Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

TSiO Episode #32: Texas, Tequila, and Regional Recruiting Data...

124

Comments

  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    In terms of the pod itself, yeah, the pre-emptive hating on Coker schtick is played out. If he is rambling and has gone no where you can call it out. The joke has reached 24 times however. You don't have to change the the dynamic without being repetitive. I think everyone (even Teq) actually brings something to the table. RC isn't the one to undermine though.

    There was something that struck me as a logical inconsistency in the pod... of course it took 3 fucking hours over two days to listen to this so maybe this isn't quite right but basically point 1 was we need to pull 1-2 upper tier guys out of the region every year to close the talent gap and point 2 was we can't wait 10 years to build in-roads elsewhere because at that point we'll have already been successful enough that we will just have the cred to recruit top players.

    So which is it- will we get there without recruiting out of the region or not?

    If we do have to reach out of the region to pull kids where is it going to be?

    Near east has no talent
    Middle east is tied to the big ten
    Far east doesn't know there is a Washington that isn't the capital of this country.
    Deep south sure as hell isn't coming here.
    Texas is aware we exists but just doesn't think anything (positive) of us.
    And now we've circled back around into the region which is the only place we have a real draw.

    Like we'd really be just as good off running recruitment messages on Pac-12 Shandong.

    There is no magic bullet here but a stance has to be taken - can we do it all in region or not. It almost sounded like someone wanted to say that with the right coaches we could scratch out a living in region but over the course of the marathon pod I don't remember that happening.

    Also yeah, for all of us busy/adhd/married fucks more shorter pods is way better. Like I can't tell you whether two 1.5 hour pods is better than one 3 hour pod in your life, but in my life more shorter pods are better. When you do the conference review I'd rather 11 one hour rants about the other teams than 1 eleven hour manifesto. Like I'll still listen but I'll hate you and me the more for it.

    In terms of haikus I really think Teq may have hit 17 syllables but I'm not sure. I went into this looking for a reason to give it to DDY but at the end it simply came down to @CokeGreaterThanPepsi had the best haiku
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    Mad_Son said:

    In terms of the pod itself, yeah, the pre-emptive hating on Coker schtick is played out. If he is rambling and has gone no where you can call it out. The joke has reached 24 times however. You don't have to change the the dynamic without being repetitive. I think everyone (even Teq) actually brings something to the table. RC isn't the one to undermine though.

    There was something that struck me as a logical inconsistency in the pod... of course it took 3 fucking hours over two days to listen to this so maybe this isn't quite right but basically point 1 was we need to pull 1-2 upper tier guys out of the region every year to close the talent gap and point 2 was we can't wait 10 years to build in-roads elsewhere because at that point we'll have already been successful enough that we will just have the cred to recruit top players.

    So which is it- will we get there without recruiting out of the region or not?

    If we do have to reach out of the region to pull kids where is it going to be?

    Near east has no talent
    Middle east is tied to the big ten
    Far east doesn't know there is a Washington that isn't the capital of this country.
    Deep south sure as hell isn't coming here.
    Texas is aware we exists but just doesn't think anything (positive) of us.
    And now we've circled back around into the region which is the only place we have a real draw.

    Like we'd really be just as good off running recruitment messages on Pac-12 Shandong.

    There is no magic bullet here but a stance has to be taken - can we do it all in region or not. It almost sounded like someone wanted to say that with the right coaches we could scratch out a living in region but over the course of the marathon pod I don't remember that happening.

    Also yeah, for all of us busy/adhd/married fucks more shorter pods is way better. Like I can't tell you whether two 1.5 hour pods is better than one 3 hour pod in your life, but in my life more shorter pods are better. When you do the conference review I'd rather 11 one hour rants about the other teams than 1 eleven hour manifesto. Like I'll still listen but I'll hate you and me the more for it.

    In terms of haikus I really think Teq may have hit 17 syllables but I'm not sure. I went into this looking for a reason to give it to DDY but at the end it simply came down to @CokeGreaterThanPepsi had the best haiku

    Thanks Tequila.
  • Edwin_Bambino
    Edwin_Bambino Member Posts: 2,944
    Agree on the Coker point. Once Teq and DDY are fucked up he is the only one that makes salient points so please stop cutting him off.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    @Mad_Son

    Does there have to be a conclusion drawn or consensus reached?

    You are right in that themes throughout the pod was needing a few extra good players and likely needing to slightly expand our recruiting base. I fall into the line of thought that we need to expand and our ultimate long term success under Pete likely requires us to break norms. Pepsi and Dennis are skeptical that we will successfully do so. But the key in my mind is having that discussion and placing it on the table to get people thinking about it with historical facts supporting positions. It's likely a topic that will reoccur in pods over time as I expect our recruiting effort will be tied into this.

    But to me, that's what makes the pod great is that you can have differing opinions that have logical reasons behind their stance. It's why over time we've been critical of Pease, Strausser, and now Malloe ... we look at the evidence and draw our conclusions.

