appocolypse.Sledog said:The uber lefties on the board are appalled we attacked those poor hapless Germans who were just minding their own business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAgt_YCNuw
Of course, all the poly sci/social science majors will tell you that the New Deal was a huge success bc reasons...
FDR's death probably saved us all a lot of socialist bullshit.
That said,even ifit was not necessarily the best economic approach,it was still a political necessity. And long term, there's still a lot of long term benefit from legislation likeSStax free retirement incentives, FDIC.
And for Christ's sake, we can not forget the god damned damns. W/o Grand Coulee, Bonneville, and TVA, WWII takes a lot longer to win- i.e., no cheap and readily available electricity for aluminum and uranium/plutonium enrichment. Maybe, but that was hardly the reason for them being built, hindsight and tangential benefits.
p.s. My knowledge of economic history isn't from youtube. It's from my BS in Economics from UW and from the time I've spent doing economic reading/research. Far greater economists than me have theseopinionsvalid hypotheses backed by data. I'm just attempting to find things that are more entertaining than reading dry ass academis research papers for the rest of you.
Seriously though, they are different degrees(at UW). The BS is a lot more rigorous and you have to do a lot of actual maths and such. It's why I get paid to science stuff. With a BA I would have probably had to go get a Masters to do anything with like many of my friends who partied a little more in the BA program.
[The Bachelor of Science with a Major in Economics emphasizes the study of mathematics and quantitative techniques along with economics. The course of study requires a more intensive background in math and statistics, reflecting the quantitative character of modern economics. This program provides preparation for employment in technical and scientific areas and is appropriate for graduate studies in economics and related fields such as statistics, mathematics and finance.]
UW Economics Department stuff
p.s. my credentials aren't all that astonishing or important when I'm just reciting what is pretty common Economics pablum. It's like talking about supply and demand. I don't really need to be an expert. I can just appeal to a higher academis authority in the field. -
UW_Doog_Bot said:
Not if you know how to do sciencedflea said:
An econ degree is a BA degree, isn't it?UW_Doog_Bot said:
An article explaining some of thisYellowSnow said:
The end of WWII ended the Depression. Not the New Deal. We can all agree upon this.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For the record, lots of economists agree and that the New Deal was horrible policy. Video is a bit dry, but decent, and she's hot. So maybe even @Swaye will watch it on mute.YellowSnow said:
The conservatives at the time thought the POTUS in 1944 was the left wing appocolypse.Sledog said:The uber lefties on the board are appalled we attacked those poor hapless Germans who were just minding their own business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAgt_YCNuw
Of course, all the poly sci/social science majors will tell you that the New Deal was a huge success bc reasons...
FDR's death probably saved us all a lot of socialist bullshit.
That said,even ifit was not necessarily the best economic approach,it was still a political necessity. And long term, there's still a lot of long term benefit from legislation likeSStax free retirement incentives, FDIC.
And for Christ's sake, we can not forget the god damned damns. W/o Grand Coulee, Bonneville, and TVA, WWII takes a lot longer to win- i.e., no cheap and readily available electricity for aluminum and uranium/plutonium enrichment. Maybe, but that was hardly the reason for them being built, hindsight and tangential benefits.
p.s. My knowledge of economic history isn't from youtube. It's from my BS in Economics from UW and from the time I've spent doing economic reading/research. Far greater economists than me have theseopinionsvalid hypotheses backed by data. I'm just attempting to find things that are more entertaining than reading dry ass academis research papers for the rest of you.
Seriously though, they are different degrees(at UW). The BS is a lot more rigorous and you have to do a lot of actual maths and such. It's why I get paid to science stuff. With a BA I would have probably had to go get a Masters to do anything with like many of my friends who partied a little more in the BA program.
[The Bachelor of Science with a Major in Economics emphasizes the study of mathematics and quantitative techniques along with economics. The course of study requires a more intensive background in math and statistics, reflecting the quantitative character of modern economics. This program provides preparation for employment in technical and scientific areas and is appropriate for graduate studies in economics and related fields such as statistics, mathematics and finance.]
UW Economics Department stuff
p.s. my credentials aren't all that astonishing or important when I'm just reciting what is pretty common Economics pablum. It's like talking about supply and demand. I don't really need to be an expert. I can just appeal to a higher academis authority in the field.
