Oregon scores a TD at the end of the 1st and runs back the opening kickoff at the start of the 2nd.
Comments
-
When they came for my Prime 2 Day shipping, you said nothing.oregonblitzkrieg said:This Oregon initiative is exactly what left wing fascists want on a national scale. A total revoking of your 2nd amendment rights. Some fuckeyed piece of shit in Florida shoots up a school and they want to take away the guns of law abiding citizens of Oregon. It's an excuse to seize more power.
-
The initiative calls everything an assault weapon. It's written so badly I'm not sure why I'm wasting my energy on it. However it's Oregon so any poorly written legislation that lets FMB's and Hondo's of the world feel good, has a good chance to pass.GrundleStiltzkin said:“We recognize that there are perfectly legitimate uses of guns for self-protection and hunting that make a lot of sense,” said Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana of Congregation Beth Israel and one of petitioners.
“But assault weapons are not used for either of those purposes. Many of these weapons exist only for killing and do not belong in civilian hands.”
If you don't like guns, fine, but don't make shit up. Something like 10 million AR-15s alone exist in private hands.
And speaking of making shit up.AR-15 rifles and their cousins are special because although they are semi-automatic weapons and therefore only fire one bullet each time the trigger is pulled, they are known for being accurate and easy to modify with accessories such as extended magazines, to shoot hundreds of bullets without reloading, and bump stocks, to allow faster shooting. -
Careful many here idolize those very types of governments and people and want it to happen here.oregonblitzkrieg said:
-
WTF are you babbling about? Portland, Salem, Eugene, Bend, and Ashland are extremely liberal. That's the state.salemcoog said:
This could be further from the truth. Portland proper controls everything and Portland is about 70% liberal and hate guns of all sorts. It also has 5 X the population of everywhere else combined. If they get the 88,000 sigs, this will pass.greenblood said:It still has a ways to go. It still has to get the signatures to get put on the ballot, then Oregonians have to actually vote it in. I don't think they are going to get the votes needed.
They absolutely say could be surrendered. There is no way this gets voted in. People know that legislation like this opens pandora's box on what other types of guns could be banned. It's not outside the realm of possibilities that 20 years from now assault weapon bans from this legislation will be broaden to semi auto hand guns, then to hand guns, then to rifles and shot guns. Pretty soon, Oregonians will have to defend themselves like Swaye's people did, with the classic bow and arrow.
Farmers and the rest of rural Oregon will have 98% voter turnout over this bill. Hipsters/losers in Portland and Eugene won't have a high enough turnout to overcome that.
However this will end up being the Dem's worst nightmare if it gets on the ballot. In Oregon, Conservatives sit on the sidelines as they have known that it doesn't matter how they vote as whatever Portland libtard wants will be voted in for the last 30 plus years.
However THIS will energize them like no other time in History and the Dems in other areas of the State outside of Portland will have this to reckon with and it may just cook their Gooses.
You think Medford, K Falls, and Roseburg are going to impact or carry the state? All shit holes as Donnie would say. I know, I've lived in two other them for long periods of time.
The group think in those tiny places are 100% the opposite of what actually happens at the polls. -
OBK didn't even read the bill and he's triggered again.oregonblitzkrieg said:This Oregon initiative is exactly what left wing fascists want on a national scale. A total revoking of your 2nd amendment rights. Some fuckeyed piece of shit in Florida shoots up a school and they want to take away the guns of law abiding citizens of Oregon. It's an excuse to seize more power. The left wing has already shown its true character in the weaponizing of the FBI, DOJ, IRS and other government institutions. Now they want your guns.
-
You don't read well. And you don't understand legislative process. People said the exact same about the I 594 in Washington and did they take any guns with that legislation?salemcoog said:
The initiative calls everything an assault weapon. It's written so badly I'm not sure why I'm wasting my energy on it. However it's Oregon so any poorly written legislation that lets FMB's and Hondo's of the world feel good, has a good chance to pass.GrundleStiltzkin said:“We recognize that there are perfectly legitimate uses of guns for self-protection and hunting that make a lot of sense,” said Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana of Congregation Beth Israel and one of petitioners.
“But assault weapons are not used for either of those purposes. Many of these weapons exist only for killing and do not belong in civilian hands.”
If you don't like guns, fine, but don't make shit up. Something like 10 million AR-15s alone exist in private hands.
And speaking of making shit up.AR-15 rifles and their cousins are special because although they are semi-automatic weapons and therefore only fire one bullet each time the trigger is pulled, they are known for being accurate and easy to modify with accessories such as extended magazines, to shoot hundreds of bullets without reloading, and bump stocks, to allow faster shooting.