    Very fair point about the length of the pod ... we definitely don't walk into a pod thinking 3 hours. What I hope comes through in pods of that length is the passion that each of us have in discussing these topics as to varying degrees these are underlying issues for the program that will get us consistently into that elite range. There's no question listening back to the last hour that Dennis and I make it more challenging to find out points and conclusions ... apologies for that. They definitely are there but there's a lot more noise surrounding them than needed.

    As for Pepsi, wasn't this board founded on the principal of the same joke being funny 81x in a row? To me, he's the Monty from Major League of the pod ... not the best color man in baseball for nothing. But you are right in that there are things that Pepsi sees that only he sees because that's who he is ...

    Anyway, thanks for listening and the feedback
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    Tequilla said:

    @Mad_Son

    Does there have to be a conclusion drawn or consensus reached?

    You are right in that themes throughout the pod was needing a few extra good players and likely needing to slightly expand our recruiting base. I fall into the line of thought that we need to expand and our ultimate long term success under Pete likely requires us to break norms. Pepsi and Dennis are skeptical that we will successfully do so. But the key in my mind is having that discussion and placing it on the table to get people thinking about it with historical facts supporting positions. It's likely a topic that will reoccur in pods over time as I expect our recruiting effort will be tied into this.

    But to me, that's what makes the pod great is that you can have differing opinions that have logical reasons behind their stance. It's why over time we've been critical of Pease, Strausser, and now Malloe ... we look at the evidence and draw our conclusions.

    Very fair point about the length of the pod ... we definitely don't walk into a pod thinking 3 hours. What I hope comes through in pods of that length is the passion that each of us have in discussing these topics as to varying degrees these are underlying issues for the program that will get us consistently into that elite range. There's no question listening back to the last hour that Dennis and I make it more challenging to find out points and conclusions ... apologies for that. They definitely are there but there's a lot more noise surrounding them than needed.

    As for Pepsi, wasn't this board founded on the principal of the same joke being funny 81x in a row? To me, he's the Monty from Major League of the pod ... not the best color man in baseball for nothing. But you are right in that there are things that Pepsi sees that only he sees because that's who he is ...

    Anyway, thanks for listening and the feedback

    You may have made the point (reaching out of region) and remained consistent however I think DDY agreed with that point then changed tune. Certainly I don't expect different people to always agree on every point.

    In like Sark year two I remember doogs on dmc who loved our attempts to recruit nationally. DDY and I valiantly tried to explain the difficulty and costs of doing so and how it was a terrible idea (which of course proved true).

    We're at a different point now though where we only need a couple guys and if we can get a foothold in a new territory that may be the sweet spot for incremental effort and having access to enough quality. I think our best bet is probably Texas due to recruit availability and culture (far from a perfect match but much closer than east coast for example). If we start winning championships then I think we could do stuff in the NE too where loyalties are weaker and our prestige can speak for itself.
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    It's also worth noting that anther reason expanding to an additional region may work now (I'm not taking a stance yet but I'm open to it) is we are in a much better position and don't have to just sell snake oil as well as we're taking care of our bases first and this is a supplement, not the main course.
  • DoubleJDawg
    DoubleJDawg Member Posts: 636
    Mad_Son said:

    It's also worth noting that anther reason expanding to an additional region may work now (I'm not taking a stance yet but I'm open to it) is we are in a much better position and don't have to just sell snake oil as well as we're taking care of our bases first and this is a supplement, not the main course.

    I wonder to what extent Peterman is expanding the pool to make sure he has enough OKGs/good program fits to pick from

    I mean, there's no question the talent should always be there in the west but maybe with a principled recruiting approach you need a bigger prospect pool and recruiting territory than the average top-tier program
  • DoubleJDawg
    DoubleJDawg Member Posts: 636

    Mad_Son said:

    It's also worth noting that anther reason expanding to an additional region may work now (I'm not taking a stance yet but I'm open to it) is we are in a much better position and don't have to just sell snake oil as well as we're taking care of our bases first and this is a supplement, not the main course.

    I wonder to what extent Peterman is expanding the pool to make sure he has enough OKGs/good program fits to pick from

    I mean, there's no question the talent should always be there in the west but maybe with a principled recruiting approach you need a bigger prospect pool and recruiting territory than the average top-tier program
    Taking this a bit further, maybe we need to consider an additional coefficient for "OKG-ness" in the expected value recruiting calculations that @Tequilla @CokeGreaterThanPepsi @Dennis_DeYoung talk about

    This could swing the expected value pretty significantly away from non-OKG 3-star WA guys and more toward 3/4 star OKGs in TX and afield if OKG-ness is a major success factor

    However I have been drinking this evening so what do I know
  • rustysavage
    rustysavage Member Posts: 942
    For the love of god DDY if I ever heard a voice suited for writing, it was yours. Teq u are marginally more listenable. Pepsi u da man.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    I'd love your opinion @89ute as to why USC is being successful getting that inroad into the Poly world ...

