Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Doing Doog's work. Cinc Raisens, The U edition.
Comments
-
Fair poont. I'll take it under consideration.NorwegianHusky said:
Ignoring how clever that pun is, isn't it more than just a little redundant to change a guy's name when it already means "The Bastard"?creepycoug said:
Couple things:Doog_de_Jour said:
That was really fantastic though difficult to watch as I can't stand Dan Le Batard. The fact that they glossed over how Miami shared the national title with the Huskies pissed me off too. Still, I really appreciated learning about Howard Schnellenberger and Jimmy Johnson's time there (being on the Gen X-Millennial cusp my memories of Jimmy only really stretch back to his time with the Cowboys).AZDuck said:
I felt that way about Miami until I watched "The U" ESPN 30 for 30. Hands down the best sports documentary I have ever seenDoog_de_Jour said:Bravo @89ute. "Tray Adams", "Vita Virta" and "Josh Ross IIII" made me laugh like an idiot hyena.
I must say, I loathe Miami, but after seeing their fans' response to your post I may have to rethink that opinion.
- In Cane circles, we call him, predictably, Dan LeRetard. See what we did there?
- Re gloss-overs, the entire pre-ND game hype focused entirely on the ’88 loss at South Bend (which only happened because of an acknowledged horrible fumble call on Cleveland Gary at the ND goal line) and the Whaambulance 'Gerry Foust' game. No mention of the ass-kicking Miami laid on them the next year when they were No. 1 (3rd and 43 baby) or the 24-0 Tim Brown and Ricky Waters beat-down. -
I can't remember, was ISAFNRC the result of a Cinq Raisons or no?
-
No.AZDuck said:I can't remember, was ISAFNRC the result of a Cinq Raisons or no?
Feeding tube troll job of BRO. Some of his better later work. I believe it came from a thread comparing Miles Jack and Shaq Thompson. -
Wooooooooosh-icane.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Hang
Plagiarism common here dude.Bread said:
Plagiarism? I don't know the rules here, but in most communities that is a TOS violation.89ute said:
That's actually the work of @dhdawg, I copied his Fresno 5 reasons but I did change the roman numerals on Josh Ross. I liked IIII better.Doog_de_Jour said:Bravo @89ute. "Tray Adams", "Vita Virta" and "Josh Ross IIII" made me laugh like an idiot hyena.
I must say, I loathe Miami, but after seeing their fans' response to your post I may have to rethink that opinion.
... unless he copied it from someone else?
That's the joke. -
I was looking through some old scrolls the other day as I sat in Hades reminiscing about the past and found one I sent the Gaulish rebels I waged an expeditionem against in 'XXIX. I wanted them to think I was an asinus and would be attacking elsewhere, so I addressed the scroll to the rebels of Hispania but had it sent to Gaul instead. It read as follows:GrundleStiltzkin said:
Congratulatio on the great rebellium so far!!I!III!!II I'm coming to the peninsula next month and here are V reasons why I think my she-wolves will plunger your barbarians:
I. Marcus "the Aegyptian" Antonius. He is the summa hominem on the field, enuff said on that. He has II inches of thunder under his toga and will do everything he can to win the concubines.
II. Infantry line. We average CCCXXXII across the phalanx and will dominate the line of procurso. Pompeius Magnus, Titus Pullo, Centrum, Gallus, Ossai, Decimus, etc. These boys have habitus and are READY TO RUMBLE.
III. Agrippa. A novus defensive scheme and a novus habitus. Everyone is talking about the diversitas between Agrippa in 'XXVIII and Agrippa in 'XXIX BCE. You will see a much improved defense on XI/XXIX.
IV. Rapidus, rapidus, rapidus. This is the fastest team Rome has had in a decennium. Lucius Vorenus, Quintus Pedius, Gaius Maecenas, Fabius Valens, Gnaeus Geta, Manius Navius. The adolescens will be inexperienced but will provide a novus dimension Rome hasn't had in a long time. Rapidus.
V. Tempus of Possessionem. I think the SPQR can dominate the TOP stat in this game. The more the offense can shorten the battle and keep the defense off the field the better fortuna my TEAT SUCKLERS will have at winning.
I think the Empire wins this game rather easily. Say XXXIV-XVII?????? -
POTW. YBFE.Octavian said:
I was looking through some old scrolls the other day as I sat in Hades reminiscing about the past and found one I sent the Gaulish rebels I waged an expeditionem against in 'XXIX. I wanted them to think I was an asinus and would be attacking elsewhere, so I addressed the scroll to the rebels of Hispania but had it sent to Gaul instead. It read as follows:GrundleStiltzkin said:
Congratulatio on the great rebellium so far!!I!III!!II I'm coming to the peninsula next month and here are V reasons why I think my she-wolves will plunger your barbarians:
I. Marcus "the Aegyptian" Antonius. He is the summa hominem on the field, enuff said on that. He has II inches of thunder under his toga and will do everything he can to win the concubines.
