Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dawg Defensive Line controlled the line of scrimmage

124

Comments

  • tvoie
    tvoie Member Posts: 996
    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
  • tvoie
    tvoie Member Posts: 996

    tvoie said:

    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.

    About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.
    LIPO
    Arizona is horrible!
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 6,017
    tvoie said:

    tvoie said:

    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.

    About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.
    LIPO
    Arizona is horrible!
    No shit
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,168
    tvoie said:

    tvoie said:

    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.

    About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.
    LIPO
    Arizona is horrible!
    That's the fucking point
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,890 Founders Club
    Sometimes shitty teams look terrific beating other shitty teams. Sometimes good or great teams look shitty beating shitty teams. Same as it ever was. I've got a hard time believing we are going to be shitty at all the positions that looked shitty yesterday once league play starts.
  • tvoie
    tvoie Member Posts: 996

    tvoie said:

    tvoie said:

    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.

    About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.
    LIPO
    Arizona is horrible!
    No shit
    I am an idiot. I thought you were taking about Rutgers. Point taken.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,270

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    It's all relative considering we play a 2-4-5 on defense. I get that lineup in the Pac 12 but when you have a team that is bigger than you, and they are running the ball down your throat, how do you not put another 1 or 2 guys back on the line? Everyone who wants to talk about Babushka getting cute should say the same shit about Kwietkowski(sp?). We ran that shit against Alabama and it was pathetic. They had Psalm as a 230 pound edge player and Alabama would run at him 2-3 times in a row because they knew we couldn't set the edge. Play to your fucking strengths... our strength on D is our D-Line depth.

    Rutgers averaged liked 3.1 yards per carry ...

    Your understanding of our defense and performance makes you suited to be a supporter of Gary Andersen ... what do you say @89ute
    Sure if you include the sack.

    Also they had a bunch of carries from their own 1 where we knew they were running and sold out to stop it.

    Both their RBs had their moments tearing through the front 7.
    The equivalent of getting salty on the "if you remove the 75 yard fly sweep TD when up 24 the ypc allowed was 3.2" line of thinking
    Yeah it's not though I am looking at all of the information not being selective to make a point.

    And including sacks is bullshit.
    We had 1 sack ... it's a massive over reaction to act like it skewed the numbers significantly
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    tvoie said:

    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.

    It's an overreaction
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,648
    Tequilla said:

    @Tequilla .... could Pete actually be smarter than all of us HHBs??? Maybe he don't wanna win Spring or Fall practice and he pre judged the opposition and thought it was wise not to hit in practice and limit live action. No one came out of practice seriously hurt. We have seen the defense and offensive lines get better through the season. Maybe Pete wasn't concerned about the point spread

    Very fair line of thinking ...

    We know that Pete likes using these preseason games as preseason games ...

    There's a lot of over reaction to last night to me ... the reality is that we won't really have much to get too bent out of shape about until we play Colorado ... just like at Arizona last year.

    The only real concern I had yesterday was Browning back footing a lot of throws ... you can't play QB at a high level doing that
    This is what I hope is true, that Pete had a few goals going into the game:

    -get a win
    -get the new guys some experience
    -no injuries
    -don't give away too much of the offense