Video analysis: UW's 3rd down production on offense in 2017
Comments
-
I love you but you're afucking idiot when it comes to Locker.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Wrong. Keith was beaten to shit his junior year and everyone blamed him rather than the obvious problem which was the OL.dnc said:
Keith was great as a sophomore and loved for it, then crapped on when he sucked his junior and senior years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We all know it. Jake is basically a shitty, choke artist Keith Price. At least Keith played well in SOME pressure situations.BaldwinIV said:If Jake was black he'd be a pariah. It amazes me how much slack he gets from the general doog population. I mean ffs go to the ASU and Stanford games in the OP vid. Or fucking Rutgers game. How can he be defended so?
Nuke Seattle.
Keith was relentlessly crapped on by Husky fans.
I'll take sophomore Keith over any year of Browning but by the middle of his junior year he was so PTSD'd by Sark's inability to protect him from getting hit incessantly that he was pretty shitty.
In Jake's case, he is the MAJOR FUCKING WEAK POINT and the obvious strong point is Gaskin, but people act like Jake is a fucking Heisman candidate and Gaskin is a serviceable back.
It's complete fucking insanity.
Also, we win the Natty in '16 with Locker, Tui and maybe a healthy Price. Fuck - even Stanback. I've never seen a player be so loved for being so shit.
Jake every game makes like 2 real good throws, the rest are usually average. He also cocks up third downs and throws a bunch of bullshit and would-be pick sixes.
And because Pete is a fucking amazing coach and we have Myles on offense everyone attributes our wins to him.
We would literally be better with Haener or Myles. Jake is a practice player.
-
But browning sucks more, at least price made a play once in a whileRoadDawg55 said:
Price sucked. Browning also sucks.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Wrong. Keith was beaten to shit his junior year and everyone blamed him rather than the obvious problem which was the OL.dnc said:
Keith was great as a sophomore and loved for it, then crapped on when he sucked his junior and senior years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We all know it. Jake is basically a shitty, choke artist Keith Price. At least Keith played well in SOME pressure situations.BaldwinIV said:If Jake was black he'd be a pariah. It amazes me how much slack he gets from the general doog population. I mean ffs go to the ASU and Stanford games in the OP vid. Or fucking Rutgers game. How can he be defended so?
Nuke Seattle.
Keith was relentlessly crapped on by Husky fans.
I'll take sophomore Keith over any year of Browning but by the middle of his junior year he was so PTSD'd by Sark's inability to protect him from getting hit incessantly that he was pretty shitty.
In Jake's case, he is the MAJOR FUCKING WEAK POINT and the obvious strong point is Gaskin, but people act like Jake is a fucking Heisman candidate and Gaskin is a serviceable back.
It's complete fucking insanity.
Also, we win the Natty in '16 with Locker, Tui and maybe a healthy Price. Fuck - even Stanback. I've never seen a player be so loved for being so shit.
Jake every game makes like 2 real good throws, the rest are usually average. He also cocks up third downs and throws a bunch of bullshit and would-be pick sixes.
And because Pete is a fucking amazing coach and we have Myles on offense everyone attributes our wins to him.
We would literally be better with Haener or Myles. Jake is a practice player. -
I know it’s crazy around here to suggest anything positive about Locker but Dennis is right.
Locker got shit coaching as a QB and my guess is the whole OKG thing would have been right up his alley. His physical abilities are head and shoulders above Jake’s. His ability to create with his legs would have created opportunities for the offense against an Alabama that Browning never could dream of.
Even if you want to disagree with the length of what Dennis called out, you are a blinded idiot if you can’t see the difference between Browning and Locker. -
I find it amusing that Price and Browning are being compared now ... they are largely comparable players. Price’s ceiling was competing for a conference title with a really good team. Browning’s ceiling is basically in that range. Yet there used to be a real vocal group about how great Price was.
-
Of course there's plenty of differences between Locker and Browning, they're basically polar opposites.Tequilla said:I know it’s crazy around here to suggest anything positive about Locker but Dennis is right.
Locker got shit coaching as a QB and my guess is the whole OKG thing would have been right up his alley. His physical abilities are head and shoulders above Jake’s. His ability to create with his legs would have created opportunities for the offense against an Alabama that Browning never could dream of.
Even if you want to disagree with the length of what Dennis called out, you are a blinded idiot if you can’t see the difference between Browning and Locker.
Locker completed 55% of his passes as a 5th year senior. Yeah he probably could have developed a little better under Pete. If we're doing a straight up Locker for browning trade into 2016 then you're talking a redshirt freshman or true sophomore Locker. You're kidding yourself if you think he was winning a Natty at that point.
Fuck, he was never winning a national championship for anybody whose offense valued throwing the football. -
Every time Price fucked up he'd do that gay fake limp to the sideline. Pissed me off. They both suck ballz IMO
-
I honestly don’t care about completion percentage ... that’d improve strictly with better coaching and talent around him.
Locker was at worst a gamer in critical situations ... a polar opposite of Browning
Your disdain of Locker clouds your judgement here
Locker in ‘16 with this team gives us a lot least a puncher’s chance against Bama
Locker in ‘17 wins the P12 rather easily -
I don't have disdain for Locker. I love the kid. I'm probably the most pro Locker/Jesus guy on this bored. But he was never a good QB. He was wildly inaccurate. He didn't make good decisions.Tequilla said:I honestly don’t care about completion percentage ... that’d improve strictly with better coaching and talent around him.
Locker was at worst a gamer in critical situations ... a polar opposite of Browning
Your disdain of Locker clouds your judgement here
Locker in ‘16 with this team gives us a lot least a puncher’s chance against Bama
Locker in ‘17 wins the P12 rather easily
Forget winning the national title, Locker would have never started a game for Petersen save maybe in 2014. Pete values two things in QB's above all else - accuracy and ability to grasp the offense. Locker would have failed at both.
IR, YK. -
Locker vs Lindquist would be a better position battle then Browning vs no one. The dawgman articles would be on another level of doog.
-
Locker was a shit QB with a brain of straw, but he wasn't a pussy./
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9BeXX6norw
Pretty sure Browning would have literally died if that happened to him.





