Kicker Spooge
I know there is an easy if you do X, Y happens type of conversation. However if we keep it black and white, if UW has a good kicker they very easily could have won the ASU game and changes the landscape to a top 4. UW isn't unique in this which is why i find it hilarious that kickers are like the retarded kid in the corner. They can be walk on's, shitty soccer players, whatever. But why aren't they more heralded in the recruiting sphere for value considering they are on the team for 4 years? It's almost as if you give a kicker a scholy he's got the job for 4 years regardless of if he's good. There is zero comp. @Dennis_DeYoung . I know kickers are your heritage* so please do not be bashful.
Even treating the kicker like a QB seems logical. 1 per season, maybe 1 every 2 years and create some sort of competition in the slot.
*Racust fucks I was talking about lack of legs for a kicker, not kickers being white
Comments
-
I think the problem is that kicking is extremely mental, and its not easy to tell which kids have the balls to be a college kicker. So you use a scholly on a high rated kicker, and then he sucks, so you give up and put in the walk on. Is that going to make you want to chance another scholarship on another kicker who may or may not end up being good? I just think its really hard to evaluate kickers based on them kicking a few high school field goals, and a few highlights of them drilling kicks from 60 in practice. I think a lot of coaches would rather just take a bunch of good walk on kickers and make one earn a scholarship.
-
Oklahoma had six kickers on scholarship one year and they still all sucked.
Just seems like there isn't enough differentiation in talent level to know who is worth a scholarship. -
UW had a kicker who struggled to make extra points in 90 and 91
-
I may be misremembering this, but didn't we lose 3 or 4 games one year because of John Wales? I remember him missing kicks against UCLA and Oregon that year. I think he also midhandled a punt against ND which cost us the game. Again, I could be mistaken. I just remember hating him.
-
Pretty muchbananasnblondes said:I may be misremembering this, but didn't we lose 3 or 4 games one year because of John Wales? I remember him missing kicks against UCLA and Oregon that year. I think he also midhandled a punt against ND which cost us the game. Again, I could be mistaken. I just remember hating him.
95 against Oregon and ND -
Seems like UW has had a bipolar experience with kickers. (See what I did there?)
Either they real good or they real bad. -
He missed 2 FGs against USC which ended 21-21. He missed a couple against Oregon and we lost 24-22.bananasnblondes said:I may be misremembering this, but didn't we lose 3 or 4 games one year because of John Wales? I remember him missing kicks against UCLA and Oregon that year. I think he also midhandled a punt against ND which cost us the game. Again, I could be mistaken. I just remember hating him.
If he made one of them, we would've gone to the Rose Bowl. -
Against Oregon he gagged one then the Huskies caused a fumble and got the ball back and Lambo played for the field goal again and he gagged it again
After 94 that was the final piece of evidence that Lambo was over his head as a coach -
You had to be a MAJOR Doog if you didn't want Lambright fired when Kenny Wheaton crossed midfield.RaceBannon said:Against Oregon he gagged one then the Huskies caused a fumble and got the ball back and Lambo played for the field goal again and he gagged it again
After 94 that was the final piece of evidence that Lambo was over his head as a coach -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You had to be a MAJOR Doog if you didn't want Lambright fired when Kenny Wheaton crossed the Oregon ten.RaceBannon said:Against Oregon he gagged one then the Huskies caused a fumble and got the ball back and Lambo played for the field goal again and he gagged it again
After 94 that was the final piece of evidence that Lambo was over his head as a coach