It's sheep like you, OBK, and sledog that get triggered anytime anyone says anything about gun control, that will actually cause guns to be confiscated. -
-
Mosster47 said:
WTF are you babbling about? Portland, Salem, Eugene, Bend, and Ashland are extremely liberal. That's the state.salemcoog said:
This could be further from the truth. Portland proper controls everything and Portland is about 70% liberal and hate guns of all sorts. It also has 5 X the population of everywhere else combined. If they get the 88,000 sigs, this will pass.greenblood said:It still has a ways to go. It still has to get the signatures to get put on the ballot, then Oregonians have to actually vote it in. I don't think they are going to get the votes needed.
They absolutely say could be surrendered. There is no way this gets voted in. People know that legislation like this opens pandora's box on what other types of guns could be banned. It's not outside the realm of possibilities that 20 years from now assault weapon bans from this legislation will be broaden to semi auto hand guns, then to hand guns, then to rifles and shot guns. Pretty soon, Oregonians will have to defend themselves like Swaye's people did, with the classic bow and arrow.
Farmers and the rest of rural Oregon will have 98% voter turnout over this bill. Hipsters/losers in Portland and Eugene won't have a high enough turnout to overcome that.
However this will end up being the Dem's worst nightmare if it gets on the ballot. In Oregon, Conservatives sit on the sidelines as they have known that it doesn't matter how they vote as whatever Portland libtard wants will be voted in for the last 30 plus years.
However THIS will energize them like no other time in History and the Dems in other areas of the State outside of Portland will have this to reckon with and it may just cook their Gooses.
You think Medford, K Falls, and Roseburg are going to impact or carry the state? All shit holes as Donnie would say. I know, I've lived in two other them for long periods of time.
The group think in those tiny places are 100% the opposite of what actually happens at the polls.
Of the cities you list, only Eugene and maybe Ashland are liberal. The liberals in Bend are a handful of hippies and Cali transplants that many of which head back south come election time anyway. The born and raised in Bend are more conservative than liberal.
-
I see you didn't bother to read the actual initiative itself.... SHOCKER!!!!2001400ex said:
You don't read well. And you don't understand legislative process. People said the exact same about the I 594 in Washington and did they take any guns with that legislation?salemcoog said:
The initiative calls everything an assault weapon. It's written so badly I'm not sure why I'm wasting my energy on it. However it's Oregon so any poorly written legislation that lets FMB's and Hondo's of the world feel good, has a good chance to pass.GrundleStiltzkin said:“We recognize that there are perfectly legitimate uses of guns for self-protection and hunting that make a lot of sense,” said Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana of Congregation Beth Israel and one of petitioners.
“But assault weapons are not used for either of those purposes. Many of these weapons exist only for killing and do not belong in civilian hands.”
If you don't like guns, fine, but don't make shit up. Something like 10 million AR-15s alone exist in private hands.
And speaking of making shit up.AR-15 rifles and their cousins are special because although they are semi-automatic weapons and therefore only fire one bullet each time the trigger is pulled, they are known for being accurate and easy to modify with accessories such as extended magazines, to shoot hundreds of bullets without reloading, and bump stocks, to allow faster shooting.
It's sheep like you, OBK, and sledog that get triggered anytime anyone says anything about gun control, that will actually cause guns to be confiscated.
While I believe it could get to ballot in November and get voted through. It's so poorly written that even a sodbuster can see it would be struck down in court before enacted. -
I like how hondo always tries to blame the reader for the incoherent shit he writes and then acts like what he said was some big mystery that is above our limited intellects2001400ex said:
You don't read well. And you don't understand legislative process. People said the exact same about the I 594 in Washington and did they take any guns with that legislation?salemcoog said:
The initiative calls everything an assault weapon. It's written so badly I'm not sure why I'm wasting my energy on it. However it's Oregon so any poorly written legislation that lets FMB's and Hondo's of the world feel good, has a good chance to pass.GrundleStiltzkin said:“We recognize that there are perfectly legitimate uses of guns for self-protection and hunting that make a lot of sense,” said Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana of Congregation Beth Israel and one of petitioners.
“But assault weapons are not used for either of those purposes. Many of these weapons exist only for killing and do not belong in civilian hands.”
If you don't like guns, fine, but don't make shit up. Something like 10 million AR-15s alone exist in private hands.
And speaking of making shit up.AR-15 rifles and their cousins are special because although they are semi-automatic weapons and therefore only fire one bullet each time the trigger is pulled, they are known for being accurate and easy to modify with accessories such as extended magazines, to shoot hundreds of bullets without reloading, and bump stocks, to allow faster shooting.
It's sheep like you, OBK, and sledog that get triggered anytime anyone says anything about gun control, that will actually cause guns to be confiscated.
