Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Nearly 50% of Millennials Reject Capitalism

1456810

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,096 Founders Club
    The tax is on regular housing to pay for affordable housing by the way. Making regular housing less affordable

    A plan by our next governor
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,971 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    Weed has already been monopolized by everyone knowing how to grow it. The government fucked up that cash grab.

    Renewable energy is a joke. My holdings in WNDW hit two weeks ago. Thanks for the 212%, but it's a joke. Our president is balls deep in cole.

    Hoverboards that catch on fire after three hours?

    The internet is already monopolized and the FCC just locked them in.

    Millennials will be the generation that brings it all down by waiting for Baby Boomers to die and swooping their retirement dream homes for pennies on the dollar, shopping at thrift stores and outlets, and buying used cars and driving them until they die. The generation after them are even cheaper.
    Just fucking kill yourself loser
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I didn't say he did. Incentives to put people in little boxes to ride the bus to their little job aren't needed. Builders build what people want. They make money without your fucking stupid incentives to build what people don't want.

    I didn't think I needed to spell it out. I was wrong
    You are so cute when moving the goalposts back tracking your FS comment.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,096 Founders Club

    What “LA” are you referring to? The state CEQA law is a notorious tool for NIMBYs, and municipalities add layers to the bureaucracy builders go through (density, parking, transit, prevailing wage, and other environmental). The one scared cow has always been affordable housing however, especially within LA County and the 88 incorporated cities.

    There’s a tax on affordable housing development?
    LA is proposing it. I linked it here awhile back. The thread was not @MikeSeaver pop
    2001400ex said:

    You are so cute when moving the goalposts back tracking your FS comment.
    Not my problem if you can't read.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,994 Standard Supporter

    I lived under communism in the 70's. Nothing special.
    I didn't know Houston was Communist.
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,971 Founders Club
    edited January 2018

    It's not a dog whistle

    Local Cali government makes housing more expensive. That's what they're good at.

    LA wants to tax home builders for affordable housing. Making housing more expensive to make it affordable

    That's only part of the issue in the Bay Area. Like Seattle there's only so much room. Location will cost you
    Anywhere you need to sidestep shit on the sidewalk or needles in the park is fucked. Fuck Cisco

    I forgot puke but that's ok because it means somebody was partying their balls off. Ok SF good for some things but fuck the traffic.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    The tax is on regular housing to pay for affordable housing by the way. Making regular housing less affordable

    A plan by our next governor

    You should assassinate him.
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,040
    edited January 2018

    I didn't say he did. Incentives to put people in little boxes to ride the bus to their little job aren't needed. Builders build what people want. They make money without your fucking stupid incentives to build what people don't want.

    I didn't think I needed to spell it out. I was wrong
    For builders, single-family homes are profitable. High-density stuff like townhomes and condos are also profitable, but less so. Builders prefer to build single family homes for this reason; they're in business to maximize profit.

    People want affordable housing. Builders want to maximize profit. This leads to a suboptimal aggregate outcome unless local govt. steps in to provide incentives for builders to build housing that people want, where people want it, for a price they can afford.

    That liberal rag The Economist spelled it out pretty clearly many years ago, specifically in reference to Bay Area housing policy. I paid special attention to it at the time because it dealt with how Bay Area local govt. incentives affected the housing market in the Central Valley, and why my parents' efforts to become Modesto property barons in the early 1990's didn't work out the way they hoped.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,675 Founders Club
    haie said:

    I picture you flipping burgers, phone in one hand while snickering like a fag as you post your next shitty link.
    POTD
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    BearsWiin said:

    For builders, single-family homes are profitable. High-density stuff like townhomes and condos are also profitable, but less so. Builders prefer to build single family homes for this reason; they're in business to maximize profit.

    People want affordable housing. Builders want to maximize profit. This leads to a suboptimal aggregate outcome unless local govt. steps in to provide incentives for builders to build housing that people want, where people want it, for a price they can afford.

    That liberal rag The Economist spelled it out pretty clearly many years ago, specifically in reference to Bay Area housing policy. I paid special attention to it at the time because it dealt with how Bay Area local govt. incentives affected the housing market in the Central Valley, and why my parents' efforts to become Modesto property barons in the early 1990's didn't work out the way they hoped.
    Sounds like you’ve read a lot of Academics writing about building theory.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,096 Founders Club
    BearsWiin said:

    For builders, single-family homes are profitable. High-density stuff like townhomes and condos are also profitable, but less so. Builders prefer to build single family homes for this reason; they're in business to maximize profit.

    People want affordable housing. Builders want to maximize profit. This leads to a suboptimal aggregate outcome unless local govt. steps in to provide incentives for builders to build housing that people want, where people want it, for a price they can afford.

    That liberal rag The Economist spelled it out pretty clearly many years ago, specifically in reference to Bay Area housing policy. I paid special attention to it at the time because it dealt with how Bay Area local govt. incentives affected the housing market in the Central Valley, and why my parents' efforts to become Modesto property barons in the early 1990's didn't work out the way they hoped.
    People want affordable single family housing. Crisp

    If they wanted boxes they wouldn't need to be subsidized. If you want affordable housing deregulate. Building codes are for the safety of the population. Beyond that is just fucking up the game
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Previously. You said it yourself. Things change.
    Sleddoog, Race, and their retard apprentice OBK don't understand people adapt when presented bullshit propaganda.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Sounds like you should kill yourself
    Or just take a six figure job in a place that is dirt cheap to live and has everything I want in life. I'm 34, debt free, have 10 times in the bank what the average Millennial does and I'll retire a millionaire at 57.

    America is easy if you aren't stuck to overpriced cesspools.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,823
    Mosster47 said:

    Or just take a six figure job in a place that is dirt cheap to live and has everything I want in life. I'm 34, debt free, have 10 times in the bank what the average Millennial does and I'll retire a millionaire at 57.

    America is easy if you aren't stuck to overpriced cesspools.
    You're making six figures as an assistant high school football coach?


  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    dnc said:

    You're making six figures as an assistant high school football coach?


    No. I do that for free. I just enjoy coaching football. The stipends are insulting. It amounts to like 35 cents an hour. Our head man makes about $80k and only has to do one hour a day of non-football related work.
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,040
    Mosster47 said:

    Or just take a six figure job in a place that is dirt cheap to live and has everything I want in life. I'm 34, debt free, have 10 times in the bank what the average Millennial does and I'll retire a millionaire at 57.

    America is easy if you aren't stuck to overpriced cesspools.
    Being a millionaire isn't what it used to be, FWIW
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    BearsWiin said:

    Being a millionaire isn't what it used to be, FWIW
    Agreed, it never was honestly. I live cheap as shit though. I could live on a million dollars for a thousand years.

    I'll have four different pensions as well, so there is that.
  • BearsWiinBearsWiin Member Posts: 5,040
    Mosster47 said:

    Agreed, it never was honestly. I live cheap as shit though. I could live on a million dollars for a thousand years.

    I'll have four different pensions as well, so there is that.
    don't have kids
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

    I didn't know Houston was Communist.
    The "Cosmos" changed their name to the "Astros" in 1972. The more you know.
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,455 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited January 2018
    Plenty of affordable places for millennials to buy homes in Fuckstick, New Mexico.

    Bye.
Sign In or Register to comment.