Myles Jack's Problem with UW Coaches
Comments
-
MikeDamone said:
link?dnc said:
yesMikeDamone said:
Is there any other kind of AIDS? Is there half blown or a quarter blown? Can you get just a touch of the AIDS?Swaye said:
I was deciding whether or not to bang out a chick I was pretty sure would give me FULL BLOWN AIDS. I drank until I fell down instead. Alcohol saved my life.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
At that point, college football is the biggest decision of their lives and if they're potentially a great player, that decision will impact them in their professional careers as well.alumni94 said:
I hope college football is not the biggest decision of their lives. If it is, that is sad.CollegeDoog said:I like to talk shit about 18 year old kids making the biggest decision of their lives. that's what I like to do.
What major, life decisions were you making at age 18?
-
There's definitely something wrong with Sark's recruiting of big athletic offensive/defensive linemen and linebackers and from the results, it doesn't seem to matter whether the kids are instate or not. He isn't doing well in recruiting the line and linebacker positions from any state.Passion said:For those that closely followed the recruitment of Garnett and Banner, this is the same condescending shit that UW used previously.
Can't believe Sark actually thinks this is a winning approach.
I find it difficult to believe that UW recruiters are losing recruits with these most important grunt skills simply because their pitch of the program to teenagers is condescending or insulting. I think it's something more endemic to Sark's brand of Husky Football.
I think I read somewhere that Myles Jack had been on our campus many times during the few(or two?) years he'd lived in Bellevue. The local kids in whom the UW has shown interest are I believe likely to know a lot more about Sark's program than we or the mainstream and Internet media. They could be turned off by other things such as position coaches, the weight room, conditioning program, etc. that might lead recruits to believe that the positions they're being recruited to play just aren't as important to Sark and staff as they should be. Whatever, we definitely have a serious problem.
-
Those types of players don't like to play for pussies.Tailgater said:
There's definitely something wrong with Sark's recruiting of big athletic offensive/defensive linemen and linebackers and from the results, it doesn't seem to matter whether the kids are instate or not. He isn't doing well in recruiting the line and linebacker positions from any state.Passion said:For those that closely followed the recruitment of Garnett and Banner, this is the same condescending shit that UW used previously.
Can't believe Sark actually thinks this is a winning approach. -
I never realized it but they really have sucked at recruiting LB's since he has been here. Timu is okay but had to play too early. Feeney should have never had to play LB so early as he was too skinny.
Other than that, there is nobody they have recruited in 5 years that has moved the needle. Gilliard, lyons and that one dude that was kicked out during training camp have been really bad failures.
Hopefully last years class proves us wrong. They were definitely bigger. -
Not sure if serious.AtomicDawg said:
Hopefully last years class proves us wrong. They were definitely bigger.
If serious, the script says they will make a splash initially - only to plateau/regress by sophomore year and suddenly seniored thereafter.
If not, wooshed.
-
MisterEm said:
Not sure if serious.AtomicDawg said:
Hopefully last years class proves us wrong. They were definitely bigger.
If serious, the script says they will make a splash initially - only to plateau/regress by sophomore year and suddenly seniored thereafter.
If not, wooshed.
Hope is of course contingent on a new head coach. I have no faith in the program at the moment to develop anything other than the aforementioned script.
I think you are forgetting the shoulder injuries that come with the youngsters replacing feeney next year after he regresses. -
Clearly..... mora should have been the coach if he wanted to recruit the best college player to come out of Washington long before he was the head coach at UCLA. What a fucktarded argument
-
Who is Jim Mora? Does he post here? Never seen him.longduckdong said:
Me too...gives me goose bumps. Wish he was the Seahawk coachDerekJohnson said:I can just see Mora going up to Myles Jack during pre-game warm ups and grabbing his facemask, peering deep into his eyes in a touching of souls, and shouting: "Myles, we're going to show those motherfuckers just what a great player you are. Every time we get in the friggin' red zone, you're getting the ball!!"
-
Shaq??AtomicDawg said:
I never realized it but they really have sucked at recruiting LB's since he has been here. Timu is okay but had to play too early. Feeney should have never had to play LB so early as he was too skinny.
Other than that, there is nobody they have recruited in 5 years that has moved the needle. Gilliard, lyons and that one dude that was kicked out during training camp have been really bad failures.
Hopefully last years class proves us wrong. They were definitely bigger. -
Solid LB but still undersized. Not a world beater - yet.alumni94 said:Shaq??
AtomicDawg said:I never realized it but they really have sucked at recruiting LB's since he has been here. Timu is okay but had to play too early. Feeney should have never had to play LB so early as he was too skinny.
Other than that, there is nobody they have recruited in 5 years that has moved the needle. Gilliard, lyons and that one dude that was kicked out during training camp have been really bad failures.
Hopefully last years class proves us wrong. They were definitely bigger.
I am still disappointed in the poor angles he's taken this year after his freshman year.



