Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
If they are going to do Wilcox
IrishDawg22
Member Posts: 2,754
Wilcox = HC (actually focused on the D)
Tosh/Sirmon = Co-DC + Dline & LBs
Dave Schramm = OC double his pay & he calls the plays
Heyward - DBs
If Sark doesn't take Hansen & Cozz, can them both. You could keep Kiesau @ WR but no more OC.
I guess that would be the best of a bad situation.
Tosh/Sirmon = Co-DC + Dline & LBs
Dave Schramm = OC double his pay & he calls the plays
Heyward - DBs
If Sark doesn't take Hansen & Cozz, can them both. You could keep Kiesau @ WR but no more OC.
I guess that would be the best of a bad situation.
Comments
-
...we are still screwed. Just not as severely as under Sark.
-
I like to retain the coaches of a program that was going nowhere and expect then to suddenly become great. That's what I like to do.
-
Glad they teach reading comprehension @Muddlebury Virgin Tech. I said IF THEY make that decision, these moves would make the best of a bad situation.CollegeDoog said:I like to retain the coaches of a program that was going nowhere and expect then to suddenly become great. That's what I like to do.
Pretty sure it wasn't an endorsement.
Now, fuck off!!! -
They're not going to retain Wilcox so this thread is fucktarded.
Either way fuck every assistant on the staff. We've always maintained it's the head coach. -
Throw in Nuss... And that staff is better than Sark, but still shit
-
it would be better than Sark, but uw could do better still.
-
Fucking a fat chick is better than stroking one off, but still sucks
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
