Round 1 (60's Groups) - #2 Rolling Stones vs #15 Crosby, Stills and Nash (and Young?)




Round 1 (60's Groups) - #2 Rolling Stones vs #15 Crosby, Stills and Nash (and Young?) 42 votes
Comments
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
-
# 2 The Rolling StonesThis will be a fucking blowout.
-
#15 Crosby, Stills, and NashEither I never got into the Stones or I heard every song way too many times by the age of 5 and it was over
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
There are more Rolling Stones songs than what is on Hot Rocks.joeEDangerously said:Either I never got into the Stones or I heard every song way too many times by the age of 5 and it was over
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
or Hot Rocks IIYellowSnow said:
There are more Rolling Stones songs than what is on Hot Rocks.joeEDangerously said:Either I never got into the Stones or I heard every song way too many times by the age of 5 and it was over
-
#15 Crosby, Stills, and NashRolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stonesoregonblitzkrieg said:
Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Oh schnapp!Southerndawg said:oregonblitzkrieg said:Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Holy fuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stonesoregonblitzkrieg said:
Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
I'm hearing you can get the entire Stone's catalog on CD from Amazon at reasonable prices.dnc said:oregonblitzkrieg said:Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
#15 Crosby, Stills, and Nash
Most overrated rock n roll band of all tim.dflea said:
Holy fuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stonesoregonblitzkrieg said:
Most overrated rock n roll band of all tim.dflea said:
Holy fuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Sure, faggot.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Most overrated rock n roll band of all tim.dflea said:
Holy fuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Early stones >>>>>>> Whatever modern bullshit they've debuted.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Most overrated rock n roll band of all tim.dflea said:
Holy fuck.oregonblitzkrieg said:Rolling Stones = 60's buttrock IMO. Like the 60's version of Warrant or some other shit band but one that made it bigger due to the charisma of the band members and the tabloid circus of their private lives. Never heard a song from them that really caught on with me. So it's Crosby by default.
-
# 2 The Rolling StonesStones are Kobe, Wilt, Kareem status.
CSN&Y is Doug Christie.
-
# 2 The Rolling StonesThere are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots. -
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Some oversimplification here, but the poont becomes mor valid post Exile. Mick is the OG bad boy front man in Rock and everyone that came thereafter owes him a debt.Dennis_DeYoung said:There are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots. -
# 2 The Rolling Stones
I’m talking about songwriting. Mick’s direction always led to Ruby Tuesday, Satanic Majesty’s and Shattered.YellowSnow said:
Some oversimplification here, but the poont becomes mor valid post Exile. Mick is the OG bad boy front man in Rock and everyone that came thereafter owes him a debt.Dennis_DeYoung said:There are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots.
Keith’s songwriting produced Street Fighting Man, Gimmie Shelter, etc.
Mick is a truly great frontman. -
# 2 The Rolling Stones
You know what fucking crazy though about Mick following the trendy bands in 1966- 67, is that "Ruby Tuesday / Let's Spend The Night Together" might have been better than anything the Beatles did on Pepper or Magical Mystery Tour. It's one of the greatest double A sides ever. And Between the Buttons and Stanic's Majesties are loaded with great Stones "deep" tracks that many here have never fucking heard. 2000 man is fucking amazing.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I’m talking about songwriting. Mick’s direction always led to Ruby Tuesday, Satanic Majesty’s and Shattered.YellowSnow said:
Some oversimplification here, but the poont becomes mor valid post Exile. Mick is the OG bad boy front man in Rock and everyone that came thereafter owes him a debt.Dennis_DeYoung said:There are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots.
Keith’s songwriting produced Street Fighting Man, Gimmie Shelter, etc.
Mick is a truly great frontman. -
# 2 The Rolling StonesCrosby Stills Nash and Done
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Stone Temple Pilots were amazing. I wish I would have seen them live.Dennis_DeYoung said:There are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots. -
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Gate.RoadDawg55 said:
Stone Temple Pilots were amazing. I wish I would have seen them live.Dennis_DeYoung said:There are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots. -
# 2 The Rolling Stones
I actually saw them open for MegaDeth in the early 90's before anyone knew who they were. I remember thinking to myself, I hope that lead singer up there dies of an overdose one day.RoadDawg55 said:
Stone Temple Pilots were amazing. I wish I would have seen them live.Dennis_DeYoung said:There are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots.
They were fucking terrible live. Tbh, so was Megadeth. -
#15 Crosby, Stills, and NashVelvet Revolver had some cool shit though.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Agree.BleachedAnusDawg said:Velvet Revolver had some cool shit though.
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Also saw Stone Temple Pilots live opening for someone else, did not think enough of them to even wish death upon them(safe post). Went and waited in the shortened beer line instead.Swaye said:
I actually saw them open for MegaDeth in the early 90's before anyone knew who they were. I remember thinking to myself, I hope that lead singer up there dies of an overdose one day.RoadDawg55 said:
Stone Temple Pilots were amazing. I wish I would have seen them live.Dennis_DeYoung said:There are two Rolling Stoneses on some level: the Mick Stones which is just “let’s do what everyone else is doing” and the Keith Stones which produced all their classic work.
If you just take the Keith Stones, they are as good as anyone... the Mick Stones are basically Stone Temple Pilots.
They were fucking terrible live. Tbh, so was Megadeth.
Saw Megadeath live once but maybe in the mid 2000's? with Iron Maiden? Can't remember. Also can't remember if it was their original line up or not. Either way, they were really good. -
# 2 The Rolling StonesCSN&Y had exactly two good songs (Judy Blue Eyes and Southern Cross), neither of which would crack the Stones' Top Ten
-
# 2 The Rolling Stones
Woodstock was good. Wooden Ships was good. Ohio was actually a CSNY song and is incredible.BearsWiin said:CSN&Y had exactly two good songs (Judy Blue Eyes and Southern Cross), neither of which would crack the Stones' Top Ten
But you're mostly right. CSN were mostly undeserving of Young's assistance, as he repeatedly realized. They'd do well in a singer/ songwriter battle with the likes of Jim Croce, Cat Stevens, James Taylor etc.