Today's Results
Comments
-
Find any Republican willing to cut spending yet?Sledog said:
Cuts are implied. Smaller gov needs less money. HTHTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Cutting taxes without cutting spending is dumb and bad.Sledog said:
"Time to slash this out of control government growth and overreach then the government won't need as much in taxes and they can be cut some more!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Please to show us the spending cuts.Sledog said:
Money is being repatriated that NEVER would have come back. Lots of the money from cuts is going into expansion and hiring employees to fill the new jobs.2001400ex said:
This is the point everyone misses. The tax cut is sold to grow the economy. If you give $1,000 to 10 middle class people. Every dollar off they goes back into the economy. If you give that same $10,000 to Bill Gates, he won't even notice it.Pitchfork51 said:
What argument are you makingGwad said:
The tax code from over a half century ago was designed to put you into a higher tax bracket the wealthier you became. Why is this not fair, as your needs are being met.Pitchfork51 said:Of course the majority in any tax cut goes to corporations and the wealthy.
They pay the most taxes.
I'm saying that a 1 percent tax cut for the wealthy is bigger than a 10 percent for the common folk
So when people throw out "most goes to the wealthy and corporations" well duh
While some corporations are giving bonuses and pay raises. Which is great. That's fractions of their cut. The majority is going to the stockholders through dividends and growth. And the vast majority of stock is not owned by the middle class.
If the government has too much money, then I fully agree it should go to the wealthy.
I know this goes against your "the government will take care of me" mantra but get the hell over it comrade! -
Easier than finding a liberal willing to.2001400ex said:
Find any Republican willing to cut spending yet?Sledog said:
Cuts are implied. Smaller gov needs less money. HTHTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Cutting taxes without cutting spending is dumb and bad.Sledog said:
"Time to slash this out of control government growth and overreach then the government won't need as much in taxes and they can be cut some more!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Please to show us the spending cuts.Sledog said:
Money is being repatriated that NEVER would have come back. Lots of the money from cuts is going into expansion and hiring employees to fill the new jobs.2001400ex said:
This is the point everyone misses. The tax cut is sold to grow the economy. If you give $1,000 to 10 middle class people. Every dollar off they goes back into the economy. If you give that same $10,000 to Bill Gates, he won't even notice it.Pitchfork51 said:
What argument are you makingGwad said:
The tax code from over a half century ago was designed to put you into a higher tax bracket the wealthier you became. Why is this not fair, as your needs are being met.Pitchfork51 said:Of course the majority in any tax cut goes to corporations and the wealthy.
They pay the most taxes.
I'm saying that a 1 percent tax cut for the wealthy is bigger than a 10 percent for the common folk
So when people throw out "most goes to the wealthy and corporations" well duh
While some corporations are giving bonuses and pay raises. Which is great. That's fractions of their cut. The majority is going to the stockholders through dividends and growth. And the vast majority of stock is not owned by the middle class.
If the government has too much money, then I fully agree it should go to the wealthy.
I know this goes against your "the government will take care of me" mantra but get the hell over it comrade! -
Its not working this way though. The percentage points are lower for the poorest and higher for the wealthiest. This is from what I have read anyways.Pitchfork51 said:
What argument are you makingGwad said:
The tax code from over a half century ago was designed to put you into a higher tax bracket the wealthier you became. Why is this not fair, as your needs are being met.Pitchfork51 said:Of course the majority in any tax cut goes to corporations and the wealthy.
They pay the most taxes.
I'm saying that a 1 percent tax cut for the wealthy is bigger than a 10 percent for the common folk
So when people throw out "most goes to the wealthy and corporations" well duh -
Just print more money. No problem!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Capitalism is awesome.Dude61 said:Progressives are backed into corner after 8 years promoting economic and personal virtues of being on food stamps and welfare now trying to diss work and $1000 bonuses and still portray capitalism as heartless
Running up the deficit is irresponsible. -
Maybe you should stop reading and just listen to usGwad said:
Its not working this way though. The percentage points are lower for the poorest and higher for the wealthiest. This is from what I have read anyways.Pitchfork51 said:
What argument are you makingGwad said:
The tax code from over a half century ago was designed to put you into a higher tax bracket the wealthier you became. Why is this not fair, as your needs are being met.Pitchfork51 said:Of course the majority in any tax cut goes to corporations and the wealthy.
They pay the most taxes.
I'm saying that a 1 percent tax cut for the wealthy is bigger than a 10 percent for the common folk
So when people throw out "most goes to the wealthy and corporations" well duh -
Yea but Trumps fat
-
Swaye said:
In this thread: Hondo says dumb shit.
Water is wet POTYTierbsHsotBoobs said:Swaye said:In every thread: Hondo says dumb shit.
-
Exxon Mobil to invest $50 billion in US over 5 years, citing tax reform
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/29/exxon-mobil-to-invest-50-billion-in-us-over-5-years-citing-tax-reform.html
More results. -
-
Yea but his Twitter








