Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

TSiO Episode #40: UCLA Review, Oregon Preview, Recruiting

2»

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,696 Founders Club
    89ute said:

    As one of the six visitors to theseasonisover.com I'd like to see the recruiting data expanded to include other teams.

    Jesus. Christ.

    Here’s some recruiting data: Utah got ass raped by shit Oregon so you’re not recruiting anyone who will change your pseudo-mw status.
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419

    Bread said:

    Gaskin is totally hiesman level.

    if he was the rb at Penn State, Ohio State, or bama he would be the front runner.

    been better then saquon all three years.

    Holy fuck some of you overrate our players. Gaskin is damn good. He’s not really a Heisman type though.
    Gaskin deserves all the praise he gets here and more. Special player and borderline up there
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Gladstone said:

    p.s. the only issue i had with the otherwise fantastic pod was the kawasaki nitpicking. the man is above any and all criticism and you should both publicly apologize to him

    What happens when reason and accountability isn’t on the pod
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    89ute said:

    As one of the six visitors to theseasonisover.com I'd like to see the recruiting data expanded to include other teams. This seems like a monumental task but I thought compiling it on the entire Pac-12 was a tall task but still you queefed it out.

    I'd also like to see you fucks come up with some kind of coaching to talent metric. When I think about UCLA having 46 blue chips with a 2-4 conference record the fucktarded coaching factor has to be incredibly high. On the flip side there's RichRod with 7 blue chips sitting at 4-1. Fucktarded coaching factor low?

    I'm interested to see the new additions you mentioned in the pod.

    Don't ever forget I represent 10% of your listening audience.

    6 goes into 100 16.67 times. That's 16.67%. You said 10%.

    This is funny to me because I am stoopid but apparently know maff better than you.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    89ute said:

    As one of the six visitors to theseasonisover.com I'd like to see the recruiting data expanded to include other teams. This seems like a monumental task but I thought compiling it on the entire Pac-12 was a tall task but still you queefed it out.

    I'd also like to see you fucks come up with some kind of coaching to talent metric. When I think about UCLA having 46 blue chips with a 2-4 conference record the fucktarded coaching factor has to be incredibly high. On the flip side there's RichRod with 7 blue chips sitting at 4-1. Fucktarded coaching factor low?

    I'm interested to see the new additions you mentioned in the pod.

    Don't ever forget I represent 10% of your listening audience.

    Less than 10% now since my 2 dogs listen with me. More like 8% now.
    See above. Never trust a Ute with maff.

    image