-
Posting tits and ass pics is always an acceptable alternative.UW_Doog_Bot said:
An article explaining some of thisYellowSnow said:
The end of WWII ended the Depression. Not the New Deal. We can all agree upon this.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For the record, lots of economists agree and that the New Deal was horrible policy. Video is a bit dry, but decent, and she's hot. So maybe even @Swaye will watch it on mute.YellowSnow said:
The conservatives at the time thought the POTUS in 1944 was the left wing appocolypse.Sledog said:The uber lefties on the board are appalled we attacked those poor hapless Germans who were just minding their own business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAgt_YCNuw
Of course, all the poly sci/social science majors will tell you that the New Deal was a huge success bc reasons...
FDR's death probably saved us all a lot of socialist bullshit.
That said,even ifit was not necessarily the best economic approach,it was still a political necessity. And long term, there's still a lot of long term benefit from legislation likeSStax free retirement incentives, FDIC.
And for Christ's sake, we can not forget the god damned damns. W/o Grand Coulee, Bonneville, and TVA, WWII takes a lot longer to win- i.e., no cheap and readily available electricity for aluminum and uranium/plutonium enrichment. Maybe, but that was hardly the reason for them being built, hindsight and tangential benefits.
p.s. My knowledge of economic history isn't from youtube. It's from my BS in Economics from UW and from the time I've spent doing economic reading/research. Far greater economists than me have theseopinionsvalid hypotheses backed by data. I'm just attempting to find things that are more entertaining than reading dry ass academis research papers for the rest of you.
-
As History major who was told there would be no maff, I still had to take a couple of maffey related courses to graduate. One was I think Macro 101 and the other Astronomy 101. It was hard but I think I got passing grades. Now I am a pour.Swaye said:UW_Doog_Bot said:
Not if you know how to do sciencedflea said:
An econ degree is a BA degree, isn't it?UW_Doog_Bot said:
An article explaining some of thisYellowSnow said:
The end of WWII ended the Depression. Not the New Deal. We can all agree upon this.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For the record, lots of economists agree and that the New Deal was horrible policy. Video is a bit dry, but decent, and she's hot. So maybe even @Swaye will watch it on mute.YellowSnow said:
The conservatives at the time thought the POTUS in 1944 was the left wing appocolypse.Sledog said:The uber lefties on the board are appalled we attacked those poor hapless Germans who were just minding their own business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAgt_YCNuw
Of course, all the poly sci/social science majors will tell you that the New Deal was a huge success bc reasons...
FDR's death probably saved us all a lot of socialist bullshit.
That said,even ifit was not necessarily the best economic approach,it was still a political necessity. And long term, there's still a lot of long term benefit from legislation likeSStax free retirement incentives, FDIC.
And for Christ's sake, we can not forget the god damned damns. W/o Grand Coulee, Bonneville, and TVA, WWII takes a lot longer to win- i.e., no cheap and readily available electricity for aluminum and uranium/plutonium enrichment. Maybe, but that was hardly the reason for them being built, hindsight and tangential benefits.
p.s. My knowledge of economic history isn't from youtube. It's from my BS in Economics from UW and from the time I've spent doing economic reading/research. Far greater economists than me have theseopinionsvalid hypotheses backed by data. I'm just attempting to find things that are more entertaining than reading dry ass academis research papers for the rest of you.
Seriously though, they are different degrees(at UW). The BS is a lot more rigorous and you have to do a lot of actual maths and such. It's why I get paid to science stuff. With a BA I would have probably had to go get a Masters to do anything with like many of my friends who partied a little more in the BA program.
[The Bachelor of Science with a Major in Economics emphasizes the study of mathematics and quantitative techniques along with economics. The course of study requires a more intensive background in math and statistics, reflecting the quantitative character of modern economics. This program provides preparation for employment in technical and scientific areas and is appropriate for graduate studies in economics and related fields such as statistics, mathematics and finance.]
UW Economics Department stuff
p.s. my credentials aren't all that astonishing or important when I'm just reciting what is pretty common Economics pablum. It's like talking about supply and demand. I don't really need to be an expert. I can just appeal to a higher academis authority in the field.
