Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to all the Fast Strategy kids we won't be offering

«1

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,216 Founders Club
    First thing I thought of when I saw this twat was DDY's observation that we are unfairly denying some fast strategy kids the obvious bennefits of Pete's program.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    First thing I thought of when I saw this twat was DDY's observation that we are unfairly denying some fast strategy kids the obvious bennefits of Pete's program.

    We should be able to take 2-3 kids per year that does not fit the OKG
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855

    First thing I thought of when I saw this twat was DDY's observation that we are unfairly denying some fast strategy kids the obvious bennefits of Pete's program.

    We should be able to take 2-3 kids per year that does not fit the OKG
    Poison the well water? Get fucked dude.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    First/2nd round picks that have played to win the game:

    Herm Edwards : a million

    Everyone else: zero
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Gwad said:

    First thing I thought of when I saw this twat was DDY's observation that we are unfairly denying some fast strategy kids the obvious bennefits of Pete's program.

    We should be able to take 2-3 kids per year that does not fit the OKG
    Poison the well water? Get fucked dude.
    Really.... even 2-3 kids?
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

    Gwad said:

    First thing I thought of when I saw this twat was DDY's observation that we are unfairly denying some fast strategy kids the obvious bennefits of Pete's program.

    We should be able to take 2-3 kids per year that does not fit the OKG
    Poison the well water? Get fucked dude.
    Really.... even 2-3 kids?
    Zero. Fuck em. Didn't take the Chiefs long to dump that fukwit Marcus Peters. Rams will dump him too. When you're talking cancer two or three tumors are two or three too many.
  • pat_hm
    pat_hm Member Posts: 941
    Oregon recruits strictly fast strategy...how many guys did they put into the league this year???
  • pat_hm
    pat_hm Member Posts: 941
    Gladstone said:

    pat_hm said:

    I also think it’s easy to look at 247 and see these guys and get upset weren’t not offering but we don’t know the real story. Petersen does his homework. There’s a reason. The recruiting has improved every season and with that the # of guys entering the league will only increase. We’re talking 10 next year.

    Agreed. Well said.
    pat_hm said:


    If that’s not enough to convince some kid to attend UW over USC/Oregon then they’re not worth the time to begin with.

    Doogism.
    Have any of you actually had conversations with said kids? I have. Oregon knows what they want to hear and they eat it up. You mean I can smoke weed and play Xbox in the locker room and wear cool uniforms and get Jordan’s SIGN ME UP! That’s why I mean. Petersen isn’t going to play that game so why waste the time? Do I think he could lighten up a bit and have more fun with it? Yes. Absolutely. I think we started to see that a bit this past class. I just believe It’s a lost cause wasting resources on “talent” that thinks so short term. Coach Pete agrees with me. And clearly programs like Oregon and USC either 1) don’t tell them the entire truth or 2) are banking on their god given talent and will deal with the other issues in the future. The risk is massive underachievement and attrition.

    I’m sorry but I like the Will Dissly’s in the program. They create the culture and expection. Treshawns don’t.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    pat_hm said:

    Gladstone said:

    pat_hm said:

    I also think it’s easy to look at 247 and see these guys and get upset weren’t not offering but we don’t know the real story. Petersen does his homework. There’s a reason. The recruiting has improved every season and with that the # of guys entering the league will only increase. We’re talking 10 next year.

    Agreed. Well said.
    pat_hm said:


    If that’s not enough to convince some kid to attend UW over USC/Oregon then they’re not worth the time to begin with.

    Doogism.
    Have any of you actually had conversations with said kids? I have. Oregon knows what they want to hear and they eat it up. You mean I can smoke weed and play Xbox in the locker room and wear cool uniforms and get Jordan’s SIGN ME UP! That’s why I mean. Petersen isn’t going to play that game so why waste the time? Do I think he could lighten up a bit and have more fun with it? Yes. Absolutely. I think we started to see that a bit this past class. I just believe It’s a lost cause wasting resources on “talent” that thinks so short term. Coach Pete agrees with me. And clearly programs like Oregon and USC either 1) don’t tell them the entire truth or 2) are banking on their god given talent and will deal with the other issues in the future. The risk is massive underachievement and attrition.

    I’m sorry but I like the Will Dissly’s in the program. They create the culture and expection. Treshawns don’t.
    I like Budda Bakers also!

    Why can’t we have both?
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Aren't a lot of poly players fast strategy?
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Idk, taking a risk with 1-2 should not be that bad. I rather have insanity talented kid that is little fucked up in the head than players like kyler manu, John turner, Michael Neal
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    I expect DDY to come in guns blazing in 3, 2, 1 to learn y'all....some of the takes in this thread are extremely naive and borderline racist.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662

    I expect DDY to come in guns blazing in 3, 2, 1 to learn y'all....some of the takes in this thread are extremely naive and borderline racist.


    That kids from shitty areas are generally dumb as fuck and likely to cause trouble?
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    I expect DDY to come in guns blazing in 3, 2, 1 to learn y'all....some of the takes in this thread are extremely naive and borderline racist.

    HH is predominantly white, so racism is just a natural thang
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662

    I expect DDY to come in guns blazing in 3, 2, 1 to learn y'all....some of the takes in this thread are extremely naive and borderline racist.

