Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
I like this thread
Comments
-
-
Most of us are banned so we need a play by play.
-
-
long story short: no talent disparity between UW vs OSU/WSU according to F3, because recruiting rankings mean nothing.
-
They only mean something if it benefits Sark otherwise they are worthless.
-
How about you say it to his faceKeitelAvenue said:Why don't you take your $75K Doog ass and get the fuck out of here. This isn't some place you can go and try to restore your beaten down reputation. You fucking suck and everyone hates you and your ass face.
LEAVE! -
I am still on timeout.
Thanks for the cliff notes. -
7-11 on Aurora meeting planned?KeitelAvenue said:Why don't you take your $75K Doog ass and get the fuck out of here. This isn't some place you can go and try to restore your beaten down reputation. You fucking suck and everyone hates you and your ass face.
LEAVE! -
Oh man. F3 hits a new low digging his own grave in this thread,andkeeps coming back for more. By the end, he's arguing that UW doesn't have enough 5th year seniors to compete even though it is pointed out that they are one of the most experienced teams in the country
-
Yet people pay him anyway. Fuck.jrjarrell4 said:long story short: no talent disparity between UW vs OSU/WSU according to F3, because recruiting rankings mean nothing.
-
So if there's no disparity because recruiting rankings mean nothing and all HS players are essentially equal, is this not a scathing review of Sark's inability to develop talent?jrjarrell4 said:long story short: no talent disparity between UW vs OSU/WSU according to F3, because recruiting rankings mean nothing.
