Vegas terror attack
Comments
-
And you don't like Damone? He does the Ts&Ps mocking better than anyone. This is a pathetic, white-bread (or perhaps white rice?) summary of some of his best work.RoadDawg55 said:Everyone knows 59 deaths is a tragedy. It's so fucking annoying how everyone has to let everybody else know they are praying for Vegas and what a tragedy this has been.
-
This is incorrect, but I am 50 rounds off. They used to have a 125 round barrel, but I can only find 100 round barrel mags with a quick 5.56 barrel mag search. You get the X locker with one and it's flip and pop and you're back at it. 200 rounds with a one second pause, on Google right now.Sledog said:
Send over one a them 'thar 250 round magamazines will ya Shmarty pants?Mosster47 said:If 250 round magazines didn't exist and only five round magazines were accessable to the public like how they are sold in "hunting AR's" today then this shooting still happens, but is much slower and much less lethal.
You could say they would make their own (they wouldn't) or they would get them from outside the US (not likely).
People have ALWAYS gone crazy and guns have always existed. Look at the mass shooting numbers during the Brady Bill era and compare them to the period after them. When crazy has way more fucking rounds without having to stop to reload or even aim to wipe out hordes of people that's a common sense foul.
Why can't you walk into Wal-Mart and buy a hand grenade? You know the fucking answer, but there is a pause when people talk about taking away 250 round barrel magazines. That's fucking retarded. News flash, an AR with 250 rounds is much more deadly than a hand grenade, yet hand grenades are way too dangerous to sell to the general public.
I own more guns than 90% of America, but I'm not stupid. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
250 round belts yes, magazines no.
This was Nevada where machine gun ownership is legal. But that means he passed an extensive FBI background check. IIRC there have only been 2 murders committed with legally owned machine guns. There's about 250,000 of them in the country.
Continue shit poasting though. -
Says the guy that doesn't even know the proper nomenclature..........Mosster47 said:
This is incorrect, but I am 50 rounds off. They used to have a 125 round barrel, but I can only find 100 round barrel mags with a quick 5.56 barrel mag search. You get the X locker with one and it's flip and pop and you're back at it. 200 rounds with a one second pause, on Google right now.Sledog said:
Send over one a them 'thar 250 round magamazines will ya Shmarty pants?Mosster47 said:If 250 round magazines didn't exist and only five round magazines were accessable to the public like how they are sold in "hunting AR's" today then this shooting still happens, but is much slower and much less lethal.
You could say they would make their own (they wouldn't) or they would get them from outside the US (not likely).
People have ALWAYS gone crazy and guns have always existed. Look at the mass shooting numbers during the Brady Bill era and compare them to the period after them. When crazy has way more fucking rounds without having to stop to reload or even aim to wipe out hordes of people that's a common sense foul.
Why can't you walk into Wal-Mart and buy a hand grenade? You know the fucking answer, but there is a pause when people talk about taking away 250 round barrel magazines. That's fucking retarded. News flash, an AR with 250 rounds is much more deadly than a hand grenade, yet hand grenades are way too dangerous to sell to the general public.
I own more guns than 90% of America, but I'm not stupid. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
250 round belts yes, magazines no.
This was Nevada where machine gun ownership is legal. But that means he passed an extensive FBI background check. IIRC there have only been 2 murders committed with legally owned machine guns. There's about 250,000 of them in the country.
Continue shit poasting though. -
Damone is okay. He's a sandy vag too often. I know his t's and p's shtick.CirrhosisDawg said:
And you don't like Damone? He does the Ts&Ps mocking better than anyone. This is a pathetic, white-bread (or perhaps white rice?) summary of some of his best work.RoadDawg55 said:Everyone knows 59 deaths is a tragedy. It's so fucking annoying how everyone has to let everybody else know they are praying for Vegas and what a tragedy this has been.
I don't get why people feel the need to be the 223rd person to let people know they are praying for Vegas. Every 3 people on fagbook are posting about it.
People pray for Houston, Florida, etc but prayers won't do shit. Money and time will. Of course, nobody actually cares enough to do that, even those with the resources because they already fired off the social media posts about these tragedies. -
Don't disagree except this bored is in desperate need of Damone's shit show. I'd pay $129 if "so I was at a bar" came back in its original form.RoadDawg55 said:
Damone is okay. He's a sandy vag too often. I know his t's and p's shtick.CirrhosisDawg said:
And you don't like Damone? He does the Ts&Ps mocking better than anyone. This is a pathetic, white-bread (or perhaps white rice?) summary of some of his best work.RoadDawg55 said:Everyone knows 59 deaths is a tragedy. It's so fucking annoying how everyone has to let everybody else know they are praying for Vegas and what a tragedy this has been.