    HH is predominantly white, so racism is just a natural thang
    WMNJ
  • pat_hm
    pat_hm Member Posts: 941

    pat_hm said:

    Gladstone said:

    pat_hm said:

    I also think it’s easy to look at 247 and see these guys and get upset weren’t not offering but we don’t know the real story. Petersen does his homework. There’s a reason. The recruiting has improved every season and with that the # of guys entering the league will only increase. We’re talking 10 next year.

    Agreed. Well said.
    pat_hm said:


    If that’s not enough to convince some kid to attend UW over USC/Oregon then they’re not worth the time to begin with.

    Doogism.
    Have any of you actually had conversations with said kids? I have. Oregon knows what they want to hear and they eat it up. You mean I can smoke weed and play Xbox in the locker room and wear cool uniforms and get Jordan’s SIGN ME UP! That’s why I mean. Petersen isn’t going to play that game so why waste the time? Do I think he could lighten up a bit and have more fun with it? Yes. Absolutely. I think we started to see that a bit this past class. I just believe It’s a lost cause wasting resources on “talent” that thinks so short term. Coach Pete agrees with me. And clearly programs like Oregon and USC either 1) don’t tell them the entire truth or 2) are banking on their god given talent and will deal with the other issues in the future. The risk is massive underachievement and attrition.

    I’m sorry but I like the Will Dissly’s in the program. They create the culture and expection. Treshawns don’t.
    I like Budda Bakers also!

    Why can’t we have both?
    If you consider Budda Baker and Kevin King fast strategy then we’re talking apples and oranges here. My definition is completely different than yours then. Of course I love those guys. But Bellevue and Bishop O’Dowd are light years different than some of the high schools /areas down in Southern California. Those are palaces compared to Hawthorne, Compton and Long Beach. I remember seeing a picture of Budda in Hawaii with the Bowman’s when he was in HS; the kids I’ve worked with haven’t even been to Santa Monica before and they live in LA...

    It’s not hard to spot a cancer. Go watch Tresahwns commitment video and tell why you think he would have been a positive influence on this team. Go read the quotes by Deommore Lenoir this offseason. There are reasons we don’t bring certain personalities into this culture. See why James Osborne has said about ego’s. This is why I’m eluding to. The guys who’s only goal is to get to the NFL in three years and get paid. Cancers.
  • pat_hm
    pat_hm Member Posts: 941

    Idk, taking a risk with 1-2 should not be that bad. I rather have insanity talented kid that is little fucked up in the head than players like kyler manu, John turner, Michael Neal

    Go watch the Ted talk on givers and takers and you’ll see why Petersen chooses Will Dissly over Treshawn Harrison.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    pat_hm said:

    Idk, taking a risk with 1-2 should not be that bad. I rather have insanity talented kid that is little fucked up in the head than players like kyler manu, John turner, Michael Neal

    Go watch the Ted talk on givers and takers and you’ll see why Petersen chooses Will Dissly over Treshawn Harrison.
    no
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840

    pat_hm said:

    Gladstone said:

    pat_hm said:

    I also think it’s easy to look at 247 and see these guys and get upset weren’t not offering but we don’t know the real story. Petersen does his homework. There’s a reason. The recruiting has improved every season and with that the # of guys entering the league will only increase. We’re talking 10 next year.

    Agreed. Well said.
    pat_hm said:


    If that’s not enough to convince some kid to attend UW over USC/Oregon then they’re not worth the time to begin with.

    Doogism.
    Have any of you actually had conversations with said kids? I have. Oregon knows what they want to hear and they eat it up. You mean I can smoke weed and play Xbox in the locker room and wear cool uniforms and get Jordan’s SIGN ME UP! That’s why I mean. Petersen isn’t going to play that game so why waste the time? Do I think he could lighten up a bit and have more fun with it? Yes. Absolutely. I think we started to see that a bit this past class. I just believe It’s a lost cause wasting resources on “talent” that thinks so short term. Coach Pete agrees with me. And clearly programs like Oregon and USC either 1) don’t tell them the entire truth or 2) are banking on their god given talent and will deal with the other issues in the future. The risk is massive underachievement and attrition.

    I’m sorry but I like the Will Dissly’s in the program. They create the culture and expection. Treshawns don’t.
    I like Budda Bakers also!

    Why can’t we have both?
    Hate to state the obvious, but we have had both, since both Budda and Dissly played here.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    pat_hm said:

    I expect DDY to come in guns blazing in 3, 2, 1 to learn y'all....some of the takes in this thread are extremely naive and borderline racist.

    This entire message board is naive and borderline racist. You have people starting threads after we offered a kid with “(dark skinned)” in parenthesis. It’s embarrassing. It’s almost like the majority of posters have never left Seattle/Western Washington which isn’t exactly the cradle of diversity.
    I agree with this. It is one thing to be fearless in discussing things that can't be talked about elsewhere because they will be shouted down with (unfair) charges of racism, like the fast strategy/slow strategy stuff. A lot of the stuff on here isn't in that category. I actually believe most of it is satirical and/or in jest, but it is still a bad look. I've been guilty of that at times, for sure.