Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Team Success vs. Recruiting (w/ Coaching Value added)
AIRWOLF
Member Posts: 1,840
Comments
-
What is the second category? Can't see full title on mobile. Why does it not fluctuate very far from 0% whatever it is.
I like that 2008 was off the charts but intuitively believe the z score for that season should be six. -
It isn’t set up for mobile.FremontTroll said:What is the second category? Can't see full title on mobile. Why does it not fluctuate very far from 0% whatever it is.
I like that 2008 was off the charts but intuitively believe the z score for that season should be six.
The line graph that looks really flat for UW is the 4 year moving average of class rating. -
Oh, that makes sense. Maybe you could rescale it to like +/- 5% to better show changes.AIRWOLF said:
It isn’t set up for mobile.FremontTroll said:What is the second category? Can't see full title on mobile. Why does it not fluctuate very far from 0% whatever it is.
I like that 2008 was off the charts but intuitively believe the z score for that season should be six.
The line graph that looks really flat for UW is the 4 year moving average of class rating. -
I fixed it so the scaling is the same no matter what team you look at. The Huskies’ average talent has been pretty stable relative to a lot of teams. But the ramp is really going to start in 2018.FremontTroll said:
Oh, that makes sense. Maybe you could rescale it to like +/- 5% to better show changes.AIRWOLF said:
It isn’t set up for mobile.FremontTroll said:What is the second category? Can't see full title on mobile. Why does it not fluctuate very far from 0% whatever it is.
I like that 2008 was off the charts but intuitively believe the z score for that season should be six.
The line graph that looks really flat for UW is the 4 year moving average of class rating.
