Jon Wilner on UW's soft, flaccid, cupcake, cream puff schedule
Comments
-
This was the dreck they beat:YellowSnow said:
The fuck are you talking about? They lost to CU 2 weeks after loss to the Kewgs. Then then went on a hum, hum run that Sark would have gone 5-1 or 6-0 against. Big fucking deal. They are overrated. Sure, we could blow that one, but I think our loss/es are more likely elsewhere.salemcoog said:
Ummm... This post wreaks of you stuck back in the time when both UW and WSU blew Stanford out last Season. After that they went 6-0 and played normal Stanford football. Nothing spectacular, they just didn't lose after they found the QB who should have started all of last Season.. Kind of like the USC did. You guys can win that game and even be favored, but to auto chalk that in the win column tells me you med to spend more tim on Football and less on shitty pole poasting.YellowSnow said:CHRIST. Yet another pundit goes with the now cliché 11-1 with loss at The Farm. Come on mainstream college football media - do better! Everyone knows we aren't loosing to the Trees this year. They are overrated with a shitty ass and gimpy QB. Shaw gives you no in game advantage, etc, etc. It's 12-0 or 1 mind boggling upset loss to someone we aren't expecting to loose to- e.g., UCLA w/ 4th string QB ( @RaceBannon narrative ) or shitting the bed the in the dessert somehow to an illiterate coaching staff.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/24/washington-football-projecting-the-season-game-by-game/
And postscriptum to Boobs...
Arizona
Oregon State
Oregon
Cal
Rice
North Carolina -
Christ you're worse than me at Maff. You best stick to wearing a cheap seer suckersucker suit, defending pederasts in non air conditioned, backwoods Appalachia court rooms.tenndawg said:Whiskey swilling anti-Confederte historians and bumbling mathematicians- pay close attention
Here's my odds:
12-0 37%
11-1 44.3%
10-2. 5.1 %
Total Record: 33-3
Total Percent: 86.4%
33-3 =30
30 X 86.4 = 2592
2592 is the correct answer -
How the hell does this thread have 34 responses.
-
Because you touch yourself while watching Marcus Mariota videosHuskyJW said:How the hell does this thread have 34 responses.
-
salemcooger just stopped by to fag out the thread.
Success. -
UW is -1 over Furd at the Westgate right now if you are into free money handouts. I hit that hard last weekend.
-
Whoa.....Is the camera on my laptop turned on??TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Because you touch yourself while watching Marcus Mariota videosHuskyJW said:How the hell does this thread have 34 responses.
-
loosing
-
Kicker shit the bed for sure, but I don't think I'd call that a WTF loss. That was Kappy senior year, they had two good RBs and a better-than-it-should-have-been defense. BSU have ever chance to win but it just a great football game. WTF was Nevada losing to Hawaii or some shit that year.Quietcowskee said:
A WTF loss like Boise's shit kicker shitting the bed against Reno? How's Vizcaino looking?89ute said:
I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)YellowSnow said:
I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:Mosster47 said:The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.
I see 10-2 for the Doogs.
10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%
Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition. -
Yeah that Nevada team was good and Kaep was playing out of his mind and it still took massive multiple choke jobs by kicker to lose
-
Somewhere in the 15% range feels about right to meFremontTroll said:
Apologies in advance for injecting some MAFF into the discussion but a 25% chance of going undefeated over a 12 game schedule is extremely high.89ute said:
I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)YellowSnow said:
I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:Mosster47 said:The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.
I see 10-2 for the Doogs.
10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%
Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition.
UW would basically need to be >95% favorites in every single game.
.96^12=.69
Small probabilities accumulate over 12 games.
Then throw in a couple games where UW is less than 66% to win and it is pretty much impossible to get to 25%. -
For those looking to bet the mortgage ... that's a very appealing option if you are of the belief that it's hard to beat the Death Row Dawgs defense without a QBntxduck said:UW is -1 over Furd at the Westgate right now if you are into free money handouts. I hit that hard last weekend.
-
-
The speed difference between UW and Stanford was unreal last year...I have a hard time believing Stanford closed even 20% of that gap in the offseason. May be close for a half, but UW will pull away to win rather easily, say, 34-17?Tequilla said:
For those looking to bet the mortgage ... that's a very appealing option if you are of the belief that it's hard to beat the Death Row Dawgs defense without a QBntxduck said:UW is -1 over Furd at the Westgate right now if you are into free money handouts. I hit that hard last weekend.
-
You guys I screwed up 5th grade maff. I suck. Ignore me.
-
Here, lemme help:FremontTroll said:
Apologies in advance for injecting some MAFF into the discussion but a 25% chance of going undefeated over a 12 game schedule is extremely high.89ute said:
I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)YellowSnow said:
I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:Mosster47 said:The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.
I see 10-2 for the Doogs.
10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%
Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition.
UW would basically need to be >95% favorites in every single game.
.96^12=.69
Small probabilities accumulate over 12 games.
Then throw in a couple games where UW is less than 66% to win and it is pretty much impossible to get to 25%.
= real fucking high probability of 12-0 -
i need roaddawg to verify the math.89ute said:
Here, lemme help:FremontTroll said:
Apologies in advance for injecting some MAFF into the discussion but a 25% chance of going undefeated over a 12 game schedule is extremely high.89ute said:
I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)YellowSnow said:
I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:Mosster47 said:The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.
I see 10-2 for the Doogs.
10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%
Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition.
UW would basically need to be >95% favorites in every single game.
.96^12=.69
Small probabilities accumulate over 12 games.
Then throw in a couple games where UW is less than 66% to win and it is pretty much impossible to get to 25%.
= real fucking high probability of 12-0 -
Coker deserves a good defense.YellowSnow said:
Christ you're worse than me at Maff. You best stick to wearing a cheap seer suckersucker suit, defending pederasts in non air conditioned, backwoods Appalachia court rooms.tenndawg said:Whiskey swilling anti-Confederte historians and bumbling mathematicians- pay close attention
Here's my odds:
12-0 37%
11-1 44.3%
10-2. 5.1 %
Total Record: 33-3
Total Percent: 86.4%
33-3 =30
30 X 86.4 = 2592
2592 is the correct answer -
@tenndawg as general counsel for the TSIO is over. Love it!Swaye said:
Coker deserves a good defense.YellowSnow said:
Christ you're worse than me at Maff. You best stick to wearing a cheap seer suckersucker suit, defending pederasts in non air conditioned, backwoods Appalachia court rooms.tenndawg said:Whiskey swilling anti-Confederte historians and bumbling mathematicians- pay close attention
Here's my odds:
12-0 37%
11-1 44.3%
10-2. 5.1 %
Total Record: 33-3
Total Percent: 86.4%
33-3 =30
30 X 86.4 = 2592
2592 is the correct answer -
I came againGladstone said:here's the game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfWNkD7haeA
very gg
