Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

#12 Dev!?!? Culp

2

Comments

  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,807 Swaye's Wigwam
    BallzDeep said:

    chuck said:

    Looks like Culp could be the big back in this class. What do you think @BallzDeep?

    Stud but TE all the way.
    Boring.

    Correct, but still... He's a Mack truck rounding the corner on those sweeps.

    UW has an amazing collection of TEs.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    chuck said:

    BallzDeep said:

    chuck said:

    Looks like Culp could be the big back in this class. What do you think @BallzDeep?

    Stud but TE all the way.
    Boring.

    Correct, but still... He's a Mack truck rounding the corner on those sweeps.

    UW has an amazing collection of TEs.
    I know the TE screen is a universally dreaded play, but with Culp/Bryant we actually have two guys who could succeed in a play like that.
    Don't even say that.
  • FKA_Mousecop
    FKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054

    chuck said:

    BallzDeep said:

    chuck said:

    Looks like Culp could be the big back in this class. What do you think @BallzDeep?

    Stud but TE all the way.
    Boring.

    Correct, but still... He's a Mack truck rounding the corner on those sweeps.

    UW has an amazing collection of TEs.
    I know the TE screen is a universally dreaded play, but with Culp/Bryant we actually have two guys who could succeed in a play like that.
    Don't even say that.
    More speaking to their athleticism than suggesting it lol. Don't worry, Smiff is gone, so it doesn't matter if he reads these boreds.
  • Woof
    Woof Member Posts: 770
    Watched all of the hudls today for the first time and Culp's was the most surprising - in a good way. I don't think he is quite as quick laterally as Bryant, but he seems maybe a tad faster. Seeing a guy that is 6'4 240 outrun an entire defense is a thing of beauty.

    Runner up was Mele. Dude is very light on his feet for a big guy.

    Newton on the other hand was BRBSeppuku.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223

    chuck said:

    BallzDeep said:

    chuck said:

    Looks like Culp could be the big back in this class. What do you think @BallzDeep?

    Stud but TE all the way.
    Boring.

    Correct, but still... He's a Mack truck rounding the corner on those sweeps.

    UW has an amazing collection of TEs.
    I know the TE screen is a universally dreaded play, but with Culp/Bryant we actually have two guys who could succeed in a play like that.
    I actually love a good WR screen ... almost impossible to stop if you have the right players in place
  • RhythmicSlappingDawg
    RhythmicSlappingDawg Member Posts: 1,176
    Tequilla said:

    chuck said:

    BallzDeep said:

    chuck said:

    Looks like Culp could be the big back in this class. What do you think @BallzDeep?

    Stud but TE all the way.
    Boring.

    Correct, but still... He's a Mack truck rounding the corner on those sweeps.

    UW has an amazing collection of TEs.
    I know the TE screen is a universally dreaded play, but with Culp/Bryant we actually have two guys who could succeed in a play like that.
    I actually love a good WR screen ... almost impossible to stop if you have the right players in place
    I've only seen one tunnel screen work at an elite level of play.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    As @Woof stated, Culp isn't Hunter Bryant ... but that's not a bad thing. Bryant is a genetic freak.

    What you see with Culp is a matchup nightmare ... particularly if both him and Bryant are on the field at the same time ... that's just insane to think about.

    But for as much fun as that is to think about in the passing game, Culp's film shows that he's a willing blocker.

    That's what's so encouraging to me is that for a 2 TE system to really work well you need to have both TEs be as willing and capable of blockers as they are in the receiving game.

    We're definitely at an elite level at the TE position with guys like Bryant and Culp on the roster.
  • RhythmicSlappingDawg
    RhythmicSlappingDawg Member Posts: 1,176
    Tequilla said:

    As @Woof stated, Culp isn't Hunter Bryant ... but that's not a bad thing. Bryant is a genetic freak.

    What you see with Culp is a matchup nightmare ... particularly if both him and Bryant are on the field at the same time ... that's just insane to think about.

    But for as much fun as that is to think about in the passing game, Culp's film shows that he's a willing blocker.

    That's what's so encouraging to me is that for a 2 TE system to really work well you need to have both TEs be as willing and capable of blockers as they are in the receiving game.

    We're definitely at an elite level at the TE position with guys like Bryant and Culp on the roster.

    Bryant is basically a 245 pound WR. Although, Culp may be a little faster and he's definitely bigger.
  • FKA_Mousecop
    FKA_Mousecop Member Posts: 2,054

    Tequilla said:

    As @Woof stated, Culp isn't Hunter Bryant ... but that's not a bad thing. Bryant is a genetic freak.

    What you see with Culp is a matchup nightmare ... particularly if both him and Bryant are on the field at the same time ... that's just insane to think about.

    But for as much fun as that is to think about in the passing game, Culp's film shows that he's a willing blocker.

    That's what's so encouraging to me is that for a 2 TE system to really work well you need to have both TEs be as willing and capable of blockers as they are in the receiving game.

    We're definitely at an elite level at the TE position with guys like Bryant and Culp on the roster.

    Bryant is basically a 245 pound WR. Although, Culp may be a little faster and he's definitely bigger.
    He measured in at 6'3" 235, but he probably ends up bigger.