Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sarkisian: 2012 Huskies couldn't overcome the youth factor

1…34689…13

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HillsboroDuck said:

    NorthLakeDub said:

    RaceBannon said:

    We've been whooooshed

    I'm not familiar with this term. What does it mean?
    Hi Harv?

    NorthLakeDub is a bit less obvious than QueenAnneCoog.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ACSlaterDawg
    ACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    NorthLakeDub said:

    Steve_Bowman said:

    Nothing will change.

    As a bench warmer in the SEC, I played very little, but I did see how winning teams are built. Cream Puff is not even close.

    Southerndawg said:

    Lack of preparedness, direction, attitude, toughness, player development and accountability. These are coaching problems. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see things changing until a new head coach takes over.

    And after having a 12-1 season as BYU QB, and being a protege under Pete Carroll at USC, Sark knows absolutely nothing about how a winning team is built. He has never seen what a winning team looks like, has he?

    So I guess you must have some kind of privileged insider's perspective of the UW program and you see the daily ins and outs of the program that leads you to the conclusion that nothing will change and Sark is not even close to building a winning team?
    I watch the games. That's all I need to see to know that Sark is not even close to building a winning team.

    HTH
    7-6>7-6>7-6. Hope THAT helps.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthLakeDub
    NorthLakeDub Member Posts: 47
    Swaye said:

    NorthLakeDub said:


    So if they had been 9-4 last season like they should have been, then would you say the program is in good condition? A couple of stupid fluke losses away from being 9-4 and the program is hopeless? Yes those losses were an embarrassment and inexcusable mistakes. But that does not define where the program is currently at.

    The program rose to respectability the last 4 years, and now with the new Husky Stadium and facilities upgrades, we can finally "take the next step" (I know you all love that quote from last season haha) to elite status.

    We fell behind in the facilities race for far too long. Not even Nick Saban could win the Pac 12 with a piece of shit stadium with a fucking track around the field, and a decade of miserable losing seasons.

    Disagree.
    You disagree on Saban?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthLakeDub
    NorthLakeDub Member Posts: 47
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    NorthLakeDub said:

    Steve_Bowman said:

    Nothing will change.

    As a bench warmer in the SEC, I played very little, but I did see how winning teams are built. Cream Puff is not even close.

    Southerndawg said:

    Lack of preparedness, direction, attitude, toughness, player development and accountability. These are coaching problems. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see things changing until a new head coach takes over.

    And after having a 12-1 season as BYU QB, and being a protege under Pete Carroll at USC, Sark knows absolutely nothing about how a winning team is built. He has never seen what a winning team looks like, has he?

    So I guess you must have some kind of privileged insider's perspective of the UW program and you see the daily ins and outs of the program that leads you to the conclusion that nothing will change and Sark is not even close to building a winning team?
    I watch the games. That's all I need to see to know that Sark is not even close to building a winning team.

    HTH
    Well I guess you are a glass half empty and I am a glass half full point of view on the current state of the program. But my expectations are not any lower than yours. I expect championship level football, and that is where I think we will be.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthLakeDub
    NorthLakeDub Member Posts: 47
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    HillsboroDuck said:

    NorthLakeDub said:

    RaceBannon said:

    We've been whooooshed

    I'm not familiar with this term. What does it mean?
    Hi Harv?

    NorthLakeDub is a bit less obvious than QueenAnneCoog.
    If you guys think I am some old poster named Harv, I am not. I am new to this forum. I have read the articles posted in the past.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthLakeDub
    NorthLakeDub Member Posts: 47
    ACSlaterDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    NorthLakeDub said:

    Steve_Bowman said:

    Nothing will change.

    As a bench warmer in the SEC, I played very little, but I did see how winning teams are built. Cream Puff is not even close.

    Southerndawg said:

    Lack of preparedness, direction, attitude, toughness, player development and accountability. These are coaching problems. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see things changing until a new head coach takes over.

    And after having a 12-1 season as BYU QB, and being a protege under Pete Carroll at USC, Sark knows absolutely nothing about how a winning team is built. He has never seen what a winning team looks like, has he?

    So I guess you must have some kind of privileged insider's perspective of the UW program and you see the daily ins and outs of the program that leads you to the conclusion that nothing will change and Sark is not even close to building a winning team?
    I watch the games. That's all I need to see to know that Sark is not even close to building a winning team.

    HTH
    7-6>7-6>7-6. Hope THAT helps.

    And if we don't get to at least 9-4 in 2013 then its time to make some changes. But like I said before, I think we'll get 10 wins. We will win out at home this year, yes even beating the Ducks, finally!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    NorthLakeDub said:

    Swaye said:

    NorthLakeDub said:


    So if they had been 9-4 last season like they should have been, then would you say the program is in good condition? A couple of stupid fluke losses away from being 9-4 and the program is hopeless? Yes those losses were an embarrassment and inexcusable mistakes. But that does not define where the program is currently at.

