Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Jacob Eason
Comments
-
Fromm very well could be better. It’s probably even likely. He looks like a damn good QB like everyone thought he would be. That doesn’t assure that Eason sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People forget that Eason was a 55% passer last year and Fromm is a 63% passer in the same offense this year.RaceBannon said:
Yeah boobs, great job bumping a thread. Good one!!!!1111!!!!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your ass is still bleeding from the bump thread.RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread
My thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover.
Meanwhile when you comment on a thread on your own we get
We probably don't have enough data to prove it year, but Eason appears to be the next Lockner until he isn't.
How's Taggart for football content?
That said, it’s year two under Smart. The whole team is better. They also have two very good RB’s who have stayed healthy (unlike last year) and they run the ball and lean on a great defense.
Maybe Eason isn’t that good and would never start here. It’s a possibility. I appreciate you, but c’mon. All anybody wants is multiple QB’s with talent at UW and for the competition to play out. -
I want competition too.RoadDawg55 said:
Fromm very well could be better. It’s probably even likely. He looks like a damn good QB like everyone thought he would be. That doesn’t assure that Eason sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People forget that Eason was a 55% passer last year and Fromm is a 63% passer in the same offense this year.RaceBannon said:
Yeah boobs, great job bumping a thread. Good one!!!!1111!!!!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your ass is still bleeding from the bump thread.RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread
My thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover.
Meanwhile when you comment on a thread on your own we get
We probably don't have enough data to prove it year, but Eason appears to be the next Lockner until he isn't.
How's Taggart for football content?
That said, it’s year two under Smart. The whole team is better. They also have two very good RB’s who have stayed healthy (unlike last year) and they run the ball and lean on a great defense.
Maybe Eason isn’t that good and would never start here. It’s a possibility. I appreciate you, but c’mon. All anybody wants is multiple QB’s with talent at UW and for the competition to play out.
I just don't see how Eason fits with UW or how UW fits with Eason.
Eason's gunslinger approach doesn't match Peterman and there are better opportunities elsewhere for Eason.
This shit is simple if you evaluate it objectively. -
I’m quite certain you don’t know the meaning of objectiveTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I want competition too.RoadDawg55 said:
Fromm very well could be better. It’s probably even likely. He looks like a damn good QB like everyone thought he would be. That doesn’t assure that Eason sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People forget that Eason was a 55% passer last year and Fromm is a 63% passer in the same offense this year.RaceBannon said:
Yeah boobs, great job bumping a thread. Good one!!!!1111!!!!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your ass is still bleeding from the bump thread.RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread
My thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover.
Meanwhile when you comment on a thread on your own we get
We probably don't have enough data to prove it year, but Eason appears to be the next Lockner until he isn't.
How's Taggart for football content?
That said, it’s year two under Smart. The whole team is better. They also have two very good RB’s who have stayed healthy (unlike last year) and they run the ball and lean on a great defense.
Maybe Eason isn’t that good and would never start here. It’s a possibility. I appreciate you, but c’mon. All anybody wants is multiple QB’s with talent at UW and for the competition to play out.
I just don't see how Eason fits with UW or how UW fits with Eason.
Eason's gunslinger approach doesn't match Peterman and there are better opportunities elsewhere for Eason.
This shit is simple if you evaluate it objectively. -
RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread -
Without bias might be a better term than objective.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
I’m quite certain you don’t know the meaning of objectiveTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I want competition too.RoadDawg55 said:
Fromm very well could be better. It’s probably even likely. He looks like a damn good QB like everyone thought he would be. That doesn’t assure that Eason sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People forget that Eason was a 55% passer last year and Fromm is a 63% passer in the same offense this year.RaceBannon said:
Yeah boobs, great job bumping a thread. Good one!!!!1111!!!!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your ass is still bleeding from the bump thread.RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread
My thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover.
Meanwhile when you comment on a thread on your own we get
We probably don't have enough data to prove it year, but Eason appears to be the next Lockner until he isn't.
How's Taggart for football content?
That said, it’s year two under Smart. The whole team is better. They also have two very good RB’s who have stayed healthy (unlike last year) and they run the ball and lean on a great defense.
Maybe Eason isn’t that good and would never start here. It’s a possibility. I appreciate you, but c’mon. All anybody wants is multiple QB’s with talent at UW and for the competition to play out.
I just don't see how Eason fits with UW or how UW fits with Eason.
Eason's gunslinger approach doesn't match Peterman and there are better opportunities elsewhere for Eason.
This shit is simple if you evaluate it objectively.
Good catch. -
#IStandWithBoobs
-
Praise be to Allah for his healing power.Dennis_DeYoung said:#IStandWithBoobs
-
So if Fromm is benefiting from better coaching this season it stands to reason that Eason could benefit from better coaching at UW, correct?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Fair. Fromm is benefiting from a better game plan.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Since you seem to care about stats you might want to consider that Georgia threw the ball about 60% more with Eason last season, and Georgia is rushing for more than 70 more yards per game this season than last.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People forget that Eason was a 55% passer last year and Fromm is a 63% passer in the same offense this year.RaceBannon said:
Yeah boobs, great job bumping a thread. Good one!!!!1111!!!!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your ass is still bleeding from the bump thread.RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread
My thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover.
Meanwhile when you comment on a thread on your own we get
We probably don't have enough data to prove it year, but Eason appears to be the next Lockner until he isn't.
How's Taggart for football content?
