‘Sensitive Content’: Twitter Hides President Trump, Don Jr. Posts for Sharing Drudge Headlines
Comments
-
Whynotboth.gifpawz said:2001400ex said:
That's a tequila long post basically saying I'm the only one here smart enough to monetize my time.pawz said:DerekJohnson said:
If Moveon.org wanted to be a sponsor here for $100 a month I'd take itPitchfork51 said:
And you shouldnt. Because it's fucking idiotic.DerekJohnson said:
hadn't thought of it that waypawz said:
How does that compare to what the Taki Tiki paid for advertising?DerekJohnson said:
Actually, he did donate $25 a couple years ago.haie said:Derek ban this stupid fucking faggot. There are plenty of liberals here that are reasonable to converse with and aren’t spamming the boreds. He hasn’t donated a dime. IP nuke this piece of shit loser.
Spam is a form of advertising.
George Soros'/Clinton Machine's pockets are BOTTOMLESS.
HTH
Exactly.
We've established he's not one of "us". The poasts on other boreds on HCH are even more painfully awkward that the shit trotted out in the Tug
Wikileaks proved the Clinton/Soros/Ruski machine actively infiltrated internet message boreds to spread their message.
Going back to Unleased, he is now the 3rd political-troll this community has encountered. The long-timers will remember @bushmolestor and @smole. The difference with this shit-head and the other two is he stayed after the election.
His posting routine is predictable and right on tim, every tim. So predictable, I'm confident I could outline the manual that dictates his posting repertoire.
Pay DJ a fair advertising dollar or GTFO.
Either you can afford to pay the advertising dollar, or you're being subsidized by food stamps. -
2001400ex said:
Whynotboth.gifpawz said:2001400ex said:
That's a tequila long post basically saying I'm the only one here smart enough to monetize my time.pawz said:DerekJohnson said:
If Moveon.org wanted to be a sponsor here for $100 a month I'd take itPitchfork51 said:
And you shouldnt. Because it's fucking idiotic.DerekJohnson said:
hadn't thought of it that waypawz said:
How does that compare to what the Taki Tiki paid for advertising?DerekJohnson said:
Actually, he did donate $25 a couple years ago.haie said:Derek ban this stupid fucking faggot. There are plenty of liberals here that are reasonable to converse with and aren’t spamming the boreds. He hasn’t donated a dime. IP nuke this piece of shit loser.
Spam is a form of advertising.
George Soros'/Clinton Machine's pockets are BOTTOMLESS.
HTH
Exactly.
We've established he's not one of "us". The poasts on other boreds on HCH are even more painfully awkward that the shit trotted out in the Tug
Wikileaks proved the Clinton/Soros/Ruski machine actively infiltrated internet message boreds to spread their message.
Going back to Unleased, he is now the 3rd political-troll this community has encountered. The long-timers will remember @bushmolestor and @smole. The difference with this shit-head and the other two is he stayed after the election.
His posting routine is predictable and right on tim, every tim. So predictable, I'm confident I could outline the manual that dictates his posting repertoire.
Pay DJ a fair advertising dollar or GTFO.
Either you can afford to pay the advertising dollar, or you're being subsidized by food stamps.
Pay Up or GTFO.
Preferably both.
-
I don't want to see Hondo banned, as he very occasionally has something witty to say. But, I must admit, I do want to see him pay. It's criminal to be here as much as he is slaying bandwidth and not even chip in 50 bucks a year.
-
Wow the Oscars award winners called to say that Every thread on the Tug today is a fucking steampile.
-
Brought to you by Hondo Shitposting.salemcoog said:Wow the Oscars award winners called to say that Every thread on the Tug today is a fucking steampile.
-
Weren't you just jerking off at the end of net neutrality? Now your ISP can legally decide what sites reach your screen.pawz said:
Twitter, FB, youtube, google have reached too big to fail in the social media space, insofar as they hold a clear monopoly over the intellectual traffic moving through social media and the interwebs.2001400ex said:
I missed the part where the government imposed this "restriction". Not to mention this nugget from your own link. They didn't remove or delete the content....DerekJohnson said:
If you believe in free speech, this story should bother you.2001400ex said:It's a conspiracy!!! Them liberals are out to get us.