II. Infantry line. We average CCCXXXII across the phalanx and will dominate the line of procurso. Pompeius Magnus, Titus Pullo, Centrum, Gallus, Ossai, Decimus, etc. These boys have habitus and are READY TO RUMBLE.
III. Agrippa. A novus defensive scheme and a novus habitus. Everyone is talking about the dissimilitudo between Agrippa in 'XXVIII and Agrippa in 'XXIX BCE. You will see a much improved defense on XI/XXIX.
IV. Rapidus, rapidus, rapidus. This is the fastest team Rome has had in a decennium. Lucius Vorenus, Quintus Pedius, Gaius Maecenas, Fabius Valens, Gnaeus Geta, Manius Navius. The adolescens will be inexperienced but will provide a novus dimension Rome hasn't had in a long time. Rapidus.
V. Tempus of Possessionem. I think the SPQR can dominate the TOP stat in this game. The more the offense can shorten the battle and keep the defense off the field the better fortuna my TEAT SUCKLERS will have at winning.
I think the Empire wins this game rather easily. Say XXXIV-XVII?????? -
I laffed like an idiot hyena. POTDOctavian said:
I was looking through some old scrolls the other day as I sat in Hades reminiscing about the past and found one I sent the Gaulish rebels I waged an expeditionem against in 'XXIX. I wanted them to think I was an asinus and would be attacking elsewhere, so I addressed the scroll to the rebels of Hispania but had it sent to Gaul instead. It read as follows:GrundleStiltzkin said:
Congratulatio on the great rebellium so far!!I!III!!II I'm coming to the peninsula next month and here are V reasons why I think my she-wolves will plunger your barbarians:
I. Marcus "the Aegyptian" Antonius. He is the summa hominem on the field, enuff said on that. He has II inches of thunder under his toga and will do everything he can to win the concubines.
II. Infantry line. We average CCCXXXII across the phalanx and will dominate the line of procurso. Pompeius Magnus, Titus Pullo, Centrum, Gallus, Ossai, Decimus, etc. These boys have habitus and are READY TO RUMBLE.
III. Agrippa. A novus defensive scheme and a novus habitus. Everyone is talking about the diversitas between Agrippa in 'XXVIII and Agrippa in 'XXIX BCE. You will see a much improved defense on XI/XXIX.
IV. Rapidus, rapidus, rapidus. This is the fastest team Rome has had in a decennium. Lucius Vorenus, Quintus Pedius, Gaius Maecenas, Fabius Valens, Gnaeus Geta, Manius Navius. The adolescens will be inexperienced but will provide a novus dimension Rome hasn't had in a long time. Rapidus.
V. Tempus of Possessionem. I think the SPQR can dominate the TOP stat in this game. The more the offense can shorten the battle and keep the defense off the field the better fortuna my TEAT SUCKLERS will have at winning.
I think the Empire wins this game rather easily. Say XXXIV-XVII?????? -
OssaiOctavian said:
I was looking through some old scrolls the other day as I sat in Hades reminiscing about the past and found one I sent the Gaulish rebels I waged an expeditionem against in 'XXIX. I wanted them to think I was an asinus and would be attacking elsewhere, so I addressed the scroll to the rebels of Hispania but had it sent to Gaul instead. It read as follows:GrundleStiltzkin said:
Congratulatio on the great rebellium so far!!I!III!!II I'm coming to the peninsula next month and here are V reasons why I think my she-wolves will plunger your barbarians:
I. Marcus "the Aegyptian" Antonius. He is the summa hominem on the field, enuff said on that. He has II inches of thunder under his toga and will do everything he can to win the concubines.
II. Infantry line. We average CCCXXXII across the phalanx and will dominate the line of procurso. Pompeius Magnus, Titus Pullo, Centrum, Gallus, Ossai, Decimus, etc. These boys have habitus and are READY TO RUMBLE.
III. Agrippa. A novus defensive scheme and a novus habitus. Everyone is talking about the diversitas between Agrippa in 'XXVIII and Agrippa in 'XXIX BCE. You will see a much improved defense on XI/XXIX.
IV. Rapidus, rapidus, rapidus. This is the fastest team Rome has had in a decennium. Lucius Vorenus, Quintus Pedius, Gaius Maecenas, Fabius Valens, Gnaeus Geta, Manius Navius. The adolescens will be inexperienced but will provide a novus dimension Rome hasn't had in a long time. Rapidus.
V. Tempus of Possessionem. I think the SPQR can dominate the TOP stat in this game. The more the offense can shorten the battle and keep the defense off the field the better fortuna my TEAT SUCKLERS will have at winning.
I think the Empire wins this game rather easily. Say XXXIV-XVII??????
lol