I don't get why people feel the need to be the 223rd person to let people know they are praying for Vegas. Every 3 people on fagbook are posting about it.
People pray for Houston, Florida, etc but prayers won't do shit. Money and time will. Of course, nobody actually cares enough to do that, even those with the resources because they already fired off the social media posts about these tragedies.
-
That's the best argument I've seen for stricter gun control. Nice work.Sledog said:
Send over one a them 'thar 250 round magamazines will ya Shmarty pants?Mosster47 said:If 250 round magazines didn't exist and only five round magazines were accessable to the public like how they are sold in "hunting AR's" today then this shooting still happens, but is much slower and much less lethal.
You could say they would make their own (they wouldn't) or they would get them from outside the US (not likely).
People have ALWAYS gone crazy and guns have always existed. Look at the mass shooting numbers during the Brady Bill era and compare them to the period after them. When crazy has way more fucking rounds without having to stop to reload or even aim to wipe out hordes of people that's a common sense foul.
Why can't you walk into Wal-Mart and buy a hand grenade? You know the fucking answer, but there is a pause when people talk about taking away 250 round barrel magazines. That's fucking retarded. News flash, an AR with 250 rounds is much more deadly than a hand grenade, yet hand grenades are way too dangerous to sell to the general public.
I own more guns than 90% of America, but I'm not stupid. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
250 round belts yes, magazines no.
This was Nevada where machine gun ownership is legal. But that means he passed an extensive FBI background check. IIRC there have only been 2 murders committed with legally owned machine guns. There's about 250,000 of them in the country. -
Your argument is to install a "progressive" (code for commie) government. Can't do that while America is armed. That's why the left hates guns as they know they can never have that kind of control. If the left hated murders or murders of minorities, lefty run places like Shitcago would do something about black on black crime. It doesn't even bother you but then "the end justifies the means" eh comrade?2001400ex said:
That's the best argument I've seen for stricter gun control. Nice work.Sledog said:
Send over one a them 'thar 250 round magamazines will ya Shmarty pants?Mosster47 said:If 250 round magazines didn't exist and only five round magazines were accessable to the public like how they are sold in "hunting AR's" today then this shooting still happens, but is much slower and much less lethal.
You could say they would make their own (they wouldn't) or they would get them from outside the US (not likely).
People have ALWAYS gone crazy and guns have always existed. Look at the mass shooting numbers during the Brady Bill era and compare them to the period after them. When crazy has way more fucking rounds without having to stop to reload or even aim to wipe out hordes of people that's a common sense foul.
Why can't you walk into Wal-Mart and buy a hand grenade? You know the fucking answer, but there is a pause when people talk about taking away 250 round barrel magazines. That's fucking retarded. News flash, an AR with 250 rounds is much more deadly than a hand grenade, yet hand grenades are way too dangerous to sell to the general public.
I own more guns than 90% of America, but I'm not stupid. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
250 round belts yes, magazines no.
This was Nevada where machine gun ownership is legal. But that means he passed an extensive FBI background check. IIRC there have only been 2 murders committed with legally owned machine guns. There's about 250,000 of them in the country.
This shooter is either ISIS as they claim or a liberal loon. -
Or he's a right wing gun nut. Or he's crazy with no agenda.Sledog said:
Your argument is to install a "progressive" (code for commie) government. Can't do that while America is armed. That's why the left hates guns as they know they can never have that kind of control. If the left hated murders or murders of minorities, lefty run places like Shitcago would do something about black on black crime. It doesn't even bother you but then "the end justifies the means" eh comrade?2001400ex said:
That's the best argument I've seen for stricter gun control. Nice work.Sledog said:
Send over one a them 'thar 250 round magamazines will ya Shmarty pants?Mosster47 said:If 250 round magazines didn't exist and only five round magazines were accessable to the public like how they are sold in "hunting AR's" today then this shooting still happens, but is much slower and much less lethal.
You could say they would make their own (they wouldn't) or they would get them from outside the US (not likely).