    But your overall point, this idea that UW is going to go into Utah and be successful? Not going to happen. The only chance we have is with the random kid like Ty Jones that for whatever reason is stuck living in the greater SLC area (and in Jones' case Provo) and can't wait to find a way to get the hell out of there.
  • 89ute
    89ute Member Posts: 2,477
    Tequilla said:

    I'd love your opinion @89ute as to why USC is being successful getting that inroad into the Poly world ...

    But your overall point, this idea that UW is going to go into Utah and be successful? Not going to happen. The only chance we have is with the random kid like Ty Jones that for whatever reason is stuck living in the greater SLC area (and in Jones' case Provo) and can't wait to find a way to get the hell out of there.

    Also with Ty Jones, hard to pick Utah with shit QBs and shit offense. There was a TE who left Salt Lake a couple of years ago to go to Stanford. He's there now and getting PT. Another case of a top notch offensive player staying the hell away from Utah. But interestingly, I think kids are liking what Troy Taylor is selling. We've pulled in a couple of nice offensive recruits since he's come aboard. I thought It was Jack Tuttle, who has been actively recruiting for us, and i'm sure that's part of it but that doesn't explain Carrington.

    As far as Polys to SC, I think its just SC being SC and nothing more. As far a Tufele, I was shocked we lost him and it was a hard kick in the nuts as far as recruiting profile, but we later learned Jay's dad got himself a nice little job with SC. I don't think they're building any kind of pipeline, but it's still concerning.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Shocking ... shady recruiting by SC???
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Marlons brother... Tufele's dad? So USC is going to "out recruit" schools by loading up payroll with relatives? Yea that seems like a really sustainable approach. Nansen the Ponzi scheme buttfuck.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    Tequilla said:

    I'd love your opinion @89ute as to why USC is being successful getting that inroad into the Poly world ...

    But your overall point, this idea that UW is going to go into Utah and be successful? Not going to happen. The only chance we have is with the random kid like Ty Jones that for whatever reason is stuck living in the greater SLC area (and in Jones' case Provo) and can't wait to find a way to get the hell out of there.

    image
    Ahem
  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    89ute said:

    Tequilla said:

    I'd love your opinion @89ute as to why USC is being successful getting that inroad into the Poly world ...

    But your overall point, this idea that UW is going to go into Utah and be successful? Not going to happen. The only chance we have is with the random kid like Ty Jones that for whatever reason is stuck living in the greater SLC area (and in Jones' case Provo) and can't wait to find a way to get the hell out of there.

    Also with Ty Jones, hard to pick Utah with shit QBs and shit offense. There was a TE who left Salt Lake a couple of years ago to go to Stanford. He's there now and getting PT. Another case of a top notch offensive player staying the hell away from Utah. But interestingly, I think kids are liking what Troy Taylor is selling. We've pulled in a couple of nice offensive recruits since he's come aboard. I thought It was Jack Tuttle, who has been actively recruiting for us, and i'm sure that's part of it but that doesn't explain Carrington.

    As far as Polys to SC, I think its just SC being SC and nothing more. As far a Tufele, I was shocked we lost him and it was a hard kick in the nuts as far as recruiting profile, but we later learned Jay's dad got himself a nice little job with SC. I don't think they're building any kind of pipeline, but it's still concerning.
    Keep an OC for more than a single year (+ dont suck) and you'll start seeing an uptick. The amount of OCs Whittingham has burned through is insanity.
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited August 2017
    FREE PUB from doogpound

    https://www.uwdawgpound.com/2017/8/1/16076416/dots-washington-huskies-football-markelle-fultz-fall-camp-recruiting-secondary-azeem-victor

    S/O @jhfstyle24 - hopefully ur grades are good enough to be a doog one day unlike @backthepack

    Baabz flag me caz you a fag
  • DeepSeaZ
    DeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    Here's what I got from the podcast. Teq has an automated ice maker. Stop fucking around with your alcoholism and do it right. Get some of these. image
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937

    FREE PUB from doogpound

    https://www.uwdawgpound.com/2017/8/1/16076416/dots-washington-huskies-football-markelle-fultz-fall-camp-recruiting-secondary-azeem-victor

    S/O @jhfstyle24 - hopefully ur grades are good enough to be a doog one day unlike @backthepack

    Baabz flag me caz you a fag

    Grades shit + SAT score elite
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    Don't listen if easily offended ...

    LOL
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    That podcast is one of the most horrifying, disturbing, profane, brilliant, insightful, and hilarious UW-related things I’ve ever heard. How have I not heard of these guys before?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    It's a really fun listen.

    Sounds like my usual drunken conversations with friends after games.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    I don't if I'd say "horrifying", but the other descriptions are appropriate

    Their podcast is available on iTunes. Go back and listen to some of their podcasts from earlier this year. (Those descriptions apply to the earlier podcasts that I’ve listened to as well, so expect more of the same.)