    The program rose to respectability the last 4 years, and now with the new Husky Stadium and facilities upgrades, we can finally "take the next step" (I know you all love that quote from last season haha) to elite status.

    We fell behind in the facilities race for far too long. Not even Nick Saban could win the Pac 12 with a piece of shit stadium with a fucking track around the field, and a decade of miserable losing seasons.

    Disagree.
    You disagree on Saban?

    Yes. I think Saban could win with two tracks around the field. Don James won big with a track around the field. Sure, facilities matter, but did you ever see the dump that Miami won all those NC's in? At the end of the day all you need is a solid AD and a great Coach, and Saban is a great college football Coach. He would win and win quickly here, no matter the stadium.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,413 Standard Supporter
    NorthLakeDub said:

    ACSlaterDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    NorthLakeDub said:

    Steve_Bowman said:

    Nothing will change.

    As a bench warmer in the SEC, I played very little, but I did see how winning teams are built. Cream Puff is not even close.

    Southerndawg said:

    Lack of preparedness, direction, attitude, toughness, player development and accountability. These are coaching problems. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see things changing until a new head coach takes over.

    And after having a 12-1 season as BYU QB, and being a protege under Pete Carroll at USC, Sark knows absolutely nothing about how a winning team is built. He has never seen what a winning team looks like, has he?

    So I guess you must have some kind of privileged insider's perspective of the UW program and you see the daily ins and outs of the program that leads you to the conclusion that nothing will change and Sark is not even close to building a winning team?
    I watch the games. That's all I need to see to know that Sark is not even close to building a winning team.

    HTH
    7-6>7-6>7-6. Hope THAT helps.

    And if we don't get to at least 9-4 in 2013 then its time to make some changes. But like I said before, I think we'll get 10 wins. We will win out at home this year, yes even beating the Ducks, finally!

    You were doing pretty well until the "even beating the Yucks (LOL), finally!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ACSlaterDawg
    ACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200
    The facilities argument is completely flaccid. USC has consistently had the worst facilities in the conference. As soon as Carroll showed up they started kicking ass again. Oregon's program turned around before most of the facilities improvements. The reason it turned around was because the conference sucked in the mid to late 90s and they were able to string together 4-4 and 5-3 conference records which would be inflated by their non-conference schedule, Kansas St-lite. They had all the great facilities before Chip but never became the national program they thought they were. It was Chip who took them there.

    You will see in the next few years that the new facilities will not elevate mediocre-Sark to a sudden championship coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthLakeDub
    NorthLakeDub Member Posts: 47
    Swaye said:

    NorthLakeDub said:

    Swaye said:

    NorthLakeDub said:


    So if they had been 9-4 last season like they should have been, then would you say the program is in good condition? A couple of stupid fluke losses away from being 9-4 and the program is hopeless? Yes those losses were an embarrassment and inexcusable mistakes. But that does not define where the program is currently at.

    The program rose to respectability the last 4 years, and now with the new Husky Stadium and facilities upgrades, we can finally "take the next step" (I know you all love that quote from last season haha) to elite status.

    We fell behind in the facilities race for far too long. Not even Nick Saban could win the Pac 12 with a piece of shit stadium with a fucking track around the field, and a decade of miserable losing seasons.

    Disagree.
    You disagree on Saban?

    Yes. I think Saban could win with two tracks around the field. Don James won big with a track around the field. Sure, facilities matter, but did you ever see the dump that Miami won all those NC's in? At the end of the day all you need is a solid AD and a great Coach, and Saban is a great college football Coach. He would win and win quickly here, no matter the stadium.
    Any coach at Saban's level, at that point in his career, would not take the job with a track around the field and crumbling stadium.

    Yes, James won with the track around the field, 20-30 years ago. Husky Stadium was cool back in the 80's and early 90's. Look, I love the old Husky Stadium because of all the great memories there. But let's face it, it was damn embarrassing having a crumbling stadium with an ugly ass track around the field, with the fans on the west end sitting 50 yards away from the endzone.

    Last time I checked the AD doesn't call any of the plays. As long as the AD puts full support behind football and basketball, and makes the right coaching hires, then he is doing his job. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Woodward have a lot to do with the stadium being rebuilt? I'd say that is a pretty big accomplishment.

    6-5-1, 6-6, 7-5, 6-6. Nick Saban's first four years as a head coach at Michigan State. His first four years as a head coach were proof that he would never become a great college coach.....oh wait, actually he turned out to be pretty damn good.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter