PM to recruiting nerds
Comments
-
Each recruit is weighted in the rankings according to a Gaussian distribution formula (a bell curve), where a team's best recruit is worth the most points. You can think of a team's point score as being the sum of ratings of all the team's commits where the best recruit is worth 100% of his rating value, the second best recruit is worth nearly 100% of his rating value, down to the last recruit who is worth a small fraction of his rating value. This formula ensures that all commits contribute at least some value to the team's score without heavily rewarding teams that have several more commitments than others.
-
Or you could say it's the Sark rule. Where you take 26 players every year and less than 10 Actually ever stay past the first 2 years. So you perpetually have big classes full of shit players.SarkFanSixtyNine said:Each recruit is weighted in the rankings according to a Gaussian distribution formula (a bell curve), where a team's best recruit is worth the most points. You can think of a team's point score as being the sum of ratings of all the team's commits where the best recruit is worth 100% of his rating value, the second best recruit is worth nearly 100% of his rating value, down to the last recruit who is worth a small fraction of his rating value. This formula ensures that all commits contribute at least some value to the team's score without heavily rewarding teams that have several more commitments than others.
-
So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
-
Fuck off, Heat was the shitdoogie said:So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
-
Heat >>> Push?
-
Val Kilmer’s best work.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Fuck off, Heat was the shitdoogie said:So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
-
Yes, statistics are actually a liberal conspiracy. Great point.doogie said:So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
-
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Val Kilmer’s best work.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Fuck off, Heat was the shitdoogie said:So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
-
Statistics are not the same as opinions or fraudulent data.FremontTroll said:
Yes, statistics are actually a liberal conspiracy. Great point.doogie said:So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
Hth -
So because you didn't understand the explanation of the Gaussian distribution your mind defaulted to another subject you don't understand as an analogy. Nice.doogie said:
Statistics are not the same as opinions or fraudulent data.FremontTroll said:
Yes, statistics are actually a liberal conspiracy. Great point.doogie said:So, it’s like Michael Mann’s hockey stick bullshit?
Hth
Where is the opinion in the class rankings formula? Where is the fraudulent data?
Where is the opinion in the assertion that global temperatures were the highest in 1,000 plus years in the 20th century and have continued to rise? Where is the fraudulent data?
