Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dawg Defensive Line controlled the line of scrimmage

2

Comments

  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited September 2017
    rutgers (fucking rutgers) averaged 4 yards per play and had 131 yards rushing. Moreover, they ate up a ton of clock.

    I guess my standards are a little bit higher.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,994 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2017
    On offense UW wasn't prepared for a stout Rutgers DL. On defense, UW didn't tackle for shit, particularly the LBs and DBs. Can we all agree that Budda was one of the best husky tacklers of all time and we miss the shit out of him back there? The youngsters played pretty well, otherwise, covered pretty well, and broke on the ball at the right times. If not for a frosh DB tripping at the goal line, Rutgers only scores 7. A lot of the defensive stuff on the back end will improve, but it takes maturity to learn to wrap up first, instead of trying to kill guys Earl Thomas style with bone-crushing shoulder hits that only succeed 50% of the time.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Mosster47 said:

    That was Jerry Kill being an idiot. Edwards was averaging like 6 yards a carry, but every 3rd & short they would run that other little guy out there to lose two yards.

    Rutgers is a prime example of why there should only be 5 FBS teams max. There just isn't the coaching talent at that level to compete. I look back to when it was 10-7 and Rutgers had 4th & 1 from the UW 40 and they punt it away. You're a 30 point underdog at home. Why the fuck would you punt there?

    The second you stop trying to win as a coach your players stop playing to win. Then you throw in those multiple roster blunders at key points. A program like Rutgers is a coach that has no business being an FBS head coach trying to keep his seven figure job as long as he can. Trying to lose by less instead of trying to win shouldn't be rewarded.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,994 Standard Supporter
    Oh, and BBK has no arm strength, at all, as we saw from his multiple unsuccessful attempts to claw down the Rutgers RBs from aside or behind, resulting in 7 yard gains, 5 yards after BBK Contact.

    I think that's a stat we should keep: YABBKC.
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622

    Can we all agree that Budda was one of the best husky tacklers of all time and we miss the shit out of him back there?

    Absolutely.

  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    Tequilla said:

    The equivalent of getting salty on the "if you remove the 75 yard fly sweep TD when up 24 the ypc allowed was 3.2" line of thinking
    Yeah it's not though I am looking at all of the information not being selective to make a point.

    And including sacks is bullshit.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,736
    edited September 2017
    Lots of PT in critical moments? Levi is going to be a stud. Murphy is a star.
  • tvoietvoie Member Posts: 996
    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
  • tvoietvoie Member Posts: 996

    About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.
    LIPO
    Arizona is horrible!
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,736
    tvoie said:

    Arizona is horrible!
    No shit
  • GreenRiverGatorzGreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    tvoie said:

    Arizona is horrible!
    That's the fucking point
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,818 Founders Club
    Sometimes shitty teams look terrific beating other shitty teams. Sometimes good or great teams look shitty beating shitty teams. Same as it ever was. I've got a hard time believing we are going to be shitty at all the positions that looked shitty yesterday once league play starts.
  • tvoietvoie Member Posts: 996

    No shit
    I am an idiot. I thought you were taking about Rutgers. Point taken.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,989

    Yeah it's not though I am looking at all of the information not being selective to make a point.

    And including sacks is bullshit.
    We had 1 sack ... it's a massive over reaction to act like it skewed the numbers significantly
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    tvoie said:

    It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.

    It's an overreaction
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,436
    Tequilla said:

    Very fair line of thinking ...

    We know that Pete likes using these preseason games as preseason games ...

    There's a lot of over reaction to last night to me ... the reality is that we won't really have much to get too bent out of shape about until we play Colorado ... just like at Arizona last year.

    The only real concern I had yesterday was Browning back footing a lot of throws ... you can't play QB at a high level doing that
    This is what I hope is true, that Pete had a few goals going into the game:

    -get a win
    -get the new guys some experience
    -no injuries
    -don't give away too much of the offense

Sign In or Register to comment.