Dawg Defensive Line controlled the line of scrimmage
Comments
-
It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
-
About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
LIPO -
Arizona is horrible!NeGgaPlEaSe said:
About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
LIPO -
No shittvoie said:
Arizona is horrible!NeGgaPlEaSe said:
About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
LIPO -
That's the fucking pointtvoie said:
Arizona is horrible!NeGgaPlEaSe said:
About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
LIPO -
Sometimes shitty teams look terrific beating other shitty teams. Sometimes good or great teams look shitty beating shitty teams. Same as it ever was. I've got a hard time believing we are going to be shitty at all the positions that looked shitty yesterday once league play starts.
-
I am an idiot. I thought you were taking about Rutgers. Point taken.NeGgaPlEaSe said:
No shittvoie said:
Arizona is horrible!NeGgaPlEaSe said:
About as fucking mediocre as they were last year after beating Arizona.tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
LIPO -
We had 1 sack ... it's a massive over reaction to act like it skewed the numbers significantlyFremontTroll said:
Yeah it's not though I am looking at all of the information not being selective to make a point.Tequilla said:
The equivalent of getting salty on the "if you remove the 75 yard fly sweep TD when up 24 the ypc allowed was 3.2" line of thinkingFremontTroll said:
Sure if you include the sack.Tequilla said:
Rutgers averaged liked 3.1 yards per carry ...ToddTurnerLIVES said:It's all relative considering we play a 2-4-5 on defense. I get that lineup in the Pac 12 but when you have a team that is bigger than you, and they are running the ball down your throat, how do you not put another 1 or 2 guys back on the line? Everyone who wants to talk about Babushka getting cute should say the same shit about Kwietkowski(sp?). We ran that shit against Alabama and it was pathetic. They had Psalm as a 230 pound edge player and Alabama would run at him 2-3 times in a row because they knew we couldn't set the edge. Play to your fucking strengths... our strength on D is our D-Line depth.
Your understanding of our defense and performance makes you suited to be a supporter of Gary Andersen ... what do you say @89ute
Also they had a bunch of carries from their own 1 where we knew they were running and sold out to stop it.
Both their RBs had their moments tearing through the front 7.
And including sacks is bullshit. -
It's an overreactiontvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
-
This is what I hope is true, that Pete had a few goals going into the game:Tequilla said:
Very fair line of thinking ...NeGgaPlEaSe said:@Tequilla .... could Pete actually be smarter than all of us HHBs??? Maybe he don't wanna win Spring or Fall practice and he pre judged the opposition and thought it was wise not to hit in practice and limit live action. No one came out of practice seriously hurt. We have seen the defense and offensive lines get better through the season. Maybe Pete wasn't concerned about the point spread
We know that Pete likes using these preseason games as preseason games ...
There's a lot of over reaction to last night to me ... the reality is that we won't really have much to get too bent out of shape about until we play Colorado ... just like at Arizona last year.
The only real concern I had yesterday was Browning back footing a lot of throws ... you can't play QB at a high level doing that
-get a win
-get the new guys some experience
-no injuries
-don't give away too much of the offense
-
It feels like any momentum that UW had for recruiting died harder then Ballsdeep trying to make a point. And what in the world is drawing kids to Oregon right now?tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
-
Over reaction!? You don't say?Tequilla said:
Very fair line of thinking ...NeGgaPlEaSe said:@Tequilla .... could Pete actually be smarter than all of us HHBs??? Maybe he don't wanna win Spring or Fall practice and he pre judged the opposition and thought it was wise not to hit in practice and limit live action. No one came out of practice seriously hurt. We have seen the defense and offensive lines get better through the season. Maybe Pete wasn't concerned about the point spread
We know that Pete likes using these preseason games as preseason games ...
There's a lot of over reaction to last night to me ... the reality is that we won't really have much to get too bent out of shape about until we play Colorado ... just like at Arizona last year.
The only real concern I had yesterday was Browning back footing a lot of throws ... you can't play QB at a high level doing that
One of the many mantras of HH.
Keeps you coming back. Right Damone? -
So to confirm you only care to be accurate if it supports your point?Tequilla said:
We had 1 sack ... it's a massive over reaction to act like it skewed the numbers significantlyFremontTroll said:
Yeah it's not though I am looking at all of the information not being selective to make a point.Tequilla said:
The equivalent of getting salty on the "if you remove the 75 yard fly sweep TD when up 24 the ypc allowed was 3.2" line of thinkingFremontTroll said:
Sure if you include the sack.Tequilla said:
Rutgers averaged liked 3.1 yards per carry ...ToddTurnerLIVES said:It's all relative considering we play a 2-4-5 on defense. I get that lineup in the Pac 12 but when you have a team that is bigger than you, and they are running the ball down your throat, how do you not put another 1 or 2 guys back on the line? Everyone who wants to talk about Babushka getting cute should say the same shit about Kwietkowski(sp?). We ran that shit against Alabama and it was pathetic. They had Psalm as a 230 pound edge player and Alabama would run at him 2-3 times in a row because they knew we couldn't set the edge. Play to your fucking strengths... our strength on D is our D-Line depth.
Your understanding of our defense and performance makes you suited to be a supporter of Gary Andersen ... what do you say @89ute
Also they had a bunch of carries from their own 1 where we knew they were running and sold out to stop it.
Both their RBs had their moments tearing through the front 7.
And including sacks is bullshit.
Rutgers actually averaged 3.5 ypc. -
CashCuntWaffle said:
It feels like any momentum that UW had for recruiting died harder then Ballsdeep trying to make a point. And what in the world is drawing kids to Oregon right now?tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
-
Anyone who thinks the meltdowns are real is a moron. 99% of the people here know the only real weak links are the same as ever (e.g. babushka). The rest of the first game stuff is just that. It's worth noting what the weaknesses are each weak to see if shit sticks overtime but I think most people remember what the lines, etc looked like against Rootbeers last year and know what we'll look like by conference play.
-
CuntWaffle said:
It feels like any momentum that UW had for recruiting died harder then Ballsdeep trying to make a point. And what in the world is drawing kids to Oregon right now?tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
CuntWaffle said:
Is there a point here?tvoie said:It's not an overreaction to say UW very well may be mediocre this year. Rutgers is not good. No way around it.
-
/threadMad_Son said:Anyone who thinks the meltdowns are real is a moron. 99% of the people here know the only real weak links are the same as ever (e.g. babushka). The rest of the first game stuff is just that. It's worth noting what the weaknesses are each weak to see if shit sticks overtime but I think most people remember what the lines, etc looked like against Rootbeers last year and know what we'll look like by conference play.