Users who wish to ensure that they continue to see all tweets from the President, Donald Trump Jr. and @DRUDGE_REPORT will have to manually disable their content filter. This can be done by unchecking the box marked “hide sensitive content” in your safety settings.
But scream about censorship and fake news.
I'm not for more Govt restriction, so down't twist, but if you can't see the need for political impartiality among these social media goliaths, then you need to sit on a rusty conical cheese grater.
Better hope Soros Bucks aren't reaching Comcast's wallets. -
No. Quite the contrary.UWhuskytskeet said:pawz said:
Twitter, FB, youtube, google have reached too big to fail in the social media space, insofar as they hold a clear monopoly over the intellectual traffic moving through social media and the interwebs.2001400ex said:
I missed the part where the government imposed this "restriction". Not to mention this nugget from your own link. They didn't remove or delete the content....DerekJohnson said:
If you believe in free speech, this story should bother you.2001400ex said:It's a conspiracy!!! Them liberals are out to get us.
Users who wish to ensure that they continue to see all tweets from the President, Donald Trump Jr. and @DRUDGE_REPORT will have to manually disable their content filter. This can be done by unchecking the box marked “hide sensitive content” in your safety settings.
But scream about censorship and fake news.
I'm not for more Govt restriction, so down't twist, but if you can't see the need for political impartiality among these social media goliaths, then you need to sit on a rusty conical cheese grater.
Weren't you just jerking off at the end of net neutrality? Now your ISP can legally decide what sites reach your screen.
Better hope Soros Bucks aren't reaching Comcast's wallets. -
Technically Gifted2001400ex said:
Cool story bro.DerekJohnson said:2001400ex said:
I missed the part where the government imposed this "restriction". Not to mention this nugget from your own link. They didn't remove or delete the content....DerekJohnson said:
If you believe in free speech, this story should bother you.2001400ex said:It's a conspiracy!!! Them liberals are out to get us.
Users who wish to ensure that they continue to see all tweets from the President, Donald Trump Jr. and @DRUDGE_REPORT will have to manually disable their content filter. This can be done by unchecking the box marked “hide sensitive content” in your safety settings.
But scream about censorship and fake news.
Wednesday 2PM.
Derek: Oh wow, no clouds today. The sun is out.
HondoFS: No it's not.
Derek: What? Just look up at the sky. Pure blue, not a cloud in sight.
HondoFS: You'd like me to do that, wouldn't you?
Derek: Huh?
HondoFS: Just more of your fake news. Don't you dare try to shove your pro-Trump agenda down MY throat! -
Maybe Derek needs to improve the content by posting more about Twitter and free speech.salemcoog said:Wow the Oscars award winners called to say that Every thread on the Tug today is a fucking steampile.
-
Hadn't thought of it that waypawz said:
Then DJ (ILTCHDJ, IWILTD) should be on a beach in Thailand drinking mai tais having his balls licked byWilburHooksHands said:
What if he IS Soros??pawz said:
How does that compare to what the Taki Tiki paid for advertising?DerekJohnson said:
Actually, he did donate $25 a couple years ago.haie said:Derek ban this stupid fucking faggot. There are plenty of liberals here that are reasonable to converse with and aren’t spamming the boreds. He hasn’t donated a dime. IP nuke this piece of shit loser.
Spam is a form of advertising.
George Soros'/Clinton Machine's pockets are BOTTOMLESS.
HTHladyboishookers. -
I think you've changed my mind on this issue.GrundleStiltzkin said:Criticize these companies for their contradictory policies and enforcement, but bringing freedom of speech/FA issues into it is a bad look. There are progressives who've advocated for public funding for newspapers like NYT. It's bad there and it's bad here. It's a couple click away from nationalizing media.