Tequila says we are close to breaking through
Comments
-
Sark has brought in some solid skill position talent. I will give him credit for the secondary as well with guys like Sean Parker and Marcus Peters. John Timu has been playing a lot better so ill give him that as well.Tequilla said:Yep - I could have made it shorter.
Bottom line is that there's a lot there to work with in this program. Sark deserves credit for that. That's never been the issue.
The issue is can he get that talent over the next hump.
Overall Sark's talent typically looks a lot better on paper than what actually plays out on the field. However, when I look at the offers that a lot of his big 4 star recruits have gotten it is a lot of WSU/Col/Cal/UCLA (pre Mora)/Portland St./San Jose State etc.
He has a really bad track record at landing guys who have offers from Oregon/USC/UCLA (Mora)/Stanford. Hell Arizona State is going to start to beat us.
His recruiting is really overrated. I wouldn't qualify it as bad except for the beef he gets which has been nothing short of a dreckfest so far (the most important positions on the field, weird). -
We will be taking gloves off and rolling? Will we do this?
-
That post doesn't even need a few tweaks to show its TequillaFS.
-
Jesus Christ.
Brevity. Try it. -
Anyone know of any free wheelchair repair around here? Messed up my back axle reading this thread
-
Dude, the question has been answered.Tequilla said:Yep - I could have made it shorter.
Bottom line is that there's a lot there to work with in this program. Sark deserves credit for that. That's never been the issue.
The issue is can he get that talent over the next hump. -
I look forward to when we have a coach where every year people are saying, "if things had gone a little differently we might have gone 9-4 instead of 11-2". I am sick and tired of where every year people are saying, "if things had gone a little differently we might have gone 9-4 instead of 7-6". This is a trend. It feels like every Husky fan who supports Sark has noticed this trend but instead of identifying him as a perennial underachiever they just play make-believe and pretend he won the games. It is insane.
-
I love that tequila's post got hidden basically because of TL,DR
-
It was meant as a rhetorical question - put a . instead of a ?HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Dude, the question has been answered.Tequilla said:Yep - I could have made it shorter.
Bottom line is that there's a lot there to work with in this program. Sark deserves credit for that. That's never been the issue.
The issue is can he get that talent over the next hump.
Fuck off -
Fuck that.Tequilla said:Yep - I could have made it shorter.
Bottom line is that there's a lot there to work with in this program. Sark deserves credit for that. That's never been the issue.
The issue is can he get that talent over the next hump.
Washington recruits itself.
Part of being a coach is developing a long term vision and plan for the program.
Sark has brought none of that.
It's well documented here that Sark has no identity on offense or defense, he changes the offense more than I change my underware.
Sark suffers from Neuheisal disease ... bring in the big flashy wide receivers, recruit 5 stars and try and patch a team around the few you get.
It didn't work under Rick, it won't work now.
Fuck off.