There's room for doubt here because the sample size is small, but Eason appears to suck. -
I'm not sure he'll get better coaching at UWBleachedAnusDawg said:
So if Fromm is benefiting from better coaching this season it stands to reason that Eason could benefit from better coaching at UW, correct?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Fair. Fromm is benefiting from a better game plan.BleachedAnusDawg said:
Since you seem to care about stats you might want to consider that Georgia threw the ball about 60% more with Eason last season, and Georgia is rushing for more than 70 more yards per game this season than last.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People forget that Eason was a 55% passer last year and Fromm is a 63% passer in the same offense this year.RaceBannon said:
Yeah boobs, great job bumping a thread. Good one!!!!1111!!!!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your ass is still bleeding from the bump thread.RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread
My thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover.
Meanwhile when you comment on a thread on your own we get
We probably don't have enough data to prove it year, but Eason appears to be the next Lockner until he isn't.
How's Taggart for football content?
There's room for doubt here because the sample size is small, but Eason appears to suck. -
Unless Skinny is some kinda lockerroom poison, there's zero downside to bringing him now that Yankoff & Sirmon are signed. LIPO
-
This would be useful info if our? choices were between Fromm and Eason but my sources are telling me that Fromm ain’t coming here. Now we? need to figure out what to do when NoodleBoy LEAVES!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
People forget that Eason was a 55% passer last year and Fromm is a 63% passer in the same offense this year.RaceBannon said:
Yeah boobs, great job bumping a thread. Good one!!!!1111!!!!!!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Your ass is still bleeding from the bump thread.RaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread
My thoughts and prayers are with you as you recover.
Meanwhile when you comment on a thread on your own we get
We probably don't have enough data to prove it year, but Eason appears to be the next Lockner until he isn't.
How's Taggart for football content? -
The make-up sex is going to be amazing.whlinder said:
I always knew the simmering Boobs vs DDY feud would explode, I just didn’t think it would happen so soonRaceBannon said:Boobs v DDY is not pretty
Boobs in this thread -
Watch an Eason cut up on draft breakdown.
He makes some throws that make you go holy fuck that'a amazing.
But for everyone of those he has 2-3 where you are like wtf were you thinking?
He can be inaccurate at times but he can actually make plays outside the pocket with his arm (Hi Jake!)
He has the it factor though.
He would be amazing with decent coaching and less coke!!
If he comes here and starts he is going to rape the Pac-10 (fuck you @89ute and @BuffBuffPass)
The Tennesse game he makes like 5-10 amazing throws but he's wildy inconsistent. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Fair poont about wasting scholarships in guys like Pulu.Dennis_DeYoung said:
lol 'waste a scholarship' - Baabs is now the keeper of the numbers!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Eason is more talented, but I haven't seen him do anything on the field to prove he is better.Gladstone said:@TierbsHsotBoobs even a low rent sperg like you can admit Eason >>>> Browning.
I see no reason to waste a scholarship on him for three years when he won't be playing.
Good point. Who would want to pass up a great opportunity to put Jared Pulu on scholarship and take a chance on a guy who could be the best QB at UW since Tui?
Eason only has two years left though. He's not a superstar and UW has two guys with superstar potential and four years available.
The REAL question is why would Eason LEAVE Georgia to face competition at UW. He should go to UCLA instead.
He could easily take over and run the offense in 2019 and 2020. Then 2021 and 2022 would be Sirmon or Yankoff. Kid definitely has the confidence to think he could beat the two freshman out.
UCLA isn't a bad choice but UW is a bit ahead of them in the process and close to home (if that matters to him). -
Skinny don't wanna run and won't be playing for ChipTommySQC said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Fair poont about wasting scholarships in guys like Pulu.Dennis_DeYoung said:
lol 'waste a scholarship' - Baabs is now the keeper of the numbers!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Eason is more talented, but I haven't seen him do anything on the field to prove he is better.Gladstone said:@TierbsHsotBoobs even a low rent sperg like you can admit Eason >>>> Browning.
I see no reason to waste a scholarship on him for three years when he won't be playing.
Good point. Who would want to pass up a great opportunity to put Jared Pulu on scholarship and take a chance on a guy who could be the best QB at UW since Tui?
Eason only has two years left though. He's not a superstar and UW has two guys with superstar potential and four years available.
The REAL question is why would Eason LEAVE Georgia to face competition at UW. He should go to UCLA instead.
He could easily take over and run the offense in 2019 and 2020. Then 2021 and 2022 would be Sirmon or Yankoff. Kid definitely has the confidence to think he could beat the two freshman out.
UCLA isn't a bad choice but UW is a bit ahead of them in the process and close to home (if that matters to him). -
Skinny could be amazing or he could suck, it'll be interesting either way.
-
This feels an awful lot like when I was a kid and would hear my two dads fighting in the kitchen.
-
biak1 said:
This feels an awful lot like when I was a kid and would hear my two dads fucking in the kitchen.
-
The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here. -
This motherfucker gets it.uzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here. -
Personally, I would rather have Chip Kelly or Bill Bellicheck for OC.uzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here. -
Eason has a cocaine addiction and a batshit crazy Dad. I don’t think Pete will even want him.
-
Eason would have two Springs and one season to learn the offense, personnel and coaching staff. He’d be a lot older with all this offensive talent as Sophs/Jrs. I love it.
-
He's coming hereuzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here. -
I have all the screenshots I needdnc said:
He's coming hereuzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here. -
To be fair @dnc was looking at @Swaye and pointing at his ass when he said thisdnc said:
He's coming hereuzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here. -
LoneStarDawg said:
To be fair @dnc was looking at @Swaye and pointing at his ass when he said thisdnc said:
He's coming hereuzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here.
-
Good point fuckbag.uzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here. -
Someone seems salty... maybe because I suggested the recruiting board before anybody else here.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Good point fuckbag.uzi said:The funny thing about all of this debate is... where is the evidence that there is even a chance of UW taking Eason, or Eason wanting to come here?
You guys might as well be debating whether or not Scott Frost would be a good OC here.
