Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Is Bernie Sanders running in 2020?

2»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I heard he was moving to Venezuela because socialism rocks and yoou can bang children.

    @Sledog wet dream. Well except the socialism part. It must be a conundrum for you.
    Pedophiles should be shot on sight.

    Of course liberal psycho doc's are now going to say it's normal behavior and remove it from the list of mental disorders.
    We didn't want Mike Pence anyway.
    Why?

    Because He doesn't like fags like you?
    No, he prefers underage fags.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    salemcoog said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    I heard he was moving to Venezuela because socialism rocks and yoou can bang children.

    @Sledog wet dream. Well except the socialism part. It must be a conundrum for you.
    Pedophiles should be shot on sight.

    Of course liberal psycho doc's are now going to say it's normal behavior and remove it from the list of mental disorders.
    We didn't want Mike Pence anyway.
    Why?

    Because He doesn't like fags like you?
    He turned Boobs down for a dinner date.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,754 Standard Supporter
    Not that you fucks are my friends.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    What do you mean who's going to pay for it? Are you unfamiliar with how government works? Do you not understand what taxes are? Should you be having this conversation if you don't?

    New taxes are always a great idea. We can achieve great things by stealing the money of hardworking Americans.
    It's almost as if a benefit provided by the government can offset the cost of a tax increase. Gasp
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Bernie needs to play a big part in the campaign. However I would like someone young.

    Tulsi gabbard Seth moulton Tim Ryan, even kamala Harris would be semi acceptable.

    Just as long as it isn't a Cory booker, Kirsten gillebrand or someone of that sort.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited July 2017
    dhdawg said:

    What do you mean who's going to pay for it? Are you unfamiliar with how government works? Do you not understand what taxes are? Should you be having this conversation if you don't?

    New taxes are always a great idea. We can achieve great things by stealing the money of hardworking Americans.
    It's almost as if a benefit provided by the government can offset the cost of a tax increase. Gasp
    That certainly used to be a popular theory. I'm old enough to remember when taxes used to cover expenses. We all know, that hasn't been the case for decades now and our window for borrowing money, from ourselves to cover the shortfall, is quickly closing.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    dhdawg said:

    What do you mean who's going to pay for it? Are you unfamiliar with how government works? Do you not understand what taxes are? Should you be having this conversation if you don't?

    New taxes are always a great idea. We can achieve great things by stealing the money of hardworking Americans.
    It's almost as if a benefit provided by the government can offset the cost of a tax increase. Gasp
    That certainly used to be a popular theory. I'm old enough to remember when taxes used to cover expenses. We all know, that hasn't been the case for decades now and our window for borrowing money, from ourselves to cover the shortfall, is quickly closing.
    Actually that has happened twice post depression. In 2000 and the late 50s, both after huge tax increases. That you rail against. Every time taxes have been cut, it's led to bigger deficits.