Its one thing when say a Berkeley grad tries that. Its another when the board idiot does it -
I'd say both efforts went full on resounding THUD.RaceBannon said:
I like how hondo always tries to blame the reader for the incoherent shit he writes and then acts like what he said was some big mystery that is above our limited intellects2001400ex said:
You don't read well. And you don't understand legislative process. People said the exact same about the I 594 in Washington and did they take any guns with that legislation?salemcoog said:
The initiative calls everything an assault weapon. It's written so badly I'm not sure why I'm wasting my energy on it. However it's Oregon so any poorly written legislation that lets FMB's and Hondo's of the world feel good, has a good chance to pass.GrundleStiltzkin said:“We recognize that there are perfectly legitimate uses of guns for self-protection and hunting that make a lot of sense,” said Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana of Congregation Beth Israel and one of petitioners.
“But assault weapons are not used for either of those purposes. Many of these weapons exist only for killing and do not belong in civilian hands.”
If you don't like guns, fine, but don't make shit up. Something like 10 million AR-15s alone exist in private hands.
And speaking of making shit up.AR-15 rifles and their cousins are special because although they are semi-automatic weapons and therefore only fire one bullet each time the trigger is pulled, they are known for being accurate and easy to modify with accessories such as extended magazines, to shoot hundreds of bullets without reloading, and bump stocks, to allow faster shooting.
It's sheep like you, OBK, and sledog that get triggered anytime anyone says anything about gun control, that will actually cause guns to be confiscated.
Its one thing when say a Berkeley grad tries that. Its another when the board idiot does it -
Why don't you address the point of my comment?RaceBannon said:
I like how hondo always tries to blame the reader for the incoherent shit he writes and then acts like what he said was some big mystery that is above our limited intellects2001400ex said:
You don't read well. And you don't understand legislative process. People said the exact same about the I 594 in Washington and did they take any guns with that legislation?salemcoog said:
The initiative calls everything an assault weapon. It's written so badly I'm not sure why I'm wasting my energy on it. However it's Oregon so any poorly written legislation that lets FMB's and Hondo's of the world feel good, has a good chance to pass.GrundleStiltzkin said:“We recognize that there are perfectly legitimate uses of guns for self-protection and hunting that make a lot of sense,” said Rabbi Michael Z. Cahana of Congregation Beth Israel and one of petitioners.
“But assault weapons are not used for either of those purposes. Many of these weapons exist only for killing and do not belong in civilian hands.”
If you don't like guns, fine, but don't make shit up. Something like 10 million AR-15s alone exist in private hands.
And speaking of making shit up.AR-15 rifles and their cousins are special because although they are semi-automatic weapons and therefore only fire one bullet each time the trigger is pulled, they are known for being accurate and easy to modify with accessories such as extended magazines, to shoot hundreds of bullets without reloading, and bump stocks, to allow faster shooting.
It's sheep like you, OBK, and sledog that get triggered anytime anyone says anything about gun control, that will actually cause guns to be confiscated.
Its one thing when say a Berkeley grad tries that. Its another when the board idiot does it -
Because it is incoherent shit?
Thought I made that clear -
What you made clear is you don't understand the basic concept. Every day.RaceBannon said:Because it is incoherent shit?
Thought I made that clear -
I like how hondo always tries to blame the reader for the incoherent shit he writes and then acts like what he said was some big mystery that is above our limited intellects2001400ex said:
What you made clear is you don't understand the basic concept. Every day.RaceBannon said:Because it is incoherent shit?
Thought I made that clear
Its one thing when say a Berkeley grad tries that. Its another when the board idiot does it -
HoustonFredo won't answer my simple question because to do so would be an admission that he's been full of shit the whole time. That's not a lack of understanding; it's willful ignorance.RaceBannon said:
I like how hondo always tries to blame the reader for the incoherent shit he writes and then acts like what he said was some big mystery that is above our limited intellects2001400ex said:
What you made clear is you don't understand the basic concept. Every day.RaceBannon said:Because it is incoherent shit?
Thought I made that clear
Its one thing when say a Berkeley grad tries that. Its another when the board idiot does it -
Keep repeating what you are saying.RaceBannon said:
I like how hondo always tries to blame the reader for the incoherent shit he writes and then acts like what he said was some big mystery that is above our limited intellects2001400ex said:
What you made clear is you don't understand the basic concept. Every day.RaceBannon said:Because it is incoherent shit?
Thought I made that clear
Its one thing when say a Berkeley grad tries that. Its another when the board idiot does it -
Donnie land slid every redneck county and lost the state by 10%.salemcoog said:Mosster47 said:
WTF are you babbling about? Portland, Salem, Eugene, Bend, and Ashland are extremely liberal. That's the state.salemcoog said:
This could be further from the truth. Portland proper controls everything and Portland is about 70% liberal and hate guns of all sorts. It also has 5 X the population of everywhere else combined. If they get the 88,000 sigs, this will pass.greenblood said:It still has a ways to go. It still has to get the signatures to get put on the ballot, then Oregonians have to actually vote it in. I don't think they are going to get the votes needed.
