Vegas sure likes our? Dwags
Comments
-
And besides that, every coach has losses that don't make sense. Nick Saban couldn't beat Hugh Freeze. Shit happens. Defining a coach by one loss is a good way to take Mike Riley over Pete Carroll.YellowSnow said:
He lost to Vince Young in Los Angeles.dnc said:
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
There was some degree of sarcasm chintended in my poast. I could go either way on PC being in the "good" or "great" category and am not prepared to die on a hill over it.dnc said:
And besides that, every coach has losses that don't make sense. Nick Saban couldn't beat Hugh Freeze. Shit happens. Defining a coach by one loss is a good way to take Mike Riley over Pete Carroll.YellowSnow said:
He lost to Vince Young in Los Angeles.dnc said:
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc. -
Fell so in love with the Bush/Leinart show they forgot about defense. Their D sucked that year and Texas, mainly Vince Young, embarrassed it. A supposed all time team who's defense full of 5* talent looked small and slow compared to a quarterback...a rare one but still.YellowSnow said:
He lost to Mack Brown in Los Angeles.dnc said:
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc.
I agree...good not great. -
That's what happens when you're a huge faggot.dflea said:Mosster.
Struggling. -
Or just look at Fresno State putting up 42 in the coliseum a month prior.chuck said:
Fell so in love with the Bush/Leinart show they forgot about defense. Their D sucked that year and Texas, mainly Vince Young, embarrassed it. A supposed all time team who's defense full of 5* talent looked small and slow compared to a quarterback...a rare one but still.YellowSnow said:
He lost to Mack Brown in Los Angeles.dnc said:
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc.
I agree...good not great. -
Belotti would be UW's second best coach since color TV. Sweetheart.RaceBannon said:
Same as Oregon. USC's run was better. By a lotMosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
Bellotti was pedestrian -
The football school of Los Angeles does better than a school in Eugene, Oregon?dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc.
IS Coke greater than Pepsi?
You're actually retarded. -
Still struggling I see.Mosster47 said:
Belotti would be UW's second best coach since color TV. Sweetheart.RaceBannon said:
Same as Oregon. USC's run was better. By a lotMosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
Bellotti was pedestrian -
A great Vincanity story. A guy I coach with coached against Vince in a playoff game in high school in Houston. Vince was so mentally inept they had to write the play down on a Post-it note and run it in to him so he could remember the play.chuck said:
Fell so in love with the Bush/Leinart show they forgot about defense. Their D sucked that year and Texas, mainly Vince Young, embarrassed it. A supposed all time team who's defense full of 5* talent looked small and slow compared to a quarterback...a rare one but still.YellowSnow said:
He lost to Mack Brown in Los Angeles.dnc said:
Pete Carroll was a great CFB coachYellowSnow said:
USC being a Mt Rushmore school can win a natty with a good (but not all time greats) coach- i.e., Pete Carroll. Oregon and UW are schools that need all the stars to align + HOF type of corch. Fortunately, USC has only made 1 good hire in the past 40 years and that was just dumb luck.dnc said:Oh since you like 10 win seasons.
USC in the last 25 years: 11 ten win seasons (4 outside the Carroll run)
Oregon in the last 25 years: 10 ten win seasons (4 outside the Kelly/Helfrich run)
SC wins by literally every possible metric, winning percentage, top 10 finishes, top 5 finishes, significant bowl wins, national championships, etc.
I agree...good not great.
Real life. -
Fuck offMosster47 said:
Belotti would be UW's second best coach since color TV. Sweetheart.RaceBannon said:
Same as Oregon. USC's run was better. By a lotMosster47 said:
Pete had a tremendous seven year run. Outside of that USC has been pedestrian. They only had 1.5, btw.RaceBannon said:
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
Bellotti was pedestrian
