This is a GOOD Washington team
Comments
-
We'll know everything about our team after Stanford.
The rest is just bullshit, Stanford will beat ND, just a matter of we'll handle business or not. -
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story. -
This doesn't seem fun for you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
-
LaZoris said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
-
Definitely abundance.LaZoris said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
-
Lol at the Pac11. Doesn't matter who wins the league the losers say they suck
Oregon fans heard it during their run. The league is down
Win the pac12 and see what happens
This is a GOOD Washington team regardless.
As good as most of the past champs and better than some. James won the league at 7-4 for goodness sake -
Agree and disagree. Some of the criticism is warranted. It's been well over a decade since the PAC had a nationally dominant team and a legitimate National Champion. ACC, B1G and SEC have been better at the top and arguably somewhat better top to bottom. That said, there have been, and are, some decent teams in the conference.RaceBannon said:Lol at the Pac11. Doesn't matter who wins the league the losers say they suck
Oregon fans heard it during their run. The league is down
Win the pac12 and see what happens
This is a GOOD Washington team regardless.
As good as most of the past champs and better than some. James won the league at 7-4 for goodness sake
This is a GOOD Washington team. I agree with that. They're not quite Carroll's fighting Trojans or James' vicious Dawgs, but they are GOOD. And they're very well coached. The second half adjustments smack of top level coaching the likes of which the conference hasn't seen since Carroll. The complete disappearance of blowout losses also smacks of top level coaching and discipline. The defense is playing at a championship level and, at times, the offense seems more than capable. The next man up thing has been surprisingly impressive as well. Player development under Peterman is real.
James did win the league at 7-4, true, but that took some help from other teams, and be honest, that team was a hellavu lot better than that record. Throw arrows at that statement, I know it sounds doggish, but it's true. When they pulled their heads out of their collective asses and started playing real football, they were surprisingly good, and they proved it by knocking off the number 4 team in the country in the Rose Bowl in impressive fashion. Oh, and by the way, James, Robinson, Walsh and Donahue were coaches in the league then. It was way stronger and less diluted than today. For goodness sake. -
Fuck you and your 53 seconds.Southerndawg said:LaZoris said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