-
The dams are the biggest poont in FDR's favor IMO. Not only did they greatly aid the war effort, they've paid for themselves many tims over in (mostly) clean energy since then.YellowSnow said:
WWII ended the Depression. Not the New Deal. We can all agree upon this.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For the record, lots of economists agree and that the New Deal was horrible policy. Video is a bit dry, but decent, and she's hot. So maybe even @Swaye will watch it on mute.YellowSnow said:
The conservatives at the time thought the POTUS in 1944 was the left wing appocolypse.Sledog said:The uber lefties on the board are appalled we attacked those poor hapless Germans who were just minding their own business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAgt_YCNuw
Of course, all the poly sci/social science majors will tell you that the New Deal was a huge success bc reasons...
FDR's death probably saved us all a lot of socialist bullshit.
That said, even if it was not necessarily the best economic approach, it was still a political necessity. And long term, there's still a lot of long term benefit from legislation like SS, FDIC.
And for Christ's sake, we can not forget the god damned damns. W/o Grand Coulee, Bonneville, and TVA, WWII takes a lot longer to win- i.e., no cheap and readily available electricity for aluminum and uranium/plutonium enrichment.
The environmental impact upon construction was obviously huge, but hydro power is nails after that. -
On the other side, FDR's war-era wage controls begat the mess of the health industry.
-
THANK YOU! Finally, someone around here gets it about the damned damns!dnc said:
The dams are the biggest poont in FDR's favor IMO. Not only did they greatly aid the war effort, they've paid for themselves many tims over in (mostly) clean energy since then.YellowSnow said:
WWII ended the Depression. Not the New Deal. We can all agree upon this.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For the record, lots of economists agree and that the New Deal was horrible policy. Video is a bit dry, but decent, and she's hot. So maybe even @Swaye will watch it on mute.YellowSnow said:
The conservatives at the time thought the POTUS in 1944 was the left wing appocolypse.Sledog said:The uber lefties on the board are appalled we attacked those poor hapless Germans who were just minding their own business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAgt_YCNuw
Of course, all the poly sci/social science majors will tell you that the New Deal was a huge success bc reasons...
FDR's death probably saved us all a lot of socialist bullshit.
That said, even if it was not necessarily the best economic approach, it was still a political necessity. And long term, there's still a lot of long term benefit from legislation like SS, FDIC.
And for Christ's sake, we can not forget the god damned damns. W/o Grand Coulee, Bonneville, and TVA, WWII takes a lot longer to win- i.e., no cheap and readily available electricity for aluminum and uranium/plutonium enrichment.
The environmental impact upon construction was obviously huge, but hydro power is nails after that. -
Truth! Health care connected to employer run plans is one of the biggest fucking blunders this country ever committed.GrundleStiltzkin said:On the other side, FDR's war-era wage controls begat the mess of the health industry.
-
I have had a lot of arguments with people who don't agree with that. We are still having that argument - Obama and Bush's stimulus versus RR or Trumps tax cuts and deregulationYellowSnow said:
WWII ended the Depression. Not the New Deal. We can all agree upon this.UW_Doog_Bot said:
For the record, lots of economists agree and that the New Deal was horrible policy. Video is a bit dry, but decent, and she's hot. So maybe even @Swaye will watch it on mute.YellowSnow said:
The conservatives at the time thought the POTUS in 1944 was the left wing appocolypse.Sledog said:The uber lefties on the board are appalled we attacked those poor hapless Germans who were just minding their own business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAgt_YCNuw
Of course, all the poly sci/social science majors will tell you that the New Deal was a huge success bc reasons...
FDR's death probably saved us all a lot of socialist bullshit.
That said, even if it was not necessarily the best economic approach, it was still a political necessity. And long term, there's still a lot of long term benefit from legislation like SS, FDIC.
And for Christ's sake, we can not forget the god damned damns. W/o Grand Coulee, Bonneville, and TVA, WWII takes a lot longer to win- i.e., no cheap and readily available electricity for aluminum and uranium/plutonium enrichment. -
And - some public works are more awesome than others
Obama's stimulus was supposed to go to jobs. I know for a fact that Washington state canceled construction projects and used the cash for pensions and unions






