Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to recruiting nerds

2

Comments

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited February 2018
    Not at all.

    Non-coaches put their opinions into a model. Great. Doesn’t explain how leaving 8 positions empty makes for the best recruiting class.

    Mann, well, snicker

    https://principia-scientific.org/breaking-key-un-climate-fraudster-makes-concessions-tim-ball-lawsuit/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Neighbor2972
    Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,336
    11 Players are on the field at once. Quality > Quantity, luckily we have both this year
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited February 2018
    Yeah, “quality” as defined by non-coaches trying to sell subscriptions to fans like us. Kinda the point.


    Edit, they’re now #3 Makes more sense
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    FremontTroll said:

    Not sure how you think a pending lawsuit for libel filed by Mann proves Mann is a fraud? Even if he doesn't win the libel case that doesn't mean his research was fraudulent, do you see why?

    Every climate reconstruction study since '98 has essentially confirmed Mann's study but that is neither here nor there.

    Are we really re-litigating ClimateGate in 2018? I thought you guys had moved on to attacking other institutional pillars of society from the NYT to the FBI.

    If you attack everything, nothing remains.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    FremontTroll said:

    Not sure how you think a pending lawsuit for libel filed by Mann proves Mann is a fraud? Even if he doesn't win the libel case that doesn't mean his research was fraudulent, do you see why?

    Every climate reconstruction study since '98 has essentially confirmed Mann's study but that is neither here nor there.

    Are we really re-litigating ClimateGate in 2018? I thought you guys had moved on to attacking other institutional pillars of society from the NYT to the FBI.

    If you annoy everything, nothing remains.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    doogie said:

    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.

    SarkFan69 gave you an excellent explanation. Facts matter. Facts are real. Facts that go against our intuitions and preconceived beliefs matter even more.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Neighbor2972
    Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,336
    doogie said:

    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.

    There is no way not to have opinions in recruiting rankings. I don't understand what you want them to do? Opinions + Scientific Model > Opinions. If you think their opinions are wrong then fine, but why do you care about recruiting rankings at all?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    doogie said:

    No. We were discussing 247 non -coaches selling subscriptions using opinions with flawed data, they try to fit into a scientific model.

    Is this shtick? If so, it is high quality satire.

    If not, then perhaps you should take a long walk for some perspective. Or drink bleach. Your option.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter