Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
My Grades
whuggy
Member Posts: 2,088
Pass Offense-C. Need receivers other than Pettis to step up.
Rush Offense-D. No blocking. No creativity.
Pass Defense-A. Good play from the youngsters. Need more rush.
Rush Defense-D/F. Missed Victor. Gaines and Vea WTF.
Kicking game-A-. Only downside was short kickoffs.
Coaching/Playcalling-No offensive creativity. Lack of challenge on TD catch.
Rush Offense-D. No blocking. No creativity.
Pass Defense-A. Good play from the youngsters. Need more rush.
Rush Defense-D/F. Missed Victor. Gaines and Vea WTF.
Kicking game-A-. Only downside was short kickoffs.
Coaching/Playcalling-No offensive creativity. Lack of challenge on TD catch.
Comments
-
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
C -
Rush defense was not a D/F.
They were pretty damn good in short yardage -
More questions created than answers unfortunately.
Survive and advance I guess. -
Actually we wouldn't know since Rutgers punted twice on 4th and 1 THANK GAWD.dhdawg said:Rush defense was not a D/F.
They were pretty damn good in short yardage -
Vea/Gaines had their moments, but hugely inconsistent. Potoa'e the same. The ILBs need to commit sudoku.dhdawg said:Rush defense was not a D/F.
They were pretty damn good in short yardage -
Exactly. A gift.FremontTroll said:
Actually we wouldn't know since Rutgers punted twice on 4th and 1 THANK GAWD.dhdawg said:Rush defense was not a D/F.
They were pretty damn good in short yardage -
-
CHRIST
Rush defense was like a B. Yes they ripped off some 10 yard runs but it was not that bad. -
So far Lubick and Huff are good recruiters who cant coach worth shit. AKA useless
-
last year when UW had opportunities to pull away from opponents it fucking run away with it. this team could not do it.