They absolutely say could be surrendered. There is no way this gets voted in. People know that legislation like this opens pandora's box on what other types of guns could be banned. It's not outside the realm of possibilities that 20 years from now assault weapon bans from this legislation will be broaden to semi auto hand guns, then to hand guns, then to rifles and shot guns. Pretty soon, Oregonians will have to defend themselves like Swaye's people did, with the classic bow and arrow.
Farmers and the rest of rural Oregon will have 98% voter turnout over this bill. Hipsters/losers in Portland and Eugene won't have a high enough turnout to overcome that.
However this will end up being the Dem's worst nightmare if it gets on the ballot. In Oregon, Conservatives sit on the sidelines as they have known that it doesn't matter how they vote as whatever Portland libtard wants will be voted in for the last 30 plus years.
However THIS will energize them like no other time in History and the Dems in other areas of the State outside of Portland will have this to reckon with and it may just cook their Gooses.
You think Medford, K Falls, and Roseburg are going to impact or carry the state? All shit holes as Donnie would say. I know, I've lived in two other them for long periods of time.
The group think in those tiny places are 100% the opposite of what actually happens at the polls.
Of the cities you list, only Eugene and maybe Ashland are liberal. The liberals in Bend are a handful of hippies and Cali transplants that many of which head back south come election time anyway. The born and raised in Bend are more conservative than liberal.
People are out of their fucking minds if they think conservatives will swing anything in Oregon. -
The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
-
I believe in a Creator.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
If the Creator intended for people to be given the right to arm themselves, he probably would have mentioned it somewhere in one of his 66 books.
There is a strong pro 2nd amendment argument. It's in your third sentence. It has nothing to do with anything given many by the Creator though. -
Read the founding fathers statements.dnc said:
I believe in a Creator.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
If the Creator intended for people to be given the right to arm themselves, he probably would have mentioned it somewhere in one of his 66 books.
There is a strong pro 2nd amendment argument. It's in your third sentence. It has nothing to do with anything given many by the Creator though. -
Sounds like this creator guy had really specific ideas about the level of weaponry and reasons for people to have them. Sounds super duper convincing.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
#retardsdontgetphysics
#seewhatImeansnow -
You are effectively trying to explain quantum physics to a retard. Stop.dnc said:
I believe in a Creator.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
If the Creator intended for people to be given the right to arm themselves, he probably would have mentioned it somewhere in one of his 66 books.
There is a strong pro 2nd amendment argument. It's in your third sentence. It has nothing to do with anything given many by the Creator though. -
#thisdamnphone!Sledog said:
Read the founding father's statements.dnc said:
I believe in a Creator.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
If the Creator intended for people to be given the right to arm themselves, he probably would have mentioned it somewhere in one of his 66 books.
There is a strong pro 2nd amendment argument. It's in your third sentence. It has nothing to do with anything given many by the Creator though.
#engrishiscool -
Yes if Jesus were here, he'd tell us that to ensure a peaceful society, everyone needs to be armed with assualt rifles.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
-
Since you are an expert on our creator and the Constitution, it should be easy for you to post quotes.Sledog said:
Read the founding fathers statements.dnc said:
I believe in a Creator.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
If the Creator intended for people to be given the right to arm themselves, he probably would have mentioned it somewhere in one of his 66 books.
There is a strong pro 2nd amendment argument. It's in your third sentence. It has nothing to do with anything given many by the Creator though. -
Odd they didn't outlaw repeating firearms when they were invented way back in the 1700's did they? The came Colt's revolver and the repeating rifle which were the "assault weapons" of their day. We jumped from a muzzle loading single shot only capable 2-3 shots per minute by the highly trained to 30+ shots a minute without much training. Damn you could wipe out a whole town!creepycoug said:
Sounds like this creator guy had really specific ideas about the level of weaponry and reasons for people to have them. Sounds super duper convincing.Sledog said:The 2nd amendment is not revocable. It was pre-existing given by the creator (for you atheists just random chance). It was meant for the people to be similarly armed to the military at least as far as personal weapons are concerned. Of course you used to be able to own your own cannon. As I've said before who's going to go get them? Which of you commie commandos is headed out to kick some doors? Civil war is messy.
#retardsdontgetphysics
#seewhatImeansnow
#retrdasdontgetfirearms -
Anyone going to answer my original question?
#liberalsarecowards -
No one is coming for your guns dumbfuck. Well maybe under Trump's "confiscate first, due process later" policy they might take yours.Sledog said:Anyone going to answer my original question?
#liberalsarecowards
