Each recruit is weighted in the rankings according to a Gaussian distribution formula (a bell curve), where a team's best recruit is worth the most points. You can think of a team's point score as being the sum of ratings of all the team's commits where the best recruit is worth 100% of his rating value, the second best recruit is worth nearly 100% of his rating value, down to the last recruit who is worth a small fraction of his rating value. This formula ensures that all commits contribute at least some value to the team's score without heavily rewarding teams that have several more commitments than others.
So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit? Fuck off, Heat was the shit
So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit? Fuck off, Heat was the shit Val Kilmer’s best work.
So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit? Yes, statistics are actually a liberal conspiracy. Great point.
So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit? Yes, statistics are actually a liberal conspiracy. Great point. Statistics are not the same as opinions or fraudulent data.Hth
Not sure how you think a pending lawsuit for libel filed by Mann proves Mann is a fraud? Even if he doesn't win the libel case that doesn't mean his research was fraudulent, do you see why?Every climate reconstruction study since '98 has essentially confirmed Mann's study but that is neither here nor there.Are we really re-litigating ClimateGate in 2018? I thought you guys had moved on to attacking other institutional pillars of society from the NYT to the FBI.
Not sure how you think a pending lawsuit for libel filed by Mann proves Mann is a fraud? Even if he doesn't win the libel case that doesn't mean his research was fraudulent, do you see why?Every climate reconstruction study since '98 has essentially confirmed Mann's study but that is neither here nor there.Are we really re-litigating ClimateGate in 2018? I thought you guys had moved on to attacking other institutional pillars of society from the NYT to the FBI. If you annoy everything, nothing remains.
No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.