People have ALWAYS gone crazy and guns have always existed. Look at the mass shooting numbers during the Brady Bill era and compare them to the period after them. When crazy has way more fucking rounds without having to stop to reload or even aim to wipe out hordes of people that's a common sense foul.
Why can't you walk into Wal-Mart and buy a hand grenade? You know the fucking answer, but there is a pause when people talk about taking away 250 round barrel magazines. That's fucking retarded. News flash, an AR with 250 rounds is much more deadly than a hand grenade, yet hand grenades are way too dangerous to sell to the general public.
I own more guns than 90% of America, but I'm not stupid. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
250 round belts yes, magazines no.
This was Nevada where machine gun ownership is legal. But that means he passed an extensive FBI background check. IIRC there have only been 2 murders committed with legally owned machine guns. There's about 250,000 of them in the country.
This shooter is either ISIS as they claim or a liberal loon. -
That.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Or he's a right wing gun nut. Or he's crazy with no agenda.Sledog said:
Your argument is to install a "progressive" (code for commie) government. Can't do that while America is armed. That's why the left hates guns as they know they can never have that kind of control. If the left hated murders or murders of minorities, lefty run places like Shitcago would do something about black on black crime. It doesn't even bother you but then "the end justifies the means" eh comrade?2001400ex said:
That's the best argument I've seen for stricter gun control. Nice work.Sledog said:
Send over one a them 'thar 250 round magamazines will ya Shmarty pants?Mosster47 said:If 250 round magazines didn't exist and only five round magazines were accessable to the public like how they are sold in "hunting AR's" today then this shooting still happens, but is much slower and much less lethal.
You could say they would make their own (they wouldn't) or they would get them from outside the US (not likely).
People have ALWAYS gone crazy and guns have always existed. Look at the mass shooting numbers during the Brady Bill era and compare them to the period after them. When crazy has way more fucking rounds without having to stop to reload or even aim to wipe out hordes of people that's a common sense foul.
Why can't you walk into Wal-Mart and buy a hand grenade? You know the fucking answer, but there is a pause when people talk about taking away 250 round barrel magazines. That's fucking retarded. News flash, an AR with 250 rounds is much more deadly than a hand grenade, yet hand grenades are way too dangerous to sell to the general public.
I own more guns than 90% of America, but I'm not stupid. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
250 round belts yes, magazines no.
This was Nevada where machine gun ownership is legal. But that means he passed an extensive FBI background check. IIRC there have only been 2 murders committed with legally owned machine guns. There's about 250,000 of them in the country.
This shooter is either ISIS as they claim or a liberal loon. -
Either way it will be chinteresting.GrundleStiltzkin said:
That.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Or he's a right wing gun nut. Or he's crazy with no agenda.Sledog said:
Your argument is to install a "progressive" (code for commie) government. Can't do that while America is armed. That's why the left hates guns as they know they can never have that kind of control. If the left hated murders or murders of minorities, lefty run places like Shitcago would do something about black on black crime. It doesn't even bother you but then "the end justifies the means" eh comrade?2001400ex said:
That's the best argument I've seen for stricter gun control. Nice work.Sledog said:
Send over one a them 'thar 250 round magamazines will ya Shmarty pants?Mosster47 said:If 250 round magazines didn't exist and only five round magazines were accessable to the public like how they are sold in "hunting AR's" today then this shooting still happens, but is much slower and much less lethal.
You could say they would make their own (they wouldn't) or they would get them from outside the US (not likely).
People have ALWAYS gone crazy and guns have always existed. Look at the mass shooting numbers during the Brady Bill era and compare them to the period after them. When crazy has way more fucking rounds without having to stop to reload or even aim to wipe out hordes of people that's a common sense foul.
Why can't you walk into Wal-Mart and buy a hand grenade? You know the fucking answer, but there is a pause when people talk about taking away 250 round barrel magazines. That's fucking retarded. News flash, an AR with 250 rounds is much more deadly than a hand grenade, yet hand grenades are way too dangerous to sell to the general public.
I own more guns than 90% of America, but I'm not stupid. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
250 round belts yes, magazines no.
This was Nevada where machine gun ownership is legal. But that means he passed an extensive FBI background check. IIRC there have only been 2 murders committed with legally owned machine guns. There's about 250,000 of them in the country.
This shooter is either ISIS as they claim or a liberal loon.
